Showing posts with label Ilene Lieberman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ilene Lieberman. Show all posts

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Broward Comm Albert Jones and the future of the incompatible Diplomat LAC -and what does he really know about the lies spread by HB's Anthony Sanders?

Obviously, I've been talking to people all over the
county a lot about the Diplomat LAC proposal,
which, as I constantly remind everyone I speak
to about it, Hallandale Beach City Hall only placed
on the city's website for citizens to read 28 hours
before the first vote in mid-December.

One of the sub-plots that's come up is how this
may affect former Dania mayor and current
interim Broward Commissioner Albert C. Jones'
political future, if any, as he seeks to get elected
to a position he was appointed to by Gov. Crist.

There are some larger issues for people all over
the county to contemplate.

If, by virtue of his YES vote on March 23rd,
he believes that it is perfectly acceptable for
25-30 story residential buildings to be located
adjacent to single-family residential areas,
some only 25 feet away, will he also be voting
this same way for future development applications
in the rest of Broward County, including
the cities of Fort Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines,
Hollywood, Coral Springs, Miramar, Plantation,
Sunrise and Davie, as well as the entirety of the
Broward Commission District he hopes to
represent in the future as an elected
Commissioner?

If not, why then is he forcing Hallandale Beach
and nearby Hollywood citizens to bear this
particular burden when they are opposed to it,
and are already physically hamstrung by not
only having geographical barriers, but also
among the single worst traffic to be currently
found in all of South Florida?

How is it that he imagines having thousands
more residents in that area will not directly
affect the ability of people to evacuate when
the sites in question are ALL mandatory
hurricane evacuation areas
?

There are many questions you could ask him,
but this might be the first

Please explain your rationale for your
March 23rd
vote and why Broward residents
should not expect you to vote similarly for
future applications if you are elected.

Or, do you plan to make exceptions for other
cities, but not in this particular case with respect
to Hallandale Beach and Hollywood residents?


Another question to ponder is why would
politically-active Broward residents who live
outside of the 9th District currently represented
by Jones, especially in Hollywood or Hallandale
Beach, consider making small campaign
contribution to him if he is a solid vote FOR
developers' out-of-scale plans of a sort that
caused the Broward Planning Council's
professional staff to recommend DENIAL
of the proposal?

Well, they wouldn't if he votes for the
Diplomat
on April 27th whereas they might consider it
if he votes against it.
Hmm-m-m...

Then again, if he votes for the Diplomat,
it's highly likely that they and their law firms,
lobbyists and consultants will show him
some love with campaign contributions
while those very same politically-active
residents of the county will contribute to
one of his many opponents.
That's politics: votes matter.

I personally think that April 12th or so is
plenty of time for him to have decided what
he's going to do, one way or the other on
the second go-round with this.

If he appears set on rejecting the community
again, as far as I'm concerned, that's it for
him and I personally plan to go to Plan B
with Comm. Jones.

That's the plan where
his opponents
start asking these questions publicly
themselves
, and
he doesn't get elected.

According to the website of the Broward County
Supervisor of Elections (SOE) Jones still
does NOT appear on the official candidates list.
http://www.browardsoe.org/electioncandidates.aspx?eid=89

That same website notes that as of today,
the registered voters here break down as follows:
Democrat: 544,329
Republican: 243,802
Other: 240,806
Total: 1,028,937

Nobody here but us scorpions:
For what it's worth, if anyone out there was
thinking of whom they could contact on the
Commission to try to prevent this proposal
from going thru, I believe that any time
and energy directed at Ilene Lieberman or
Stacey Ritter is completely wasted.

That's especially the case after many people
from around the county who have dealt with
them in the past, inc. elected officials,
have contacted me and said that after hearing
and reading what's already transpired, they
agree with me that Lieberman and Ritter
literally can't help themselves.

You know, like the scorpion and the frog.
Except in this case, they're both scorpions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scorpion_and_the_Frog

These two still imagine themselves able to
pick and choose economic winners and losers
throughout the county based on whom they
know or who is involved in a project, i.e.
crony capitalism, the preferred method
employed at Hallandale Beach City Hall
to dispense taxpayer and CRA funds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crony_capitalism

The Rodstrom Factor:
The fact that we never heard any specifics about
why some people in Broward thought Comm.
John Rodstrom
would abstain last Tuesday
-just a feeling?- and still can't say, is sufficient
proof to me that Rodstrom is also a lost cause.

Rodstrom
is also involved with the Margaritaville
bid in Hollywood's Johnson Street RFP that
I personally find so unattractive and objectionable,
and may will be at Hollywood City Hall on April 7th
at 4 p.m., when the entire City Commission sees
the presentations and formally asks questions for
the first time.
I'll be there also, of course.

To me, for better or worse, the entire fight for
the Diplomat LAC proposal lies with Comm.
Albert C. Jones.
Period.

It would be great if someone could convince
Jones
that what is really going on in HB, with
Sanders & Co. seemingly trying to benefit either
financially or professionally -or both- from every
single proposed project in HB, thru so-called
'job programs' -regardless of how many
actual jobs are created, and to the
apparent
exclusion of other groups involvement
-
is not our opinion, it's a verifiable fact.

But you have to be willing to admit that
seeing
is believing.

Some well-informed people throughout the county
tell me that just as is true with Comm. Diana
Wasserman-Rubin
, Comm. Jones does NOT
really want to ask too many questions about HB
Comm. Anthony Sanders.

You know, like the entire South Florida news media,
save Sun-Sentinel columnist Michael Mayo?

Whether about the curious sale of his family property
to the city for far more than its appraised value
-for purposes that are still not at all clear-
or ask why so many of his associates and pals
seem to be getting sweetheart deals from the city
that seem absurd on their face and unpopular
with taxpayers.

For instance, City Manager Good deciding on
his own, without any input from the elected City
Commission, to give $25,000 to someone for
a summer camp that is not a non-profit.

Something that elected city commissioners only
found out about a week after the fact.

So, does anyone out there have any idea of how
much money in grants or loans that brother-and-sister
act Deborah Brown and John Brown have
separately received from the City of HB over
the past few years?

She's the woman, of course, who got the $25k
last year without the public or elected officials
knowing about it 'till it was too late.
See http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Hallandale-Beach/deborah-brown-P1332185.aspx

Until a few weeks ago, I just assumed that Zamar
was a non-profit, but since it's incorporated,
it's clearly not, so why did they get the money
instead of someone else?
Better yet, if you have nothing to hide, why was
this kept from the public?

The fact that the city's CRA has been used as
an ATM for so long by HB City Hall for their friends,
and more recently, by Sanders' myriad acolytes,
without actually alleviating poverty or blight,
is going to come out sooner rather than later.

Comm. Jones needs to decide if he supports
the empty promises of the Diplomat and their
apologists like Sanders, or concrete results.

It's time for him to be a Profile in Courage
and do the right thing, or seal his fate with
Broward voters.
Late this afternoon I was
informed that:
Comm. Sanders was STILL
going around town, esp. churches, saying
the Diplomat LAC is good for "their community,"
but people who know the true facts are downright
insulted by the drop-in-the-bucket proposal
for Affordable Housing, and the Diplomat's
clear preference to not have the affordable
housing actually be at their actual site.

Naturally, they want to export it off-site just like
Gulfstream Park, Magna and Forest City did.
So, who profits from this, exactly?

Despite what you may have heard elsewhere.
the Palms Coalition decided not to support
the Diplomat LAC proposal as a group.

I'll bet that even Diana Wasserman-Rubin
knows
this, but will she actually show-up at
the
NW quadrant meeting on Monday at
6:30 p.m., at the city's Hepburn Center,
to see what the community actually thinks
about this?


It should be interesting to see what sort of
turn-out they get from their paid puppets,
or even whether the South Florida news media,
esp. TV, continues their apparent boycott of
this compelling story.

In fact, perhaps because it is scheduled for NW,
the news media will show-up, albeit, like the
much-needed military support that was too late
getting to Custer.

One thing you can count on though is that
the Diplomat's interests will be employing
a full-court press at this meeting to try to
spin it their way, with the same invisible faces
we never see at City Commission or CRA
meetings suddenly popping-up and telling
us how much they want it.

Some people will always put their own financial
interests ahead of the community's greater good,
and that's exactly what we'll see on Monday night.


I'll tell you who those people are.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Plucky underdog HB activists live to fight another day as Broward County Commission votes 4-4 on Diplomat LAC

Hallandale Beach Chicken of the Sea coming home to roost?
No, plucky Hallandale Beach residents know better than
to crow yet and prematurely count their chickens!

Fowl weather at Hallandale Beach may be very bad news
for Hallandale Beach City Hall and their lapdog acolytes.
February 14, 2008 photo by
South Beach Hoosier.

I'm very, very pleased to say tonight that on Wednesday,
I will be posting my pithy comments
and analysis,
along with some photos and video,
of today's important
Broward County Commission
meeting on the Diplomat
LAC
proposal, which resulted in a series of 4-4 votes
on various motions,
meaning that under the County's
rules, the next
step will be yet another meeting before
the
County Commission, on April 13th.

Three more weeks to try to peel away one of the
other
county commissioners.

Political drama!

Stacey Ritter
and Ilene Lieberman are lost causes
in more ways than one as I've mentioned
here previously,
and didn't even need to be in the
room for those of us
opposed to the Diplomat's
condo towers to know
they'd already made up
their mind, as I predicted here
-and I was right.


They weren't there, but you could feel the aloofness
and condescension over the phone line.

The over-confident
Diplomat officials, unctuous
union lackeys and the high-priced lawyers,
lobbyists
and consultants they've been paying for
months left
the Broward Commission Chambers
in shock!


You see, they were counting their chickens
BEFORE
they were cooked!

Monday, February 1, 2010

South Florida news media ignores Broward Courthouse Taskforce shenanigans planned for Tuesday by Usual Suspects, not taxpayers; Judge Victor Tobin enlists legal eagles to come to rescue

So, did you hear about the Broward County Commission meeting on Tuesday morning at 10 a.m. where the future of the Broward Courthouse will be discussed?
Hundreds of millions of dollars are involved.

If not, don't worry, that's the way the Broward County Commission wants it.
In that regard, they rely heavily on the apathetic South Florida news media, who'll no doubt make
excuses, after-the-fact, for why they haven't mentioned this topic AT ALL before the meeting
actually happens.

Meet the New Media, Same as the Old Media!

Here's how it looks on tomorrow's agenda, but I have it printed out in full at the bottom.


15.






Attachments

Exhibit 1 - Final Report 2009

Exhibit 2 - Master Plan Phases 1 - 3

Exhibit 3 - New Courthouse - Conceptual Footprint

Exhibit 4 - Summary of Borrowing Options

Exhibit 5 - Comparison of Voted & Non-Voted Debt


Consider this.
This is what Comm. Ken Keechl said exactly a year ago about the Courthouse.
Sounds pretty realistic.
http://www.broward.org/kenkeechl/02_09_newsletter.pdf

But that was before the rigged Broward Courthouse Task Force, under Comm. Ilene Lieberman,
had time to really work in earnest to figure-out some way that they could legally evade the referendum that would be required if the Commission voted to make this a bond issue, with voters getting the ultimate thumbs up or down.
And we know that would be a heavy thumbs down, don't we?

Broward County Judicial Complex
Broward County Courthouse, with jail north of it, to the left. With delightful river-views!

You can be excused for wondering why you haven't heard anything about Tuesday morning's Commission meeting that will discuss the Courthouse.
It's not your fault.
Really.

Neither the Herald or the Sun-Sentinel have mentioned this subject in print or online since last September, when the Guest Op-Ed below, purported to have been written by Comm. Stacy Ritter, was published in the Sun-Sentinel.
Whether she actually wrote this or just signed it is not the point.
The real point is that once again, on something very important, South Florida's news media has shown they were sleeping on the job.

Not that anyone in local TV has anything to brag about in this.
Are you kidding?

Did you EVER see anything last year on TV about the ties that the members of the Lieberman-led Taskforce had to the Broward legal establishment here, who desperately want a brand new pony?
Preferably, with a brand-new barn and a lifetime supply of feed.
On your dime.

Nope.
There never was one

Did you ever read in the newspaper or see anything on local TV about how Comm. Lieberman put herself on the committee, and thus ends up with two votes on this matter?

Ever read or hear anything about why Comm. Stacy Ritter appointed Bruce Rogow to the Courthouse Task Force after she'd earlier appointed him to the Charter Review Commission, which
just ended in 2008?

Is there really such a complete lack of qualified people in Broward County -or genuine fear of diversity of opinions?- that the same old faces have to appear, over-and-over?

Bruce Rogow, really?
The same guy who continually made ridiculous alibis and excuses for Broward's elected officials, over-and-over, in the Charter Review Committee meetings?

The same Bruce Rogow who was recently making $375 an hour off of Hallandale Beach taxpayers for reasons that most of the HB City Commission still can't logically explain?
Yes.

In case you forgot, that's the same Lieberman I continually wrote about last year on my blog
that didn't follow basic aspects of the state's Sunshine Laws, and instead, tried to fool
the public by arranging for the agenda and assorted public docs for the last meeting, which should've been online days before, to be placed online HOURS AFTER the
last meeting was over.
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/search?q=Ilene+Lieberman

Really.
Not that they actually had the final public meeting listed online days before the meeting, since they didn't, and which I wrote about at the time.
And Lieberman was the one in charge -the Chair.

The answer to that long-winded question is also a big fat NOPE.
There never was one story about any of those aspects of the Task Force
Now you know the truth.

There you have it, a snapshot of South Florida's not so gung-ho news media, circa February 2010
-asleep at the wheel.

The Jordana Mishory article from the Daily Business Review last week that I link to below features one of the most gallingquotes you'll ever see.

In case you've been under a rock, Judge Victor Tobin is the genius in charge of the statewide task force investigating corruption.

Mishory
writes: "He also encouraged the lawyers to run for state Legislature, saying nonlawyers in Tallahassee don’t understand the justice system and the separation
of powers."


So now you know what citizen taxpayers are really up against.

I'll be at the meeting tomorrow afternoon for the public session that starts ar 2 p.m., filming the drama surrounding Agenda item 15.
Should be pretty interesting to watch the Broward Commissioners engage in verbal gymnastics to do
what they always wanted to do, despite Broward citizens being unalterably opposed by large margins.

But the reality is this -the Commissioners have contributor friends who need the contracting work,
so don't be surprised to hear some pretty crazy news emerge from Andrews Avenue tomorrow.


South Florida Sun-Sentinel
BROWARD COURTHOUSE NEEDS REPLACING NOW

September 30, 2009

When I became Broward County's mayor almost a year ago, I made rebuilding our courthouse a priority.

We are one hurricane away from not having a courthouse. Engineers say that the roof could blow off in a moderate hurricane, leaving us with no place to handle trials. In that case, we would be forced to replace the courthouse during an emergency at whatever cost is charged.

Almost everybody who steps into the aging building, from witnesses to the Sun-Sentinel Editorial Board, has repeatedly said a new courthouse is needed.

Why? The courthouse is the lynchpin of Broward's public safety, where everything from divorces to traffic tickets is decided. If you get robbed, or are hurt in a traffic accident, justice is found at the courthouse. The problems with the 60-year-old building are myriad and threaten public safety.

Because of overcrowding, criminal defendants are in close contact with the public. There are rats, roaches and corroding pipes, which leak sewer water. Bathrooms are often out of order. The aging elevators sometimes require two dozen service calls a week. The overloaded electrical system dates back to the 1950s.

In 2006, voters turned down a $500 million-plus courthouse plan. Voters believed it was too big and too expensive. Since then, the courthouse has gotten worse - closed at least three times because of burst pipes. The flooding caused ceilings to collapse, electrical equipment to fail and required extra deputies to transport prisoners to makeshift courtrooms.

To keep patching the building together is costly and wasteful. With this in mind, I appointed a task force under County Commissioner Ilene Lieberman to tackle this decades-long problem. To insure the public that those on the task force would not benefit financially, no one doing business with the county was a member. After multiple public hearings and hours of expert testimony, the task force developed a sensible plan:

Smaller and less expensive than the 2006 rejected proposal, it would cost $328 million, down from more than $500 million. It will be 17 stories rather than 25 stories, and 675,000 square feet, rather than 893,000 square feet.

It is doable. The County Commission approved the plan in early August. We already have $120 million set aside to pay for the building. As time passes, the need for a new courthouse only increases, and will just get more expensive the longer we wait. We need it now.

Stacy Ritter is mayor of Broward County.

---------
FYI: Jordana Mishory is a Medill grad.
Daily Business Review

Broward Courthouse
Chief judge considers legal remedies if county rejects bond

By Jordana Mishory
January 22, 2010

Broward Chief Circuit Judge Victor Tobin is recruiting lawyers to attend a Broward County Commission meeting on a bond issue for courthouse construction and is considering legal remedies to ensure the county provides a safe and adequate building, he said Thursday in his state of the circuit speech.

Tobin said drastic matters may be needed to deal with the decrepit wing of the downtown Fort Lauderdale courthouse, but he stopped short of threatening a lawsuit.

Read the rest of the story at:
http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/news.html?news_id=60007

See other DBR stories on the Broward Courthouse at:
http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/related_news.html?cluster_id=980


http://205.166.161.204/agenda_publish.cfm?mt=ALL&get_month=2&get_year=2010&dsp=agm&seq=4651&rev=0&ag=165&ln=27918&nseq=&nrev=&pseq=4696&prev=0#ReturnTo27918

AI-4651 Item #: 15.
Broward County Commission Regular Meeting
Date: 02/02/2010
Director's Name: Pete Corwin
Department: County Administration

Information
Requested Action
MOTION TO DISCUSS and determine the method of financing for the new courthouse complex.
Why Action is Necessary
Board direction is required to determine how to fund the new courthouse complex.
What Action Accomplishes
Provides staff direction to take the necessary steps to finance a new courthouse.
Is this Action Goal Related

Previous Action Taken

Summary Explanation/ Background
Background

On August 5th, the Board approved the Courthouse Task Force’s final report (Exhibit 1). The Board agreed that a new courthouse should be constructed on County owned land at the corner of SE 6th Street and SE 1st Avenue; which is the site of the 400 space Judicial Garage. The Board also amended the agreement with Spillis Candela, Heery, Cartaya Joint Venture to design the new courthouse. The Board discussed the Task Force recommendation to fund the courthouse utilizing non-voted debt and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of voted and non-voted debt; however, the Board postponed a decision on financing the courthouse. The Mayor directed staff to bring the issue to the Board for determination.

Project Status

The consultant team has completed the architectural program totaling 674,000 sq ft to meet the space needs of the courthouse agencies plus one shell floor (34,000 sq ft) to provide for future expansion. The team also developed a master plan (Exhibit 2), consistent with the recommendations of the Task Force. The master plan provides for a judicial campus on County owned property that will meet the space needs of the courts for well over thirty years. The consultant team also developed over 30 design schemes for the courthouse footprint, which were reviewed by County staff with input from the courts. After detailed analysis using selection criteria which included site constraints, building and functional efficiency, natural lighting, way-finding, best practices, and cost , the team selected an “L” shape footprint (Exhibit 3) as the preferred conceptual configuration for the building. The 20 story structure will include 74 litigation spaces for judges and general masters; provide secure separation of the public, judges, inmates and juvenile detainees; centralize Court Administrator functions; include space for Clerk of Court and State Attorney functions; and will be an environmentally friendly and energy efficient building designed to achieve LEED certification.

The consultant team has initiated the schematic design phase of the project during which they will complete architectural massing and elevation studies to represent the preferred design solution for the building. Conceptual floor plans will be developed for each level during this phase, responding to the architectural program requirements. Preliminary project descriptions, with a narrative of engineering systems and material selections, will be provided so that a more detailed project cost can be prepared.

Schematic design will be completed in mid-March and will be followed by the design development and construction document phase to produce the design drawings used to bid the project. Since these drawings must conform to the most current building codes, staff does not recommend proceeding with design development until a financing plan is in place. If the project is delayed pending financing, the design development drawings would likely require significant and potentially costly modifications.

Project Costs
The following provides a summary of the $328 million projected project costs:

• Courthouse, Demolition, Landscaping, Connectors and 120 Secure Parking Spaces
($281.5 million)

• 1,380 Parking Spaces ($34.5 million)

• Remodel Midrise ($4 million)

• Additional North Regional Parking ($8 million)

Staff and the consultant team is committed to designing the project within the project budget including the prospect of bidding the project next year at a time when the construction market is expected to remain “soft”. In addition, the project estimate does not include a separate allocation for public art since the consultant team will integrate art into the design of the new courthouse. The cost to add parking to the North Regional Courthouse may be less than projected if we can add capacity within the existing structure.

As the project has taken shape over the past several months, several items have been indentified that will have to be taken into consideration when designing the courthouse and developing the detailed project budget. The initial project budget did not contemplate any remodeling in the East or North Wings. As the consultant completed the space program, it became clear that several State Attorney units that support judges in the North Wing (felony courts) should be located in the East or North Wings. By consolidating Court Administration and the administrative functions of the Clerk of Courts in the new courthouse, space can be freed up in the East and North Wings for the State Attorney. The team also identified additional work necessary to make the East Wing functional after the old courthouse is demolished. With the assistance of our construction project manager (Weitz), staff and the consultant team will design the courthouse so that the project is completed at or under the project budget.

Financing the New Courthouse

The County has $60 million in the budget for courthouse capital projects plus $60 million for a new jail which is not needed due to reductions in the inmate population. If additional jail capacity is needed in the future, the 700 bed Stockade can be reopened. By utilizing $120 million in cash, the County can reduce the amount of borrowed funds needed for the projects to approximately $208 million.

The key policy questions for the Board to address are:

• What is the best time and method to borrow the $208 million to finance the project?

• What funds will be used to pay the annual debt service on the bonds?

• What is the impact of the annual debt service payments on the millage rate and
taxpayers?

The County’s Financial Advisor prepared a summary of several borrowing options (Exhibit 4). While there are several options available to the County for financing the courthouse project, the fundamental choice is between voted and non-voted debt. There are pros and cons of each method.

Voted debt (General Obligation bonds) has several advantages. Debt service is paid with property taxes that are not included in the County’s General Fund and operating millage rate; interest rates are lower than non voted debt; and no debt service reserve is required.

The key advantage to non-voted debt is that financing can proceed immediately allowing the County to take advantage of a very soft construction market; take advantage of historically low interest rates; and utilize Build America Bonds before they expire December 31, 2010. Non-voted debt service payments are paid with general revenues and the millage required to fund debt service is included in the General Fund under the 10 mill cap limitation.

The total debt service on $208 million ranges from $12 to $14 million per year. The Court Facilities Fee can be used to pay $5 million per year of the debt service on the bonds ($1million/year from rent savings plus $4 million/year from increase in the fee). Therefore, by utilizing $5 million/year in courthouse facilities fees, the amount of property taxes needed to support the bonds is reduced to approximately $7 to $9 million per year.

A key variable in the annual debt service payments is whether the County issues Recovery Zone and Build America Bonds (BABs), which can significantly lower borrowing costs, but must be issued by December 31, 2010. The County has been allocated $40 million in Recovery Zone Bonds which provide a 45% credit towards interest payments. There is no limit on the amount of Build America Bonds that can be issued and they provide a 35% credit towards interest payments. The reduction in interest payments are based upon the Federal Government providing “rebates” and carry the risk that the Federal Government will suspend or eliminate the “rebates”. As shown in Exhibit 5, the annual rebate averages approximately $3 million per year. The Federal program is available for both voted and non-voted debt; the bonds are taxable; and bonds must be issued no later than December 31, 2010 unless the program is extended by Congress.

The County’s Financial Advisor compared four borrowing scenarios based upon current market conditions:

• Voted Debt with Build America Bonds

• Non-Voted Debt with Build America Bonds

• Voted Debt without Build America Bonds

• Non-Voted Debt without Build America Bonds

Based on current market conditions, Exhibit 5 calculates the total amount borrowed (including issuance, underwriters costs, and revenues); total average annual debt service; tax supported annual debt service (netting out the Courthouse Facility Fee and Federal interest “rebate”); the “all in” interest rate (TIC); and total debt service. The following chart summarizes the annual debt service and “all in” interest rate for each alternative:


OPTION ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE TIC
• Voted Debt with BAB’s $6.9 million 3.85%

• Non Voted Debt with BAB’s $7.5 million 4.11%

• Voted Debt w/o BAB’s $8.1 million 4.68%

• Non Voted Debt w/o BAB’s $9.3 million 5.34%



Based on current market conditions, the lowest cost option would be voted debt utilizing Build America Bonds; however, a non-voted issue utilizing Build America Bonds is more attractive than a GO issue without Build America Bonds.

Policy Questions
Given the information presented above:

1. What is the best time and method to borrow the $208 million to finance the project? Voted debt offers lower borrowing costs, but if the Board elects to finance the project with voted debt and voters do not approve the bond issue, the County could miss historically low interest rates, BAB rebates from the Federal Government and a soft construction market.

2. What funds will be used to pay the annual debt service on the bonds? The total debt service payments on $208 million will be approximately $12 to $14 million per year. Courthouse Facilities Fees will provide approximately $5 million per year. If voted debt is utilized, the difference will come directly from property taxes. If non-voted debt is utilized, general revenues will be pledged to make up the difference which ultimately impacts the general fund tax rate.

If the debt is incurred in the next 3 years, the increase in debt service payments can be offset by a $36.4 million per year decrease in voted debt service payments. In FY 10, total annual debt service taxes are $74.4 million and in FY 14 they will decrease to $38 million. These scheduled decreases in payments will occur as follows:

• FY11 $17.3 million

• FY12 $11.3 million

• FY13 $7.8 million

Total $36.4 million

3. What is the impact of the annual debt service payments on the millage rate and taxpayers? No matter which method of borrowing (voted or non-voted debt) is used, there will be an increase in debt service payments. If the debt is “voted”, the additional $7 to $9 million will be offset by the programmed $36.4 million decrease in existing voted debt service payments and likely result in a decrease in the “voted” millage rate depending on the tax roll for that year. If the debt is “non-voted”, the impact on the County operating budget and millage rate cannot be determined at this time, given the number of variables such as the tax roll, other increases/decreases in revenues and expenses, and the Board’s tax policy. The impact of the additional $7 to $9 million on the budget by itself would not require a supermajority vote since the County has developed ample capacity under the State-mandated maximum millage calculation by significantly reducing the County’s ad valorem tax levy each year for three years.

The following summarizes the impact on the average taxpayer based on the current combined millage rate (voted and non-voted) and current average taxable values:

• Current millage rate 5.3889 (4.889 operating plus .5 mills debt service)

• Less .25 mills decrease in voted debt service payments ($36.4 million/year)

• Plus .05 to .06 mills for new courthouse debt service payments ($7 to $9
million/year)

• Total millage rate – 5.1889 to 5.0789 (3.5% to 3.7% decrease)

• The impact of the $7 to $9 million debt service payment on the average
homeowner would be $8 per year, which would be offset by the reduction
of $37 per year in voted debt service payments over three fiscal years.

The Courthouse Task Force met on January 22nd and voted to reaffirm their recommendation that the Board utilize non-voted debt.

Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact/Cost Summary:
Total cost of courthouse projects is $328 million. There is $120 million available in the Capital Program in the courthouse and jail projects. The balance ($208 million) will be financed and supported by revenues generated in the Courthouse Facilities Fund and general operating revenues.

Attachments
Exhibit 1 - Final Report 2009
Exhibit 2 - Master Plan Phases 1 - 3
Exhibit 3 - New Courthouse - Conceptual Footprint
Exhibit 4 - Summary of Borrowing Options
Exhibit 5 - Comparison of Voted & Non-Voted Debt

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Ilene Lieberman, churlish chronic, self-interested obstructionist to common sense and ethics

Wednesday November 25th, 2009

Once again, below, clear evidence that Comm. Ilene
Lieberman
is playing her by now familiar role.
Not the role of pragmatic idealist, not the role of
reasonable compromise, but the role of obstructionist.

She waited until after the county Charter Review
Commission
made their recs last year before deciding
to offer up a measure that the County Auditor
-whom I have no quibble with- ought to be required
to makes financial estimates of the prospective costs
of ballot initiatives and referendums, and that such info
appear on the ballot.

There are lots of well-informed people in Broward
who are in complete agreement with me that
Comm. Lieberman came up with the proposal that
became an ordinance, at least in in part,to sink the
idea of having an independent, advisory MTA in
this area that could start making positive suggestions
based on what the public and transportation-users
think, not what box the county wants to put people in.

And by an advisory MTA, I mean one that was
composed of real taxpayers and which paid
proper heed to citizens, and which was NOT
the puppet play-thing of the County Commission
and their faceless bureaucratic MPO system,
which few citizens know about or understand.

That MPO system, while not without some smart
and well-meaning people, many of whom I've met,
is great in the abstract, but the reality is that it's
also the refuge of many bureaucratic drones who
give taxpayers and bus riders the back of their
hand, like they're laboratory rats.
Employees I'd like to see axed, toute-de-suite.

It's the last refuge of the dim-witted Joy Coopers
of the world, who say that everything should be
done thru MPO as a way of avoiding true
accountability, even while keeping parochial pols
in charge, due in large part to the
pervasive influence
of the
Broward League of Cities, which is too
great in my opinion.

For simple proof of this, go to the
Minutes of the
last public Charter Review Commission meeting,
April 9, 2008, 1 p.m.
http://www.broward.org/charter/pdf/crc_ph_agenda_04092009.pdf

Start at the public comments on page 6 and watch
what happens
when Joy Cooper is asked a series
of very reasonable questions by CRC members
Ted Mena and Michael C. Buckner.

It speaks for itself.

In the year 2009, citizens don't want to take a
seat in the back of the bus while imbeciles like
Joy Cooper do the driving -off the cliff.

(The woman who at the formal presentation
and Commission vote on the city's over-due,
over-budget Transportation Master Plan,
at the HB Cultural Center, was too dumb
to ever ask the city's consultants whether
or not the city's own mini-bus drivers were
ever interviewed for input; they weren't.

Right, ignore your own employees who are
best-positioned to speak to traffic issues
and patterns and take the word of consultants
who do their research based on city traffic
patterns during the slowest part
of the year.
That's her enlightened management style
which has so coarsened public sentiment
and common sense here.


In case you forgot, that's the meeting that
Comm. Anthony A. Sanders
never attended
and subsequently never gave an explanation
for missing.
Yeah, because traffic isn't really much
of
a concern here.

About what you'd expect from a city like
Hallandale Beach that is so poorly-run and
with so little apparent awareness of how
very poorly it is regarded in South Florida,
that when it came time to host BCTA chief
Chris Walton for one of his frequent visits
throughout the county, that he was given
the HB Cultural center at the SAME TIME
as a HB City Commission meeting.
Really.
SNAFU!)


As if, somehow, Broward taxpayers would suddenly
forget everything they knew and had experienced in
the recent past and would suddenly accept govt.
estimates on construction costs -and Broward's
in particular as reliable
- and use that factoid
as a deciding factor in deciding an issue.

See also:

When that move of Lieberman's later seemed
to be a real impediment when the Broward
County Commission wanted to do something
to help fast-track a new county Courthouse,
in part because that would have to appear
on the ballot if a bond issue, along with that
estimate she insisted upon, Lieberman
appointed herself to the county's Courthouse
Taskforce, and was promptly made Chair,
giving her two chances to bite the apple
and affect this important decision, not just one.
Right, because she has no obvious conflicts.

You read about that decision where in
the South Florida media, exactly?
Right, it never came up.

As to the Ethics Commission. simply do what
Charlotte Greenbarg
suggested, as quoted
by Scott Wyman in his very good Sun-Sentinel
article of September 10th:
Broward ethics
panel plans sweeping reforms

"My ideal would be something very simple -- don't ask and don't take,"
said Charlotte Greenbarg, president of the Broward Coalition, a
n
umbrella group representing area homeowner and condo associations.
"They shouldn't ask for anything and they shouldn't take anything.


Who could argue with that?
So easy that even a Broward County
commissioner could remember it,

Lieberman
did a poor job as Chair in the view
of many who were closely following the actions
of Taskforce members, many of whom seemed
to have conflicts of interest of the sort that in a
more enlightened community with higher standards,
would cause them to have never passed muster
in the first place.

Not that they were bad people, simply that their
own experience and personal and professional
relationships with certain people was of a sort
that would tend to cause them to not be objective
as to the basic question of whether a new
Courthouse was, in fact, needed.

As opposed to having the existing one modified
and expanded, using some artistic creativity and
making it far safer, more energy-efficient,
technology-based and taxpayer/citizen-friendly,
NOT lawyer/judge-friendly
.

Some outside-the-box thinking was required,
but as usual, that kind of thinking was shown
the door.

Quick, name the Taskforce member who was
appointed specifically to represent the average
county taxpayer?
There wasn't one.

As you know from my previous posts,

Lieberman
did NOT properly update Taskforce
meeting information on the county website, and
under her leadership, they actually had the gall
to place agendas, past Minutes and other
pertinent material on the county website hours
AFTER their last public meeting, not prior
to that meeting
.


So, where did you read about that in the
South Florida media, exactly?
Right, it never came up.


And all of a sudden, word started emerging in
the usual places that the County Commission
was going to try to finesse this project instead,
so that it won't ever have to appear on the ballot
for taxpayers to give their informed consent,
because it's abundantly clear that Broward
taxpayers are NOT in favor of building a new
Broward Courthouse.
Period.

Ilene Lieberman
, churlish chronic,
self-interested
obstructionist to common sense.

---------
This is part of an email that was forwarded to me.
I've deleted some blank space to make it more
compact.and easier to read:

From: Cepero, Monica
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:13 PM
To: 'Alfreda Coward'; 'Carl Shechter'; 'Comm. Carl Shechter'; 'Felicia M. Brunson'; 'Howard Bakalar'; Jardine, Arlene; 'Julie Lakosky'; 'Kenneth Fink'; Leu, Leah; Cepero, Monica; 'Neal de Jesus'; Robert Wolfe; 'Robin Rorapaugh'; Russo, Jean; Seff, Bradley; Teitler, Robert; 'Washington Collado'; 'William Scherer'
Subject: Broward County Ethics Commission verbatim minutes

Attached are the verbatim minutes from the last Ethics Commission meeting. The summary minutes will be forthcoming next week.

Have a nice weekend,

Monica

Monica M. Cepero

Assistant to the County Administrator

115 South Andrews Avenue, Room 409

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Well, it's now 4:15 p.m. on Wednesday Nov. 25th.
the day before Thanksgiving, with county
employees off on Friday.
I just went to the
Broward County Ethics Commission
homepage at:
http://www.broward.org/ethicscommission/welcome.htm

As you can see for yourself, the Minutes for the
November 12th Ethics meeting are not there now,
two weeks later.

Trust me, based on what the verbatim Minutes
say, when you actually see the Minutes in print,
you will be very, very angry.

The next meeting of the Broward County
Ethics
Commission is Monday December 9th, from
9-11:30 a.m.

---------
Broward Beat

Sources: County Commissioners Trying To Block Ethics Rules
By Buddy Nevins

Some Broward County commissioners are apoplectic over what’s happening at the Ethics
Commission.

And it is causing them to act, well, downright unethical.

Some County Commissioners are accused by sources of applying pressure to reign in the ethics group. The group was created by voters to draft new ethics rules for the county.

“We’re having trouble and it’s coming from the Fourth Floor,” said one ethics commission member.

The Fourth Floor of the Government Center is where commissioners are cloistered behind two sets of receptionists.

See the rest of the story at:
http://www.browardbeat.com/sources-county-commissioners-trying-to-block-ethics-rules/

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Update on latest Broward County Courthouse Taskforce meeting, which again can only see one answer: MORE MONEY!


My comments follow the article.
-------

Miami Herald

New courthouse talks move forward



For years, Broward County leaders have bemoaned the state of their main courthouse, an old, oddly organized building prone to leaks.
Now a task force says the best solution is constructing a new, 17-story tower with a $328 million price tag. County commissioners are scheduled to discuss the proposal Tuesday.
This will be the county's second attempt in recent years at getting a new courthouse. In 2006, Broward leaders proposed a more expensive plan that required a voter-approved, $450 million bond issue. Voters rejected that idea.
As for the new proposal, no floor-by-floor plans for the building exist.
County consultants say they can't craft detailed plans without the commission's OK.
But they have identified a general layout, which elements they cut from the 2006 plan, and a long list of problems that need fixing.
At issue, they say, is an outdated design with a heavy dose of wear and tear in the building, which at its core is about 55 years old.
''It has outlived its life. It has outlived its culture,'' said Mario Cartaya of Cartaya and Associates Architects, one of several consultants hired by the county to examine the courthouse. ``And so, because of that, you've got severe issues.''
Cartaya highlighted these problems:
A layout that mixes judges, employees, visitors and prisoners in the same space, even sometimes putting judges and inmates in the same elevator at the same time.
''This is the one that is a ticking time bomb,'' Cartaya said.
Water, sewer and electrical systems from the 1950s that are failing or close to it.
Cartaya also predicted needing a new air conditioning system in the next year or two.
Weakened connections between the windows and the walls that could fail in another hurricane, especially a Category 2 or higher.
Some fixes require tearing down entire walls, which would mean renting separate space so the courthouse could continue while undergoing renovations. Other problems, like the shared elevators, can't be changed, leading to the question:
Which is cheaper, building a new courthouse or fixing the old?
Consultants say a new one probably would be cheaper.
That assessment probably is correct, said University of Florida professor Michael Cook, who teaches the cost of construction and estimating at the M.E. Rinker Sr. School of Building Construction.
Cook hasn't analyzed the Broward courthouse, but said its situation sounds similar to other public buildings he has studied. Since they are built to last a long time, when they finally break down, sometimes the pipes and mechanics inside the building aren't made any more, making the fixes -- and bringing the building up to code -- expensive.
''It's like an automobile. How much are you going to invest in an auto when you can get something brand new that will last a lot longer for a little more, maybe even less?'' Cook said.
There are exceptions to that idea, such as the 81-year-old Miami-Dade County Courthouse. That building benefits from several factors, said architect Don Dwore, who is in charge of the Broward project for another consultant, AECOM Design.
It's made of stronger materials -- masonry -- as opposed to Broward's metal and glass, which was prevalent in the 1950s. Also, Miami-Dade took good care of the building, which earned designation on the National Register of Historic Places, further requiring good maintenance, Dwore said.
''It's on the historic register. That elevates any building to another status,'' Dwore said.
Last year, two plumbing leaks forced the Broward courthouse to close, including a burst pipe in December that soaked court files, knocked out phone service and delayed trials. Earlier this year, a handful of courthouse employees sued the county, alleging the building made them sick.
Those breakdowns lead to a renewed push for a replacement building, resulting in the latest plan: the 18-story building to be built where the judicial garage sits.
The bottom floor would be a garage.
Courtrooms, clerk offices and state attorney offices also would be housed in the building, the task force report says.
The courthouse's newer wings -- east and north -- were built about 15 years ago and would remain as is. They include criminal courtrooms and most of the public defender's office.
When the new tower is done, the old west and central area would be torn down and landscaped, according to the report. Those areas include what is now the main lobby, civil and family court, clerk of the court, courtroom administration and most of the state attorney's office.
But to bring down costs and avoid another bond issue proposal, some features included in the 2006 plan were cut, including:
Plans to buy land near the courthouse to add 3,000 parking spaces. The new proposal adds about 600 spots. The county will try to add more parking around the courthouse, but as a separate project, said Pete Corwin, assistant to the county administrator;
Moving the main public defender's office into the new building. It will stay in the east wing;
A handful of extra courtrooms;
Upgrades to satellite courthouses;
Larger work spaces. In total, the new courthouse will be more than 200,000 square feet smaller than the 2006 courthouse proposal.
But the new plan will have a bit of room for growth. The tower would include an empty floor for adding offices or courtrooms as needed, Dwore said.
Chances are good that floor would be put to use pretty quickly, Dwore said, adding, ``I've never seen a courthouse shrink.''
Reader comments at: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/broward/v-fullstory/story/1029948.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=5840663&commentSort=TimeStampAscending&pageNum=1#Comments_Container
----------------------------------
The May 5th Courthouse Task Force Update on Tuesday will begin in Room 430 at 12:00 PM or immediately following the morning County Commission meeting.

NOTE: This is NOT the same room as the County Commission Chambers, Room 422, so leave early if you want to get a good seat.

The County's one-sided Task Force interim report is at: http://www.broward.org/courthousetaskforce/pdf/interim_report.pdf

It concludes thusly: "The Task Force plans to meet again in June to discuss several open issues related to future phases. These include the long term phasing plan; and an updated estimate of shell space; potential for Stimulus funds; use of a County owned building on Federal Highway; and the potential sale of the land on the New River."


I definitely plan on attending this and really letting the criticism flow.

Maybe, just maybe, I'll even get some answers to the reasonable questions I've posed here in the past, including the curious composition of the group, ALL of whom have a self-evident tie-in to Broward's legal community or to County or local government.
Talk about a complete lack of diversity!

Yet there's not a single architect, urban planner, engineer or high-technology expert on the Task Force?
And the chair of the Task Force is one of the County Commissioners, Ilene Lieberman?
Now that's Broward County in a nut-shell!


Is it really that hard to get honest, open-minded people in this county to be on a panel?
No, but that presupposes that was, in fact, what they wanted; it wasn't.
They wanted a booster club, not a fact-finding group.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Another Disaster for Broward's Ilene Lieberman. But's who's counting? (Me and many others!)

At 5 p.m. on the day of what I was assured by the Broward County Govt. Center would the LAST public meeting of the Broward County Courthouse Taskforce, the webpage the county specifically constructed for purposes of communicating with the public STILL didn't have today's meeting information on it.
The meeting's already over.

Another great moral victory(!) for Broward County Comm. Ilene Lieberman, who, last year, wanted to prevent the mass transit-riding public from actually populating a proposed MTA, since it would/could actually result in regular citizens using that group to occasionally holding her, the Commission and the Broward MPO to account for the disastrous transportation planning in this county that I've cited so many times.

The longstanding disconnect between connecting Tri-Rail and Fort Lauderdale Stadium for events there being the most obvious to anyone who's actually paying attention.
Of course, now, the Orioles have flown the coop, probably for good.
Paging Mayor Jack Seiler!

See my August 25th post of last year on how Lieberman's fingerprints were all over that particular effort, which South Florida's media completely ignored.

http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/re-vote-on-broward-county-auditors.html
Naturally, right in the middle of things, because it's the way things are done in Broward County, was someone from the Broward League of Cities, one of the most ardent opponents in the state of grass-root citizen participation in any kind of oversight capacity.
In this case, the elected head of the organization for this year, Margaret Bates.

But they are just the two most visible targets of sheer incompetency and mis-management
on this effort.
Below is the rest of the list of today's culpable parties.
See anyone you know?

The next time you run into one of these characters, why don't you look them straight in the face and ask point blank: "Why should YOUR opinion count for anything if you're paying SO little attention to this matter, that you didn't even notice that your own group's webpage hasn't been changed in five weeks, and made accurate for the public?"

http://www.broward.org/courthousetaskforce/members.htm
Broward County Courthouse Task Force Members
The Courthouse Task Force Members are:
• Broward County Commissioner Ilene Lieberman, Chair

• Margaret Bates - President, Broward League of Cities
• Scott Chitoff - Brinkley, Morgan, Solomon, Tatum, Stanley and Lunny
• Greg Durden - Greg Durden, P.A.
• Howard Finkelstein - Broward County Public Defender
• Howard Forman - Clerk of Courts
• Jose Izquierdo - Izquierdo and Marin
• Chuck Morton - Chief Assistant State Attorney
• Linda O'Neil - Judicial Assistant to Judge Robert Lee
• Carol Lee Ortman- Broward County Court Administrator
• Eugene Pettis - Haliczer Pettis and Schwamm
• Scott Rothstein - Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler
• Chief Judge Vic Tobin - 17th Judicial Circuit
• Circuit Court Judge Peter Weinstein