Showing posts with label South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Bad judgment, bad journalism, and bad taste -plus plain old political avarice- continue intersecting in #Broward in heretofore unknown and unexpected ways as controversial former Sheriff #ScottIsrael tries to regain patronage-rich post he was stripped of


Bad judgment, bad journalism, and bad taste -plus plain old political avarice- continue intersecting in Broward County in heretofore unknown and unexpected ways when it comes to reporting on the efforts of controversial former Broward Sheriff Scott Israel to regain the patronage-rich post he was stripped of last year.

Two weeks from today, Broward will wake up to news about who earned the Democratic Party's nominee to be Broward Sheriff. Who will it be?

Consider how each of these facts, on their own, in other parts of the country would be considered damning, and then consider what they -collectively- say about how things are done in South Florida politics and rates barely a shrug from most journalists.
I half-expect that among the younger reporters, esp. on TV, who lack any kind of institutional memories for what has gone on in South Florida in the past 30 years.
Few make an effort to learn the politcal 

Whether it's: 
a.) the South Florida Sun-Sentinel's inexplicable endorsement of disgraced former #Broward Sheriff #ScottIsrael, who was first suspended from office by FL Gov. Ron DeSantis and then had that removal made final when the Florida state Senate refused last October to reinstate him. 
As most of you regular readers of this blog will recall, all four of Broward's Democratic senators -Lauren Book, Gary Farmer, Kevin Rader, Perry Thurston Jr.- voted for Israel's reinstatement as Sheriff, a vote and effort which raised many more questions among Broward citizens and voters -and local media- than the four of them seemed prepared for. 
Text of endorsement is at bottom

b.) the bewildering endorsement and then quick rescinding and backtracking of an endorsement of him by the unpopular, problem-plagued Broward Teachers Union, after a large member and public backlash; or, 

c.) via a previously unknown to me #SoFL lifestyle magazine called THINK, that's sold at Publix supermarkets, which currently features Scott Israel on the cover just as the Aug. 18th Democratic Party primary and Early Voting in Broward County nears, and as he seeks to regain the reins of that large, powerful and cash-dispensing political patronage machine that also deals with crime fighting.

Perhaps worst of all with respect to the latter, Scott Israel is the cover boy because there is a profile inside, and if you can believe it, that profile NEVER mentions the 17 students and teachers murdered at #MSD, or the murders @FLLFlyer!









-------------
So, here's a selected overview via Twitter of what's been happening the past few months in the race to be Broward Sheriff and the persistent efforts by allies and cronies of Scott Israel to sabotage things at BSO and find anything that they believe will publicly embarrass his successor, Gregory Tony.

Tony was savvy enough to get rid of many people at BSO who were high flyers under Israel, who, himself, was a very big believer in traditional political patronage, including hiring people to work for BSO not because of their outstanding abilities, talent or expertise, but rather because of who they were -a relative or child of an important supporter in an area where Israel wanted to be boss.

A good place to start reading about and/or understanding what's often seemed like often craven sense of entitlement that Scott Israel had exhibited is with my blog posts of 2013:

July 24, 2013
Broward County Ethics in Action! Sometimes the gravy train of cronyism leads you and your family to a yacht vacation to The Bahamas; Local10 investigative reporter Bob Norman asks Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel to answer questions about his family's yacht vacation after the Sheriff claimed paying $1,500 settled the matter. But websites say the value of that yacht trip is MUCH 
MORE!; @CityEthics
https://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/broward-county-ethics-in-action.html

August 28, 2013
End-of-the-Summer BSO Blues continue under Broward Sheriff Scott Israel. Ethical, financial and management problems -and questions about his hiring so many high-priced political hires- hover over Sheriff Israel almost 10 months after his election, and are examined, separately, by Broward Beat's Buddy Nevins and Local10's Bob Norman.
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/end-of-summer-bso-blues-continue-under.html

By the way, before you start re-reading some of the headlines and stories about what's been going on the past year with Scott Israel and Gregory Tony, ask yourself a question.
It concerns a frequent foil on this blog, someone who has exhibited such appalling personal and political behavior and so little interest in properly serving his hallandale beach constituents when I lived there, serial liar and manipulator Florida state Rep. Shevrin Jones, District 101, which includes part of Hollywood. Jones is now a candidate for state Senate District 34, and, most importantly for this post, is the son of the mayor of West Park, with a population that's smaller than many condominium developments in Florida, and less than half of Hallandale Beach's.
West Park is not so much a city as it is a political clubhouse -and the home of WPLG/Local10 News.

So, Jone not only has a primary job that pays him over $100,000 a year, despite nobody being especially clear what it is that he does for such a sum, considering how much time he's away in Tallahasse doing his second job as a state rep, but has, yes, a third job.
Wow, that's a lot of hats, isn't it?
A lot of situations where he has a loyalty to different people, right?

Well, in that third job of his, he's paid $72,000 a year by BSO for what is designated a part-time position.
Wow, $72,000 for a part-time position, when you already have two other jobs?

Well, when you know that BSO has a contract with the City of West Park, which his father was mayor of since it was incorporated, though not now, it all makes much more sense, doesn't it?
So that being said, if Jones had been in the Florida state Senate last Fall when they had to vote and decide whether or not to reinstate Scott Israel into his job after he'd been suspended by Governor DeSantis, how do you think he'd have voted?
(Assuming he wasn't smart enough to recuse himself from the vote, so he would not get charged with ethics violations?)
Well, why don't you ask him?

As I write this blog post on Wednesday morning August 5th, there are 13 days to go until the August 18th primary election where Jones is attempting to get promoted politically after many years of accomplishing very, very little as a state Rep., and become one of just 40 state senators in Florida, the third-largest state in the nation.
A political post from which I have long-believed based on simply keeping my eyes open and asking lots of questions, that Jones will devote every single waking day of trying desperately to inject himself onto the radar of South Florida news media under the flimsiest of possible reasons, something he has already been doing for years.

Why?
To become the successor in Congress to Rep. Frederica Wilson when she is no longer on the scene and can thoroughly trounce him.
Trust me, that's his goal, which is a very, very scary prospect condisdering how shallow and narcissistic he is.
In case you forgot, narcissistic personality disorder symptoms include an excessive need for admiration, disregard for others' feelings, an inability to handle any criticism, and a sense of entitlement.
Check.

I'll have more on that quest of Jones in an upcoming blog post, but returning to the question of Jones and his jobs, if you were a Broward voter who were to ask him how he'd have voted last October on Israel's reinstatement, that would put you one up on the South Florida press corps,
Not a single South Florida-based reporter has shown any interest in asking him this simple question and asking him to explain why.
Me, I think that speaks volumes.

These tweets are in reverse-chron order to flow more logically:











































































----


South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Sun Sentinel Editorial Broward sheriff
Despite past, Dems should nominate Israel
July 19, 2020

The six-way Democratic primary for Broward County sheriff is one of those elections without an ideal choice, in which the question is simply which of the viable candidacies is the better one. That is why we recommend Scott Israel, the former sheriff.

Gregory Tony, the incumbent, should not have been appointed and does not deserve to be elected. The other four candidates lack sufficient money and political support to be competitive. There are only two viable candidates in this race: Israel and Tony.

This has been our most difficult endorsement decision. We recognize that it will be poorly received among the families shattered by the February 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, where a former student firing a military-style semi-automatic rifle left 17 students and faculty dead, and 17 injured. Their grief is beyond anyone's comprehension and deserves respect.

Many of them held Israel to blame, as did Gov. Ron DeSantis when he carried out a campaign promise to suspend him.

We thought so too, at first, and advised then-governor Rick Scott to remove Israel.

With time, however, that judgment seems harsh. Israel could not have prevented the tragedy. The school system was more to blame. So was the FBI, which did nothing about a credible warning of a potential school shooter.

Israel's most serious failing was a policy that left it to a deputy's discretion whether to engage an active shooter.

Overall, Israel had been a good sheriff.

The question, then, is whether Tony, his major rival, deserves the office to which DeSantis appointed him upon suspending Israel.

He does not, and the department would be in better hands with Israel.

Tony's career is marred by deceit. He lied to DeSantis to get the job. He lied by concealing a significant fact that the governor and the public deserved to know - that when he was 14, he had shot and killed another young man. He also withheld this fact from the Coral Springs Police Department, where he began his law enforcement career 15 years ago.

He also kept from Coral Springs that he had used a hallucinogenic substance - LSD - in the 1990s, and that he had been charged with passing a bad check while a student at Florida State University. He told Coral Springs he had not known about the charge.

Besides credibility, there also are questions of conflict of interest, a hot temper ill befitting the office, and injudicious conduct in his private life.

Israel and Tony dominate the field of six. There are no longer runoffs in Florida, so the nomination may be won with a small fraction of the vote.

Voters have one chance to get it right.

The nominee - and the likely next sheriff, since Democrats dominate Broward politics - will either be Israel, a veteran at 64, or Tony, who at 41 seems to be out of his depth despite the five stars that adorn his collar.

Israel's tenure before the Parkland tragedy was progressive and without personal scandal. As we have said before:

"In many ways Israel has been a good sheriff ... Burglaries and violent crime are down. He's taken stands against guns on campus, the Stand your Ground law and people openly carrying guns. He's made reluctant deputies wear body cameras and at least one non-lethal device - like a Taser or baton - on their belts. And he's masterful at community relations, handing out turkeys at Thanksgiving, riding in the LGBTQ pride parade and attending services at diverse churches and temples."

BSO's failures at Parkland

Israel could not have known that Scot Peterson, the decorated deputy assigned to the high school in Parkland, would prove to be a coward. Peterson hid outside while Coral Springs police rushed in.

The reason that BSO deputies didn't take the lead owed to the vagaries of Broward's 911 system, which routed calls from inside the school to Coral Springs PD. The sheriff's dispatcher initially knew only what Peterson was reporting on his radio - misinformation about possible gunshots outside and directions for deputies to stay back.

BSO's epic failure that day remains seared in our collective memory. While some deputies eventually demonstrated bravery, far too many showed cowardice, hiding behind trees, cars and walls. Besides Peterson, seven other deputies also heard the gunfire and failed to pursue the shooter. The Marjory Stoneman Douglas Public Safety Commission, which investigated the tragedy in detail, said they showed "no sense of urgency" despite hearing gunshots on a school campus. And unlike Coral Springs police, who every year trained to respond to active shooters, BSO only held active-shooter drills every three years.

Israel was criticized fiercely - including by this editorial board - for his decision to change BSO policy to give deputies the discretion, rather than the duty, to confront an active shooter. It turns out, however, that other Florida sheriffs had a similar policy, which Israel says was necessary to avoid compelling a deputy to walk into a trap.

However, following criticism in the investigating commission's initial report, he changed the word "may" to "shall." The policy, maintained by his successor, allows for "very limited extenuating circumstances" when a sole deputy might have to wait for reinforcements.

Israel might never have been removed had he taken responsibility for what happened, rather than credit for the response, which the Sun Sentinel's reporting proved to be untrue. For BSO's response was his responsibility, if not his fault. There is a difference.

Neither can Israel's boastful defense in the days that followed be forgotten. We can only hope he's since learned some humility. We saw hopeful signs during our interview.

Now the question is whether Tony is a suitable sheriff.

The governor's hasty choice

DeSantis chose poorly in his haste to keep a campaign promise to suspend Israel days after taking office. He knew little about Tony other than that he was then a Republican, and that he had been recommended by a Parkland parent.

There's no sign that the governor questioned whether Tony's time at Coral Springs PD - which he left after 11 years as a sergeant - qualified him to manage an entity as enormous and complex as the Broward Sheriff's Office. Only a cursory records check was done, rather than a proper background investigation.

Even so, there was a place on the form where Tony should have revealed the shooting.

Living in a rough section of Philadelphia, he had shot and killed a neighbor, 18, who he says was threatening his life and the life of his brother. A newspaper reported that he was taken into custody. A juvenile court found him blameless and apparently expunged the record. Now he quibbles that it was not technically an arrest because of his age.

Law enforcement is not just another line of work. Police have a license to kill. DeSantis was entitled to know that Tony had already killed. But for the reporting of the Florida Bulldog, an online investigative news site, it might still be a secret.

Asked his reaction to the revelations, DeSantis told reporters in May: "It's not like he's my sheriff. I didn't even know the guy."

Decisions to withhold information from the governor - and to swear that false answers on law enforcement documents were "true and correct"- came from the man Tony is today, not the teenager he was in Philadelphia.

A referendum on the governor

The governor didn't just bungle Israel's replacement. He mishandled the suspension itself, which also faulted Israel for BSO's response to the mass shooting at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport the year before.

The special master who reviewed DeSantis's suspension order for the Florida Senate concluded that the governor had failed to prove a single charge.

"Insistence is all the governor gives," wrote Dudley Goodlette, a respected Republican lawyer from Naples who once chaired the House Judiciary Committee.

Goodlette said it would be an "unworkable precedent" to remove the sheriff over the failures of those who responded to the school. As for the airport incident, he said the deputy stationed there had reacted promptly to arrest the killer.

In disregarding Goodlette's legal advice, the Senate turned the Broward Sheriff's Office into a partisan trophy. It voted 25-15, mostly along party lines, to support the Republican governor by removing the Democratic sheriff. Although DeSantis had chosen a Black to replace a white sheriff, Broward's two Black senators voted to reinstate Israel, as did the three who are white.

At last word, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement was investigating whether Tony broke the law by omitting the Philadelphia incident from the affidavit he submitted for his background check.

Citing our editorial calling for his resignation or suspension because of his non-disclosure, Tony declined our invitation to a joint candidate interview. Israel accepted, along with rival Al Pollock, a retired sheriff's colonel. We separately interviewed Andrew Smalling and Willie Jones together. Santiago Vazquez was unable to attend. You can view the videos online.

Of note, Israel retains significant support among Broward's Black politicians and opinion leaders. They credit him with always listening and working with them to stop the schoolhouse-to-prison pipeline. They resent that DeSantis replaced a Democratic sheriff with a Republican appointee who was not known in Broward. Tony is now a registered Democrat.

For many, this election is as much a referendum on DeSantis as it is on Israel and Tony.

Tony's tenure and temper

Tony's problems go beyond the past that he concealed. He twice lost his temper with deputies grieving the death of a colleague from COVID-19 - first at the hospital, then at the funeral home. Abruptly and rashly, he suspended Jeff Bell, president of the deputy sheriffs' union, after Bell accused him of not giving officers enough masks and other protective equipment against the coronavirus.

Even if Tony considered the criticism unfair, as perhaps it was, he should have had the maturity to bear it.

Earlier, he lost his temper with members of the Tamarac City Commission over their desire to have a third deputy barred from policing there following the rough arrest of a 15-year-old Taravella High School freshman. Tony, who had already suspended two others, barked back. "I will not stand here as if I'm suspect to anything. I will not be lectured to."

He also criticized the state attorney for dismissing the charges against the student.

Now, Tony's advertising touts him as a terror for rogue cops. But to use the cases of men whom he has fired or suspended as political fodder jeopardizes the successful prosecution of the misdemeanor charges against three of them.

Moreover, Tony waited two days past a deadline in state law to suspend a sergeant whom he accused of failing to react during the Parkland shooting. An arbitrator has ordered the man restored to duty with substantial back pay.

Poorly executed discipline is as bad as none at all.

Public and private dealings

How Tony spends the public's money has also raised questions.

He gave a $750,000 contract for bleeding control kits to a South Carolina company, North American Rescue LLC, with which he had had a side business relationship. Blue Spear Solutions, formed by Tony and his wife, marketed North American's products. Recently, Tony's affiliated PAC, Broward First, reported contributions of $5,000 and $10,000 that the Florida Bulldog traced to the founder and an employee of North American Rescue.

Tony refused to comment when the Bulldog asked about the sizable pay raises he had given to five BSO employees who moonlight for Blue Spear, which his wife runs.

Broward First, which has raised more than $1 million to support Tony, got much of it in a single $500,000 contribution from Donald Sussman, a Fort Lauderdale hedge fund investor. That's more than the entire $347,725 raised by Israel's PAC.

As for direct contributions to their campaigns, Israel and Tony lead the field with $153,205 and $163,611 respectively. Pollock trails them with $96,290.

Tony was in private life five years ago when he and his wife posed semi-nude for photographs at what appears to be a swingers club in Miami. Granted, public officials are entitled to private lives, but children can find these raunchy photographs on the internet. And swingers clubs hardly represent our community's values. We assume DeSantis didn't know about that, either.

The other candidates

Among the other Democratic candidates, we were particularly impressed with Andrew Smalling, a former captain and acting major in the sheriff's office - and a former chief in Lauderhill - who is now a faculty member and assistant dean at the Broward College Institute for Public Safety.

Smalling, 58, has constructive positions on reforms in criminal law and police practices, especially recruiting. He was the only candidate to talk about the excessive militarization of civilian police agencies and their emphasis on a "warrior mentality." He likely would be a leading candidate were the position being filled by appointment, as it should be, so that political connections and fund-raising wouldn't be factors. Regrettably, Florida doesn't allow that option and Smalling's campaign has gained little traction.

Pollock, who is 66 and lives in Davie, is an experienced law enforcement officer who has support from the unions representing deputies, sergeants, firefighters and paramedics. The jailers' union backs Israel. None of BSO's unions have endorsed Tony.

In our candidate interview, we questioned whether Pollock would be tough enough in renegotiating contracts that make it difficult to discipline or remove dubious officers.

Pollock and Israel are both harshly critical of Tony, but we believe only Israel has enough political support to defeat him.

The sheriff employs nearly 6,000 people for patrol and investigations, firefighting and rescue, regional communications, maintaining four jails and operating 911. The budget is almost $1 billion. It is a demanding job that calls for much judgment, experience and integrity, as well as for sufficient political skills to get elected.

The remaining Democratic candidates are Santiago Vazquez and Willie Jones. Jones, 65, retired from the BSO. He calls for building better relations between the command staff and rank and file. He ran a distant second to Israel in the 2016 Democratic primary.

Vazquez, 51, is a 23-year veteran of the BSO, who ran against Israel as a Republican four years ago. He did not participate in our joint interview with Smalling and Jones.

We encourage you to read all of the candidates' questionnaires and view our interviews with them online.

Editorials are the opinion of the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board and written by one of its members or a designee. The Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Rosemary O'Hara, Dan Sweeney, Steve Bousquet and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson.

-----

Dave 
David B. Smith 

Friday, July 28, 2017

Guess who finally decided to stop playing #RipVanWinkle re #DebbieWassermanSchultz on #ImranAwan scandal and start reporting the news, instead of finessing it? The South Florida press corps. But how long will that last? Experience suggests not long at all!





The South Florida's news media has finally decided to stop playing slumbering #RipVanWinkle re #DebbieWassermanSchultz and the continuing scandal involving her now-fired staffer #Imran Awan that touches on national security and DWS's longstanding sense of entitlement, and actually start reporting the news, instead of finessing it.
But how long will that last, especially in the heat and humidity of the South Florida summer? Based on first-hand personal experience, I'd say not very long at all!

What follows below are just a few of the many, many examples of the South Florida news media -newspaper, TV and radio- and their long history of censoring negative news about the thin-skinned FL-23 Congresswoman based in Broward County, impolite and impolitic Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

For you newcomers to the blog, especially people living too far from South Florida to know or appreciate this basic point of how the powerful always protect themselves, despite the fact that FL-23's DWS and feckless and incompetent FL-24's Frederica Wilson represent adjoining Congressional Districts in Broward, and decry the ills of gerrymandering whenever asked, they represent two very different worlds of South Florida, politics and the Democratic Party.

Because of gerrymandering, DWS has a CD that reaches down into very affluent Aventura, a never-ending source of tremendous amounts of loot for the DNC and the national Democratic Party Establishment, despite it being in Miami-Dade County.
Wilson on the other hand gets a CD that stretches from Liberty City and Overtown in Miami to parts of western Hallandale Beach, a city located on the ocean and in another county.

So much for the "compactness" we were promised when drawing up political districts in Florida. So why is this?

It's simple. This arrangement ensures that nearly every single African-American voter immediately north of Downtown Miami and in southeast Broward County is in FL-24 and that nearly every single Jewish voter in northeast Miami-Dade County and southeast Broward County is in FL-23.

For Miami's Black political Establishment, the crew that has done such an abysmal job of bringing tangible resources and power to bear upon that position under Carrie Meek and her son, Kendrick, this enclave arrangement also ensures that no one from wealthy Aventura ever runs against Wilson or Miami's Black political Establishment.
They have it for keeps, to do with whatever they want.

We all know that summer is when South Florida's news media, even its Junior Varsity team's members, take a LONG snoozy siesta and says mañana whenever you inform them about something that's of public concern.
Mañana, Dave, mañana!

No, during the summer, the typical South Florida news reporter, esp. TV reporters, will only snap into place and act old school jurnalism when there's a strong chance that a hurricane will hit South Florida, or some place nearby.
Otherwise, they don't want to be bothered with pesky things like salient facts, incriminating photos and video or examples of hypocrisy and entitlement among the political classes until after Labor Day.
They need their summer slumber!

Personally, one of the more frustrating things that I've had to grudgingly accept as my reality here in South Florida during the past 13-plus years -since I returned to the area after living and working in the Washington, D.C. area for 15 years, including constantly being on Capitol Hill and knowing well its history, personalities and good and bad sides- has been the confounding and counter-intuitive way that the South Florida news media, both print and electronic, has covered influential but controversial Broward County-centric Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Most of the South Florida press corps is so cowed by here that they are practically DWS "pets," genuflecting on cue and prostrating themselves to show her that they know she's the dominant animal. They will do whatever she wants.

This is, presumably, since the local press won't admit this publicly, in order for them to maintain access to this thin-skinned, temperamental and vindictive womanwith the big mouth, as well as with her staff, who are known for turning the screws on people, including pushing back hard on the news media whenever they get too close to the inconvenient truth.

In most areas of the country, and certainly in the 1940's, '50's and '60's films that today's reporters often watched as kids, possibly for career inspiration as they got older, that sort of treatment by an influential power broker only strengthens the resolve of the press to dig harder and to not be afarid of pushing back, regardless of the power weld by the bully.
In South Florida, though, meek reporters routinely roll over and play dead when DWS asks them to.
Newspaper Editorial Boards, too.

And it's been this way for many, many years.

It's no understatement on my part when I say that that I've written so many pointed things over the years about #DWS and her frequently frustrating, self-righteous and often self-sabotaging behavior towards her constituents here in Southeast Broward County and in next-door Aventura, that I even forget that I've written about some aspects of her dark side.

I've written about her antics with facts and precision and shone a light on her real track record and motivations in office, not swallowed whole the rose-colored view of her offered up by South Florida's news media, especially among young, female reporters who are so easily fooled into thinking that they are all on the same team.
(Like the litany of cancer stories that came up at a very convenient time for her.)

It's crazy I know, but the treament DWS receives from most female reporters in South Florida is beyond a publicist's wildest dream.

There's very, very little journalism actually taking place.

So whether in fact-filled comments with multiple independent links on blogs like The Miami Broward News Times, back when they used to be a source of genuine conversation and heated discussion among Broward County's public policy and political crowd, including me, because of the hard work and snooping done by investigative reporter Bob Norman, now of Local10 News; here on my blog at Hallandale Beach Blog; and more than anywhere else, in countless personal conversations I've had with so many people I know, trust and respect, irregardless of politics or issues, so many of whom were Broward insiders, but people whom would confide to you, sotto voce, that even though they were liberal Democrats in South Florida, they hated DWS personally, and resented the fact that she always seemed so eager to make enemies instead of allies.

She literally can't help herself.

There are dozens of examples from which to choose from, so I will only mention a few older ones here to set up the current story involving her and her former staffer that paints her as the worst sort of DC insider -the insider with a sense of entitlement and who likes to bully others simply because she can, and she knows that the press will not call her on it.

Trust me, DWS is THE Mean Girl.

Like this in 2013:



Or 2014:


Or 2015:

















Here I was specifically referencing the South Florida Sun-Sentinel completely ignoring the waves of very negative comments abt DWS from the Chicago office of Obama's HQ, that were in Glenn Thrush's book.




In 2016...
































What's old becomes new again with DWS: DENY, DENY, DENY, DENY...


To Debbie Wasserman Schultz, there's no such thing as non-partisan, as I write here below, in 2009, in blue, regarding her voting against her own bill regarding swimming pool safety for children becaue she didn't want a Senate Republican who was the Senate sponsor of her bill, George Allen of Virgina, to be able to have any credit for it when he was running for re-election.

So a good bill that helped kids died because to her, the politics mattered more.

But her press secretary at the time hated for people to know that, so he furiously wrote all sorts of BS warnings to the media to try to cover her trail.

Even tried to bait me a few times publicly.
But he wasnt prepared for me to refute his crazy notions by simply linking to reporters who made my points in much-larger forums.

But the facts are there for anyone to see, all you have to do is open your eyes.


For those of you who want some much-needed critical perspective on South Florida media darling DWS, please see "Pennsylvania Avenue: Profiles in Backroom Power: Making Washington Work Again" by John Harwood, chief Washington correspondent for CNBC; reporter, The New York Times, and Jerry Seib, Washington bureau chief, The Wall Street Journal. See Chapter 6 titled The Fundraising-Phenom Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

You can also do a Look Inside at www.amazon.com/ and find lots of interesting items. It's telling that in the year 2009, a real nobody from a non-competitive CD, someone with little positive impact on important national public policy issues, can be so important in Congress and SO popular on cable TV, esp. MSNBC. All because her real power comes almost entirely from her ability to generate campaign funds from well-heeled Jewish donors in South Florida and around the country, where she's flown around as part of Dem 'dog and pony' fundraisers to get Jewish donors in those CDs to give to their local Dem incumbent or nominee.
I've got lots of moderate DLC friends all around the country who were Capitol Hill staffers who've received those fundraiser invites starring her from their local Dem party, and they grimace, because they know that giving money to an event she's at only encourages her and the money folks at the DNC to be more abrasive, which doesn't help smart and hardworking Dems from competitive districts, who will get but a pittance. This book has an entire chapter on DWS and her ethics and overwhelming ambition and fundraising prowess, and is a book that garnered good to very good reviews, had a national media tour, and was written by two well-respected veteran reporters from The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
It was even on the front page of The New York Times Book Review! Despite all that, though, the book itself and the stories it tells about DWS have NEVER been mentioned in The Miami Herald or the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Or mentioned in a TV newscast or on a TV public affairs program.
Not in print, not online, not even a blog post entry!
What are the odds of that? To me, given how the local media has always bent over backwards to be pals with her even before her recent cancer revelation, this lack of context is even more troubling, and quite telling about the true low state of journalism in South Florida. Not a single South Florida reporter, editor, columnist, producer or anchor has EVER mentioned it. And I've checked!
I've even asked well-placed people I know at the newspapers and the local TV shows. Nope! I particularly call your attention to page 80 re a proposed pool-safety bill she co-authored. Well, despite having bipartisan support and President Bush's interest in signing it to make it the law, in order to politically attack Sen. George Allen of Vrginia, one of the Senate co-sponsors and a Republican running for re-election, she let the bill die, rather than let something become a law that EVERYONE supported. That's DWS -she puts politics above public safety!
And still South Florida media ignores the issue and the book. Harwood and Seib discussed the book and called attention to her (creepy) efforts on the Diane Rehm Show on NPR from May 15, 2008, which generated some calls disgusted with the ethical antics of DWS. It's at www.wamu.org/programs/dr/08/05/15.php and is available in both Real Audio and Windows Media.
After you listen to it, you'll really wonder how DWS generated so much disgust with well-informed national listeners while South Florida media completely ignored what she did, or made excuses for her. Sadly, most South Florida reporters don't really want to be adversaries or thorns to elected officials and govt. employees, they want to be their pals, which explains why they are usually so easily co-opted.
And it explains why so much of what's printed and broadcast is an insult to reasonable, well-informed citizens.

Quick: Try doing an archival search for the Harwood & Seib book on the Miami Herald or South Florida Sun-Sentinel's website, using whatever parameters you want: title, authors, etc. Knock yourself out!

It won't have any results because it's NEVER been mentioned.
Q.E.D.
I have access to their archives and trust me, it's not there.

Page 80 
But her role as a "team player" in Democratic election strategy can also impede her legislative work.  Among the principal initiatives of her first term was a pool-safety bill designed to set more stringent rules for barriers around pools, and the kinds of drains manuafacturersare permitted to install. Battling uphill in a Republican Congress, she
obtained support from the swimming-pool industry and a prominent Republican co-sponsor -Senator George Allen of Virginia.

In the run-up to the 2006 election, Senate democrats wanted to hold up progress on the bill for a singularly partisan reason. Allen was in a dead-heat race against challenger Jim Webb; with partisan control of the chamber potentially hanging in the balance, Democrats didn't want to provide ammunition favorable to Allen, which he could use with Virginia voters against Webb.

Senate Democratic leaders "didn't want to give Allen a victory before the election," Wasserman Schultz says matter-of-factly. And she was in no position to object. "I was co-chair of the 'red-to-blue' campaign. It was hard for me to say, Give one of your most targeted
members a big victory." The result: a bill that had majority support in both chambers of Congress didn't become law.
Wasserman Schultz insisted she'd win passage of the bill later in any case.

And the funny thing is, this book doesn't even say anything about DWS making an ass out of herself for saying something that was not true at a June 2005 House Judiciary Comm. hearing on The Patriot Act that was nationally televised on C-SPAN, that I just happened to watch LIVE at home, not their numerous encores so beloved by liberal bloggers.

Yep, she almost had brought formal ethics charges against her by the Chair of the committee, Jim Sensenbrenner.
In fact, you should read what it says about this matter in the Congressional Record of the time.

Now, for the latests scandal...
















































Dave