FOLLOW me on my popular Twitter feed. Just click this photo! @hbbtruth - David - Common sense on #Politics #PublicPolicy #Sports #PopCulture in USA, Great Britain, Sweden and France, via my life in #Texas #Memphis #Miami #IU #Chicago #DC #FL 🛫🌍📺📽️🏈. Photo is of Elvis and Joan Blackman in 'Blue Hawaii'

Beautiful Stockholm at night, looking west towards Gamla Stan

Thursday, May 31, 2012

In light of more news stories re bad Hallandale Beach CRA loans, Csaba Kulin and I thwart yet another of City Hall sycophant Andrew Markoff's desperate attempts at revisionist history of City Hall's trail of crony capitalism under Mayor Joy Cooper and her Rubber Stamp Crew; @MayorCooper, @SandersHB, @AlexLewy

In light of more news stories re bad Hallandale Beach CRA loans, Csaba Kulin and I thwart yet another of City Hall sycophant Andrew Markoff's desperate attempts at revisionist history of City Hall's trail of crony capitalism under Mayor Joy Cooper and her Rubber Stamp Crew. The facts could hardly be clearer.
Last Friday, when I having so many problems connecting to the AT&T server, and therefore couldn't post a blog post about it, Broward Bulldog reporter William Gjebre wrote something quite interesting that the Miami Herald posted online and in print before it could appear in the Bulldog's own website.

That something consisted of yet more incontrovertible facts about the very curious and questionable loans made by the Hallandale Beach City Commission the past ten years when acting as members of the HB CRA Board.


Gjebre, who has written so many pieces over the past  year about the highly questionable and perhaps even unethical or illegal doings that have happened so often at Hallandale Beach City Hall while Mayor Joy Cooper, former City Manager Mike Good and soon-to-be-departing CM Mark A. Antonio have been on the scene, with their fingerprints on seemingly everything that has cost this city's taxpayers either their money or their pride or both, wrote about a particularly egregiously ill-considered 2009 CRA loan that I wrote and talked a lot about at the time it was being considered.


A loan that nobody in the city other than the principals involved, the city manager's staff and 4 of the 5 city commissioners thought was a good idea.

Seeing as how I was one of the people there opposing the deal, and recorded much of what happened, I'd say that I'm in a pretty good position to comment on what was what.

Miami Herald
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/20/2816286/hallandale-beach-unable-to-recover.html
Hallandale Beach unable to recover $75,000 loan     
After a local businessman died, the firm he helped start fell apart and defaulted on a city loan.
By William Gjebre, The Miami Herald
A firm that obtained a $75,000 business development loan from Hallandale Beach without signing a repayment agreement or providing collateral has defaulted, leaving the city unable to recover nearly all of the taxpayer-supplied money.
The loan default by Digital Outernet Inc., headed by a Californian with past ties to the pornography industry and a local businessman who has since died, is the latest mix-up to surface in the operations of the city’s Community Redevelopment Agency.
News of the soured loan comes as the Broward Inspector General’s Office opened an investigation this month into the city’s management practices, including those at the CRA, which is led by the five city commissioners.
“I was against it from Day One; we are not in business to lose money,” said City Commissioner Keith London, who cast the lone vote opposing the loan three years ago. “It was never a sustainable, viable initiative.”
Digital Outernet was incorporated in November 2008. Four months later, it got the loan to buy equipment and materials. The plan it sold the city on: to set up television screens in local businesses and condominiums and sell advertising while also airing city and other information, such as job ads.
The corporate loan was made during a time when the city was making numerous loans to local businesses, some controversial:
• In 2009, the city administration approved a $50,000 loan for a weekly newspaper, The Sun Times, forgiving half the loan ($25,000), even though two top executives earned $200,000 annually two years before the loan. Mayor Joy Cooper is a featured columnist.
• The same year, the city erroneously forgave an extra $7,500 on a property improvement loan that Commissioner Anthony Sanders obtained before he was a commissioner. As a result, Sanders’ nonprofit Higher Vision Ministries did not repay $15,000 on a $46,000 loan for property improvements at 501 NW First Ave. The city then bought the property for $235,000, even though the church paid only $45,000 for it in 2001.
Digital Outernet’s chief officials were local businessman John Hardwick and Californian Steve Fecske, according to state corporate and city files.
When the loan was approved, the Sun Sentinel reported at the time, Fecske told Hallandale Beach commissioners he had been involved with a company that provided technology services to porn-connected websites, one of which featured star Jenna Jameson. He assured commissioners his pornography work was in the past.
Fecske is listed on LinkedIn, the professional networking website, where he is described as an “independent information technology and services professional.” He is currently associated with McKenzie & Co., Forensic CPAs in Los Angeles. He was president of Digital Outernet Inc. from 2007-10.
Fecske could not be reached for comment.
On the current Florida Department of State Division of Corporations website, Digital Outernet is listed as inactive.
While approved for a $125,000 loan, Digital Outernet received only $75,000. It had to meet certain city-imposed conditions to get the rest, but apparently did not do so.
However, one loan requirement was waived by the city: that the firm had to own its place of business. Digital Outernet leased.
The loan also provided for 15 percent ($11,250) forgiveness, with the balance to be repaid at 4 percent interest rate over 10 years.
City records show it wasn’t long after funds were distributed that problems at Digital Outernet became apparent.
In June 2010, the city sent a letter to Hardwick and Fecske denying their request for the additional $50,000. The letter pointed out the firm had missed its first two quarterly loan payments of $2,284 each, failed to sign a loan promissory note, and did not provide required financial reports and details on employee hires.
A month later, the city sent a similar letter.
CRA director Alvin Jackson said he met with Hardwick shortly after he became director of the CRA in January 2011, reminding him about the loan repayments and the documents and reports that needed to be filed with the city.
But state corporate records show that by then, the company had ceased to exist as a legal entity.
Available city records do not explain what happened to Digital Outernet and the city’s $75,000. A recent report by an auditing firm criticized the CRA for failing to properly track loans and property acquisitions.
Jackson said the company made only one installment payment of $2,284 in July 2010, adding that the firm appeared to go out of business with the death of Hardwick.
A member of the Hallandale Beach Chamber of Commerce, Hardwick, 41, suffered a stroke and died at Hollywood’s Memorial Regional Hospital on May 22, 2011. Prior to becoming involved with Digital Outernet, Hardwick ran a barbershop/salon at 708 Foster Rd. in the city, the same location listed for Digital Outernet.
Jackson said the Digital Outernet file was sent to the city attorney’s office for review and follow-up action. He said he was told that an investigator was sent to the Foster Road address to identify possible assets but none have been recovered, so far.
Jackson said he believed that Digital Outernet may have actually placed several television screens in local businesses, but he did not know for certain. The city file contained no information on the placement of the video screens.
The city “never got the balance” of the loan, Jackson added.
Broward Bulldog reviewed the city’s file. It makes no mention of Hardwick’s death and gives no indication that the city was trying to follow up by reaching Fecske in California.
The file also did not indicate what, if anything, the city attorney’s office did in the matter. There were no reports by the city attorney’s staff in the file.
Local real estate agent Joe Kessel is listed as an official of Digital Outernet in one document in the city’s file. He said in an interview that he was “not involved” with the company and had long ago asked that his name be removed as an associate. Kessel declined to further comment.
Mike Good was the city manager at the time of the loan. The file contains a letter he wrote endorsing the project. “The city supports the concept and advertising model offered by Digital Outernet, Inc., and seeks the support from our local business community as well,” Good wrote in his letter in December 2008.
Good, who was fired in June 2010, could not be reached for comment.
Broward Bulldog is a not-for-profit online-only newspaper created to provide local reporting in the public interest. www.browardbulldog.org 954-603-1351

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/20/v-print/2816286/hallandale-beach-unable-to-recover.html#storylink=cpy

-----
Later in the day, while up in Hollywood for something, I wrote the following email to a number of the usual well-informed citizens, civic activists and pols I know throughout the area, which also included the following links:


Another black eye – Hallandale loses $75,000 in taxpayer money in botched business loan

By William Gjebre, BrowardBulldog.org

APRIL 17, 2012 AT 5:59 AM


http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2010/04/hallandale_digital_outernet_joe_kessel_jenna_jameson.php


Once again, this time on the reader comments of the Miami Herald's website, Hallandale Beach's unofficial revisionist historian, Andrew Markoff, has jumped into the fray to spin his nonsense and has conveniently neglected to mention that all of the public criticisms of this particularly egregious CRA loan were given by plenty of people WEEKS BEFORE and MINUTES BEFORE it was approved 4-1 at the HB City Commission, with Comm. London the only one who questioned what was being proposed.

People in this community opposed it with facts and figures that Mayor Cooper, Bill Julian and Anthony A. Sanders thought were much less important than the fact that John Hardwick and Joe Kessel were involved. 

Nope, for them, voting for it no matter how illogical it was, because of their relationships with
the principles, trumped any amount of common sense or calls to do the right thing by
taxpayers, and actually do something with the money that reduced blight and crated real jobs.

Andrew Markoff, who loves nothing more than to gesticulate and point fingers at people in this
community who were and are consistently pro-reform, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability,
like Comm. London, Michael Butler and myself, to name but three, always has an excuse ready for every ridiculous and illogical thing Cooper, Julian and Sanders -and now Lewy- say or do, but he lived in the city at the the time this awful idea was proposed.
What did Markoff say when the facts were presented?

When it was brought-up over-and-over by opponents like Csaba Kulin and Comm. London that the applicants didn't even meet the city's own simple requirements, literally, the lowest possible threshold you could find in South Broward or North Dade -that they own property in the city and offer some reasonable amount of collateral- and this fact was confirmed by the city's own staff,
what did Markoff say and do?

What did Markoff say about the loan that was so impractical and self-serving that not a single bank in the area, even ones where they were known entities, would loan them any money? 
Markoff said nothing and did nothing.

But now, after Cooper and her Rubber Stamps Julian and Sanders have seen that money go into a black hole, by not showing due diligence, he's all live-and-let live despite that fact that we -collectivelywere the very ones who predicted that nothing good would come from such so many exceptions being approved by them for not just a bad idea, but a VERY bad idea.

Once again, Andrew Markoff on the wrong side of history and trying to throw stones at the very people who warned that this was a bad idea.

(His personal and absurd public criticisms of me no longer bother me quite the way they once did, considering how much I helped him a few years ago before he just turned on me like he has so many other people in this community, who have tried to give some insight into what makes this town the way it is. 
Still, at some point, it really behooves someone besides me to actually publicly point out for the record that Andrew Markoff has no tangible record of ever being someone who wants the best for this community as determined by the majority of the community making itself known in-person. 
Rather, Markoff plays the role of political commissar, defending the powers-that-be and their crushing bureaucracy, and calling people out because they don't share his tax-and-spend attitude.)

I might suggest that the next time any of you come across Markoff spouting off, you might want to ask him what his pen pal, former City Manager R.J. Intindola, late of Georgia, did to earn the EXTRA $97k a year he receives from HB taxpayers for the pension plan change he pushed a year before he retired.
When he fumbles for an answer, just tell him the truth -Intindola did nothing for it.
He just pushed it to get passed by the HB City Commission and personally profited from it.
An extra $2 Million-plus over thirty years.

Even in these days, no mater where you've lived around the country, $2 Million is still real money, esp. for someone who did nothing to deserve it.

If you forgot the details:
Csaba Kulin exposes the multi-million dollar bill to be borne by Hallandale Beach taxpayers for having a disconnected City Commission that was -and is- NOT interested in paying close attention to detail or in asking tough questions. That's how and why former City Managers Intindola and Good have made out like bank robbers

And approving a $75,000 CRA loan for a preposterous idea is STILL a lot to swallow since, in retrospect, it smells more than ever like a a political pay-off to longtime crony capitalism friends Kessel and Hardwick by their friends on the commission dais: Cooper, Julian, Ross and Sanders.


-----
My friend and fellow Hallandale Beach and Broward County civic activist Csaba Kulin later penned a response to what the Miami Herald's version of the article said and what Markoff was attempting to do:

Where to start about this predictable pro-City Hall comment of Andrew Markoff?


It seems to me that anyone in Hallandale Beach who was an appointee of Mayor Cooper, much less, to the city's Charter Review Board, like Markoff above, is not exactly an objective source of information. 
If he is going to persist in his never-ending Internet defense of HB City Hall and the mayor's unsatisfactory performance, he ought to be a lot more forthcoming about that central fact. It's telling that he never mentions it.

Contrary to what Markoff writes, there were many, many concerned HB residents at the time who spoke out against the self-evident weaknesses of this proposed CRA loan, both prior to and at the City Commission meeting three years ago. 

I know because I was one of the most vocal opponents of it, but in the end, facts didn't matter to the City Comm. as much as personalities and cronyism did, and Comm. Keith London was the only member of the Comm. who did any due diligence on behalf of the taxpayers. He voted no and once gain, time has proven him right and the others wrong.

While it's true that the former City Manager and CRA Director are gone, three out of the four “YES” votes for this senseless proposal will appear on November's ballot: Mayor Cooper, former Vice-Mayor Julian and Comm. Anthony Sanders. 

All three are asking HB voters to reject their own common sense and elect them to continue making one bad decision after another. 

More than is true in most cities in South Florida, these three individuals never seem to learn their lesson, and are never willing to publicly admit when they're wrong. 

If the residents of HB vote for the same people in November who consistently show such very poor judgment, we'll deserve the “black eye” these three have given us. 

Giving people a choice in November to actually vote for someone who's got a demonstrated record of civic involvement and who's FOR more accountability and increased transparency, not continuing the appalling status quo, is one of the reasons I'm running for HB City Commission.
-----
See my March 4, 2009 blog post about this preposterous 2009 CRA loan and what it really shows about Mayor Cooper and her Rubber Stamp Crew's love of crony capitalism, despite its ultimate costs to taxpayers as money down a rat hole. 
Hallandale Beach insiders to offer goodies/new propaganda TV channel to HB City Hall for $200k CRA loan Wed. morning

I've highlighted the item below in red
_______________________________________________



REGULAR AGENDA (Supporting Docs)
CITY COMMISSION, CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 04, 2009 10:00 AM

1.    CALL TO ORDER

2.    ROLL CALL

3.    PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4.    PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS

A.   Presentation of Certificates to the Student Citizens of the Month

B.   Presentation from Navarro Security Regarding Services Provided to the Golden Isles Safe Neighborhood District AR# 002/09

C.   Discussion of Public Works Construction Projects

5.    PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (to be heard at 10:15 A.M.)

6.    CONSENT AGENDA

A.   Approval of Minutes - Special Meeting August 1, 2008, Regular Meeting September 29, 2008, and Regular Meeting October 15, 2009(Supporting Docs)

7.    PUBLIC HEARINGS (to be heard at 10:30 A.M.)

A.   An Ordinance Of The City Of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Amending Chapter 32, Article V, of The City Of Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances, The "Zoning And Land Development Code"; Amending Section 32-790, "Time Limits And Revisions"; Providing For Conflicts, Providing For Severability; Providing For An Effective Date (Second Reading)(Staff: Director, Development Services)(See Backup) CAD#010/08 (Staff ReportSupporting Docs)

The Ordinance was passed on First Reading on February 18, 2009 with a vote of 5/0.

B.   An Ordinance Of The City Of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Amending Chapter 32, Article VIII, “Notice Requirements” of the City Of Hallandale Beach Code Of Ordinances, The “Zoning And Land Development Code”; Providing For Conflicts; Providing For Severability; Providing For An Effective Date (Second Reading) (Staff: Director, Development Services)(See Backup) CAD #032/07 (Staff Report,Supporting Docs)

The Ordinance was passed on First Reading on February 18, 2009 with a vote of 5/0.

8.    CITY BUSINESS

A.   Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-105, Award of Contract, Request Authorization to Award Bid #FY2008-2009-002, Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) NE 2nd Street Drainage Improvement Project, to the Lowest Responsive, Responsible Bidder, Tenex Enterprises, Inc., in the Total Amount of $639,325.50. (Staff: Director, Utilities & Engineering) (see backup)CAD#017/05 (Staff ReportSupporting Docs)

B.   Consideration of a funding request from Digital Outernet Inc.(DOI), through the CRA Economic Development/Business Incentive Program in the amount of $125,000, as outlined in the Staff Report. (Staff:  Director, Development Services)(See Backup)  CAD# 005/02 (Staff Report,Supporting Docs)

TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM # 3.A.                         

9.    COMMISSIONER REPORTS

10.  OTHER

11.  PLANNING AND SCHEDULING MEETING (to be heard during lunch recess in Room 257)

_____________________________________
http://www.hallandalebeachfl.gov/files/2009-03-04/staff%20reports/00004099.htm



CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE:          February 18, 2009

TO:               D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM:         Richard D. Cannone, Director of Development Services

SUBJECT:   Digital Outernet Inc., Business Incentive Loan Applicant CAD# 005/02                                                  

PURPOSE:

Consideration of funding for Digital Outernet Inc. (DOI), through the CRA Economic Development/Business Incentive Loan Program (ED/BILP). 

BACKGROUND:

In FY1999-2000, the City Commission/Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Board of Directors approved the establishment of an Economic Development Incentive Program. In establishing this program, the City Commission/CRA Board of Directors directed that each request for incentive assistance be placed on the agenda for consideration. Award of an incentive would be considered if a new business was seeking to locate within the City/CRA or if an existing business was expanding.

Under the Economic Development Business Incentive Loan Program (ED/BILP) loan terms 15% of the loan is forgiven and the remaining 85% is payable at 4% interest over 10 years. The applicant will be required to sign a promissory note and mortgage documents, to secure the remaining 85% of the loan.

DISCUSSION:

On November 24th, 2008 staff received a Business Incentive Loan Program application, Letter of Intent and Business Plan from Digital Outernet Inc., a new start up venture, registered with the State of Florida. Digital Outernet, a digital sales and advertising company, is seeking financial assistance in the amount of $200,000, through the CRA Business Incentive Program.

The company seeks to install approximately 125—32” or 42” LCD screens in approximately 40 - 60 businesses, condominiums and (8) City facilities throughout the City, which will provide advertising and/or marketing material, through what the company identifies as the “City Channel” network. The company intends to create an additional 9 -12 new jobs. Currently, the corporate structure outlines five (5) board executives, which are as follows:

1.    Steve Fecske                       President
2.    John Hardwick                     Executive Vice President
3.    Albert Cohen                        Chief Technical Officer
4.    Steve Tcherchain                Director of Technology          
5.    Joe Kessel                           Vice President of Sales

Staff along with the City Manager have met with representatives from Digital Outernet over the course of 8 months to discuss the business plan and items related to the operations of the business. During these meetings staff discussed the following items: security (i.e. equipment and data protection), overall benefits to the City, the company’s financial stability, organizational ownership and responsibilities.

  1. Benefits: The benefits offered to Hallandale Beach are primarily intangible, and include:
    1. The City will receive free services from the City Channel’s production for signage creation.
    2. The City will be able to schedule special programming, such as events, fund-raisers and employment opportunities and advertise at no cost to the City.   
    3. The City Channel offers the City an additional media outlet to distribute pertinent emergency information to residents.

  1. Revenues: No additional revenues will be provided to the City, other than funds received from the loan repayments.

CRA PLAN COMPLIANCE:

As part of the Updated Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Plan approved in 2004, the approval of funding for this venture would support the following goal, objectives and policies of the CRA Plan:

  1. Goal #2: The CRA shall implement projects and programs addressing targeted needs as well as area-wide concerns within the CRA.

  1. Objective #2: The CRA shall strive to improve the overall visual appearance of the CRA and strengthen economic development and viability.

  1. Objective #3: The CRA shall strive to encourage public relations and public awareness of activities within the CRA.

  1. Policies:

1c. The CRA Plan shall be reasonably flexible in accomdating private sector initiatives and future economic trends and opportunities

2e. The CRA, in coordination with the City of Hallandale Beach, may implement one or more subsidized or outright grant programs for the exterior and interior improvements to the commercial property, for expansion of existing business and for new business location within the CRA.

Considering the current economic downturn seen on local, state and national levels, CRAs are instrumental in stimulating and promoting economic development throughout their local area and neighboring communities. The City and the CRA approach economic development from various fronts such as:

1. Creation - New businesses develop in the community through entrepreneurial activities;

2. Attraction - New industries come into the community, either through the relocation of existing businesses or the establishment of new branch locations;

3. Retention - Companies, which are already established in the community, remain in the community and do not shut their doors or move elsewhere;

4. Expansion - Existing business establishments expand and increase their production or services offered. This leads to enlarging the physical location size, hiring new employees, and purchasing additional materials and supplies.

The DOI business model could afford local participating businesses the ability to create economic development activities, such as increased foot traffic and market exposure, which in turn could sustain our local business economy.

CONCLUSION:

Under the current Business Incentive Program requirements, applicants are required to own the real property, in which they want to expand and/or relocate. This applicant does not own the real property, in which they are looking to operate this business. The proposed location of operation is 708 Foster Road, which is owned by the Williams Family Trust, whereby DOI is leasing the building. Due to the applicant not meeting the ownership requirement, staff is requesting the City Commission/CRA Board of Directors consider waving this requirement and allow the City Manager to negotiate other means of securing funding and repayment.

Based upon staff’s analysis of the information outlined in the DOI Letter of Intent and Business Plan, staff is requesting City Commission/CRA Board of Directors consider of the request for funding subject to the following conditions:

  1. Digital Outernet scale back their funding request to $125,000.
  2. Change their network name from “City Channel” as residents and business owners may think it is a City service.
  3. Establish a small business bank account before funding is awarded.
  4. Apply and obtain the proper Business Tax License, prior to the release of funding.
  5. Release funds similar to the Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP).
  6. Waive real property requirement and allow the City Manager to negotiate other means of securing funding and repayment.
  7. Business to provide the Development Services/CRA Department with an audited Annual Performance Review every year during the funding term of 10 years.

For FY08/09 the City Commission/CRA Board of Directors approved the budget of $395,694, for the CRA Economic Development/Business Incentive program.



RECOMMENDATION:

The City Commission/CRA Board of Directors to approve the request from Digital Outernet Inc., for economic development incentives in the amount of $125,000, to assist in start-up expenditures, as presented. In addition, authorize the City Manager to negotiate the funding terms and disbursement of funds in the best interest of the City, subject to the following conditions:
  
  1. Digital Outernet scale back their funding request to $125,000.
  2. Change their network name from “City Channel” as residents and business owners may think it is a City service.
  3. Establish a small business bank account before funding is awarded.
  4. Apply and obtain the proper Business Tax License, prior to the release of funding.
  5. Release funds similar to the Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP).
  6. Waive real property requirement and allow the City Manager to negotiate other means of securing funding and repayment.
  7. Business to provide the Development Services/CRA Department with an audited Annual Performance Review every year during the funding term of 10 years.



Prepared By: ____________________________
                      Bobby Robinson, CRA Manager

Reviewed:

_________________________                                                        _____________
D. Mike Good, City Manager                                                                       Date


___ Approved                                  ___ Denied                              ___ Hold for Discussion

Comments:

______________________________

Contract and background info is at:

Page 9 is particularly absurd!

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Purple Reign Again? It's Orange vs. Purple in Sunday night's title game, as #1 Lady Gators lose to Syracuse in 2nd OT of NCAA D1 Women Lacrosse Semi-final #1, while #3 Northwestern again holds off Terps in repeat of last year's title match in nightcap; AT&T's U-Verse



Purple Reign Again? It's Orange vs. Purple in Sunday night's title game, as #1 Lady Gators lose to Syracuse in 2nd OT of NCAA D1 Women Lacrosse semifinal #1, while #3 Northwestern holds off #4 Terps and hope to capture their 7th NCAA Lacrosse Championship trophy
Owing to the terrible and completely unsatisfactory Internet service I've been getting thru AT&T's U-Verse the past three weeks, where I've seemingly only been able to access the AT&T server maybe 15% of the time that I want, and only then, sometimes for only a few minutes -only five minutes all day Thursday!- this is my first post since early Tuesday morning.


For someone like myself who's not just a blogger and a news junkie, but someone who frequently hears from lots of friends and people I know all over the world, some well-known or very knowledgeable about their particular subject area, whether now in Cannes for the film festival or in LA or London or wherever, NOT having reliable Internet access at home has made me increasingly exasperated.


So it was in that mood, one of almost desperate exasperation, that I tried my best to get online Friday night to watch the two NCAA D1 Women Lacrosse semi-finals up in Long Island at Stony Brook, since they were, amazingly, NOT being televised LIVE on-air, despite all the hundreds of cable stations that presently exist.


I tried a dozen or so times to get onto ESPN3.com or Watch ESPN -which is being heavily promoted on the Mother Ship these days- to watch the #1 third-year Florida Gators play Syracuse, one of only two teams they'd lost to all year, a 2OT defeat in the season-opener at Gainesville. Last weekend I watched the entire second half of what proved to be the Gator's 15-2 laugher of a Quarterfinal victory over a young Penn State state squad in Gainesville on SUN Sports, where the Gator's speed, quickness and depth just seemed to overwhelm a young and improving Nittany Lion team that's freshman and sophomore-centric, with exciting and talented players like freshman Tatum Coffey of Toms River, N.J. 
The Gators were so dominant that they went ahead by ten goals with just under 13 minutes left, so the clock kept running.
http://www.gopsusports.com/sports/w-lacros/recaps/051912aab.html
(I also had caught most of Penn State's match last month at Ohio State via The BigTenNetwork.)  


But on Friday night, when I wanted to see the exciting Gators -only the second women's
team in history to make the Final Four in their third year of existence -matching UNC about 14 years ago- each time I tried, the server was down.


By the time I finally got online, the exciting double-overtime first game had already concluded, and it was just before the start of the rematch of last year's title on the same field where Kelly Amonte Hiller's talented Northwestern squad beat her alma mater, Maryland, to get revenge on the Terps for beating them in 2010's title match in Towson -which was only about the best womens lacrosse match I ever saw.



WLAX Final Four: A Comeback For The Ages. May 25, 2012.
http://youtu.be/dAfXJFqFPZI



Did Syracuse tamper with the lacrosse stick? May 25, 2012.
http://youtu.be/3WqQLUmDh_k



McManus: Syracuse sticks with it, tops Florida
May 26 2:37 AM ET 
By Jane McManus, ESPNNewYork.com
http://espn.go.com/espnw/college-sports/7972599/2012-ncaa-women-lacrosse-tournament-syracuse-orange-top-florida-gators-2ot-thriller


Syracuse upsets No. 1 Florida
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/7973608/syracuse-upsets-no-1-florida-14-13-semis


Syracuse upsets No. 1 Florida 14-13 in semis
http://online.wsj.com/article/APbe6212bfe613422c90be1b423fa5f7d6.html



NU Athletics video: Lacrosse - NCAA Semifinal Highlights
http://youtu.be/ARTp5XobE04



NU Athletics video: Inside Wildcat Lacrosse Episode 10. Junior Midfielder Bea Conley fills viewers in on the week's preparations between last week's NCAA Quarterfinal victory over Duke and this week's Final Four tourney in Long Island. May 23, 2012.
http://youtu.be/goYHpn5huXM

Since I knew that the second game would be very close, my original plan had been to tape the last ten minutes of the Maryland-Northwestern match on my FLIP camera, and then email it to my sister and youngest niece in Maryland, so they could see how things ended, and even see if anyone they know from the Howard County/Baltimore area was involved in deciding the game.


Unfortunately, the breaks in the streaming were so egregious that while I went ahead and taped it, I chose not to send it because of the often 10-15 second delays.
Very, very frustrating.
I did decide, though, to save it on a DVD as proof of how bad the U-verse service has been.


Note to anybody who cares: when YouTube streamed concerts from Coachella, they were almost flawless, but for whatever reasons, when I've watched games via ESPN3's telecasts, not so much, even before the recent Internet connection problems.



Swedish House Mafia - Save The World, Live From Coachella, April 13, 2012
http://youtu.be/rYrFeo7efEY


When I watched Swedish House Mafia perform LIVE from Coachella last month around 2:15 a.m. or so my time here in Miami, there was maybe only one short flutter the whole time in their roughly 20-minute online performance that was shown. 


Back in March, Northwestern won on the road at Syracuse in overtime, 11-9.
http://youtu.be/1Ry7Mh6C5UE


Sunday night's final between Northwestern and Syracuse will be telecast LIVE at 8 p.m. on ESPNU, DirecTV Channel 208. 
See more at http://www.ncaa.com/sports/lacrosse-women/d1


-----
Did you know that even if you use the filters that AT&T provides for you for DSL 6.0 or U-Verse if you run both your house telephone phone and your Internet connection thru that phone line, i.e. "co-share," if some AT&T technician that you've never met doesn't type your original order in correctly, despite the fact that your phone number is right there and they could call if they had a question, you will be entered into the sytem as a "dry loop" -internet only- which will then adversely affect your speed and service and mean your speed isn't close to average, year-after-year?


Over five years later, I learned that lesson Friday afternoon when I finally reached a very friendly and knowledgeable AT&T rep who'd tell me the truth and think outside-the-box.
Yes, the sort of person that I have only been trying to find for years -as well as at Bank of America: someone who told me the truth about many things that I didn't know about.
I suspect they were only doing so since I mentioned that I was preparing to do the un-thinkable and actually go over to the Dark Side, and get my Internet service thru the company I loathe more than almost any other, COMCAST.


(Their terrible customer service record on the cable side in Arlington County, VA while I lived there for almost 15 years was legendary, one of the few D.C.-area legends that proved 100% accurate. Using the speed tests that YouTube has embedded with videos, COMCAST is nearly twice as fast in HB as what I currently have with AT&T.)


Did you know that it's AT&T's policy NOT to dispatch someone to check the lines in your neighborhood if you live in the Southeast United States, without first sending someone to a customer's home or business, even if they can tell on their computers at their HQ that the problem is affecting lots of their customers in a given geographical area?
It's true.


(Earlier this week an AT&T rep told me that 26% of their customers in my area were having the same problem I was having, but they still wouldn't just dispatch them to see what the problem was!)


For years I, like perhaps most of you reading this, have assumed that when I or someone else in the neighborhood called-up AT&T to report a problem with the server, help was being sent to check it out.
It wasn't.


Not unless they were willing to risk a $55 service charge if the problem was inside of their house, that is, after they were willing to hang around the house for 4-5 hours waiting for someone to show up.
And again, they already know that the problem ISN'T you.
So why the pretense?

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Getting in some early Tuesday morning quality babysitting with Estelle, the new Swedish Crown Princess, as SVT Play presented the Royal Christening -det kungliga dopet- LIVE from the Royal Chapel


SVT video: Archbishop Anders Wejryd christens Crown Princess Estelle as her grandfather, King Carl XVI Gustaf, mother, Crown Princess Victoria, father, Prince Daniel, and grandmother, Queen Silvia, plus Daniel's parents, beam with pride. Amazingly, Estelle was quiet until that moment. May 22, 2012.

Rather than catch-up on some TV shows I've taped the past week -The Killing, Mad Men, et al- I was diligent and did my Swedish homework early Monday night and watched SVT's information-packed one-hour show with host Ebba Von Sydow on the Royal Christening -det kungliga dopet- in Stockholm at the Royal Palace's Royal Chapel, Slottskrykan.


Which is why I'm so tired typing this, since the pre-game baby/fashion/royals watching analysis started promptly at 4:45 am Miami time, six hours behind Stockholm

And for those of you with a good memory, if the music you hear at the beginning of the info program sounds familiar to you, well, it should.
It's the same music that SVT used so well in their really beautiful and graphics-intensive on-air promos for the Royal Wedding -det kungliga bröllopetin June of 2010, which I actually saved  because of how magical they were.
Like something straight out of a classic Disney animated film -but modern.

And seriously, princess or no princess, that is one quiet and contented baby, as she was quiet until almost the very end of the ceremony, even with a singer, a harp and a flute only a couple of feet away from her.

I'll be posting some screen-grabs on the blog later in the day, as the post-christening show is still on at 8 a.m. Miami time, and I've heard about enough already about the fashions, the hats, and the etiquette, et al.

As usual, younger telegenic sister Princess Madeleine looked stunning + gorgeous + je ne sais crois!
I'll have the video of her, later, too.

Monday, May 21, 2012

First teaser trailer for new James Bond film, Skyfall, released today! "Some men are coming to kill us. We're going to kill them first." Skyfall opens in U.K. on Oct. 26th and in U.S. on Nov. 9th



The first teaser trailer for the new James Bond film, Skyfall, was released today to set the mood for the millions of eager 007 fans around the world. May 21, 2012. http://youtu.be/xJ4dAY3DW4c

"Some men are coming to kill us. We're going to kill them first."

Skyfall, the first 007 film to be only filmed in IMAX, opens in the U.K. on October 26th and in the U.S. on November 9th, the first Friday after the election.
Directed by Sam Mendes and starring Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Ralph Fiennes, Javier Bardem and Naomie Harris. And yes, once upon a time, the amazing Rachel Weisz dated Mendes for three years before breaking-up in 2002; she's now married to Craig since last year's surprise wedding.

Over 284,000 people have already seen this teaser within the first 12 hours it's been online...


New SKYFALL Production Videoblog. May 3, 2012. http://youtu.be/GK5ws85Rxd8

See the studio stage here, including a 360 view, at:
http://www.pinewoodgroup.com/our-studios/uk/pinewood-studios/stages/007-stage-pw

Visit the official website at http://www.007.com 

See more 007/Skyfall videos at their official YouTube Channel at http://www.youtube.com/user/jamesbond007

See who else Likes James Bond at http://www.facebook.com/JamesBond007 


Robbie Williams -  Millennium
http://youtu.be/BJ5uIkJDb6o

In a word, brilliant!!!

What's going on at the Miami Herald? More than a year after the last one fled, the Herald still lacks an Ombudsman -and shows no sign of getting one- to represent readers deep concerns about bias, misrepresentation and flackery on behalf of South Florida's powerful & privileged at the Herald. And that's just one of many unresolved problems there...


What's going on at the Miami Herald? More than a year after the last one fled, the Herald still lacks an Ombudsman -and shows no sign of getting one- to represent readers deep concerns about bias, misrepresentation and flackery on behalf of South Florida's powerful & privileged at the Herald. And that's just one of many unresolved problems there...


Those of you who come to this blog regularly will recall that back in December and January, I sent a very thorough letter to the top management of the Miami Herald -Publisher David Landsberg, Executive Editor Aminda Marques and Managing Editor Rick Hirsch among others- and some folks at parent company McClatchy Company regarding longstanding problems that I'd been aware of and had observed both in the newspaper and on their website. 


Problems that, from my perspective, at least, they seemed to be expending precious little time, energy and resources on resolving any time in the near-future, judging by the physical product they continue to churn out and what you continue to see on their crummy static website.


Clearly, that doesn't speak well of what's going on down at One Herald Plaza, but then that's not breaking news, either.


After sending those emails, I later re-purposed them and posted those comments here on December 21, 2011.


For another consistently lousy year of journalism at the Miami Herald, esp. covering Broward County, more lumps of coal in the Christmas stocking of One Herald Plaza -Part 1
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/for-another-consistently-lousy-year-of.html

Part 2 of More lumps of coal in the Christmas stocking of One Herald Plaza for another consistently lousy year of journalism at the Miami Herald, esp. covering Broward County

I heard via email from several other concerned media watchers in South Florida -some of them with names you'd instantly recognize- who also don't like the look of things at the Herald -or the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, either, for that matter.


People who, like me, feel that that given its enormous resources, even with a smaller staff, the Herald is not only short-changing the community in its geographical area, but has actually abdicated many of its basic reporting coverage responsibilities in critical ways, and yet can't even point to better and more nuanced reportorial coverage of the places it will actually deign to cover. 


While many people who wrote agreed with me just about 100%, others admitted that they hadn't personally noticed certain things I brought up to Herald management, but that once I mentioned it and they'd had some time to think about it, they found themselves largely agreeing with me that in a competitive marketplace, there was no logical reason for failing to resolve some of these longstanding problems that Herald readers have with the newspaper.


That was especially the case with the Herald's atrocious coverage of Broward County people, places and government, both local and county, where almost every night of the week, you can go to the Herald's Broward homepage, and yet consistently find that less than 40% of the listed stories have anything to do with Broward County.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/broward/#navlink=navbar


Who deliberately runs a newspaper like that? 


In any case, besides some small initial response that first week after they were sent, which came just before the holidays, six months later, nobody from the Herald's management has since followed-up with me or gone public in the newspaper about what and when the Herald is going to do something to prevent the slippery-slope from becoming "the new normal."


A good first step, though long overdue, would actually be hiring an Ombudsman, one who actually lives in South Florida and who not only has a weekly column, but is also equipped with a daily blog.


Someone to better represent readers with deep concerns about the Herald's reporting and editorial bias, misrepresentation of facts, consistent curious choice to leave some key facts out of certain stories, and the perennial concern about Herald flackery on behalf of South Florida's business interests and the personally powerful & privileged -like the newspaper's love affair with M-D Schools Supt. Alberto Carvalho, of whom seldom is heard a discouraging word.


But it's been more than a year now since Edward Schumacher-Matos left for NPR and the Council for Foreign Relations, and nothing is happening, even though that's actually something fairly easy to fix on that laundry list of unresolved problems there...
When are we going to see some tangible signs of positive change at the Herald?


And have you seen how weak their offerings are on their YouTube Channelhttp://www.youtube.com/user/MiamiHerald/ 


Without naming names, I know for a fact that there are twenty-something female bloggers in Scandinavia who are so popular that they produce more original video content and get more eyeballs seeing their original content on their YouTube Channel than the Herald gets for their's. (And they do it themselves, too.)


In fact, I know one such blogger in particular who has produced a number of videos within the past six months, most of which have been seen more times than ALL the Herald's videos for the past nine months combined. 


You'd think that by now, the folks locally at the Herald and in Sacramento for McClatchy, would have the good sense to be embarrassed at having all the resources they have, in a large market like this with so many interesting, bizarre and controversial things going on, yet posting such feeble content.
But, apparently, they're not.
------


Miami Herald
Looking back on 4 years of critiquing The Herald
By Edward Schumacher-Matos
May 1, 2011

Nearly four years ago, I wrote my first column as ombudsman. This is my last. I leave having learned a lot about you, the readers. I leave having failed you, too, in one promise.

I learned foremost that you care — about your community and your newspaper. You write a daily avalanche of e-mails to me and others at The Miami Herald or post comments online, often with passion, over issues in South Florida and the state.

When you don’t like how your point of view was treated in an article, you often threaten to cancel your subscription. Few of you actually do, at least for reasons of coverage. If anything, your reaction shows that you are reading the newspaper. And while most of my columns have been critical of something The Herald has done, you and I share this secret: For every article we disagree with, there are many, many more that we like. No other local news outlet keeps us as well informed.

I also learned your hottest buttons: Cuba, Israel, immigration, taxes, gay rights. And, of course, party politics. Your antennas are acute for any indication that The Herald might be tilting pro-Republican or Democrat.

But whatever your political inclination, the stories you like the most are investigations that ferret out local corruption. As The Herald has redefined itself through smaller staffs, shrinking paper size, and online expansion, you have overwhelmingly implored that it continue investing in the investigations that it does so well. After that, you most like local stories, though the Caribbean Basin and Middle East are local for you, too. You are sophisticated and cosmopolitan.

Few places in the country are so interesting. I am leaving to take up a new post as ombudsman of National Public Radio. I look forward to the political sensitivity of that role as NPR and the media nationally wrestle with how to finance responsible journalism and serve communities. But I will be sad to leave you.

So, how did I let you down? I announced in the beginning that in passing judgment on The Herald’s coverage — on whether it was one-sided, for example, or unfair or incomplete — I would tell you my position on the issue being covered in the original article. It was a revolutionary idea. Here is what I wrote in my first column:
“I’ll tell you upfront, and I’ll tell you my biases, for in the end what I write will necessarily be my own reasoned judgment. But I promise you it will be as fair as I can make it, never cynical, but sometimes irreverent. I strongly believe in good professional journalism, but I don’t think it’s Holy. You are welcome to agree, disagree or demand to kill the ump.”

That first column had to do with the coverage of the Gomez brothers, two young Colombians who were popular students but unauthorized immigrants detained for deportation. Their saga and the proposed Dream Act that might legalize them remains ongoing. Once a Colombian illegal immigrant myself, I wrote that I was sympathetic toward legalizing the unauthorized immigrants in the country.

Still, I criticized The Herald’s coverage for being slanted in favor of the boys. It largely overlooked legitimate questions held by many readers about the fairness of the Dream Act and legalizing the brothers.

But if I lived up to my promise in that first column, I found as the months went by that to state my position on the issues distracted from my critique of the coverage. I became the issue, instead of the reporting and editing by The Herald. As a mechanical matter, it also made the columns too long, especially if I wanted to explain the nuances of my views.

I didn’t make a conscious decision to stop the practice, but my promise somehow just slipped away.

I still wonder if there is a way to revive the idea, not just for ombudsmen, but for reporters.

We know that journalists are human and have opinions and political preferences. There also is no such thing as pure objectivity. We all see through the lens of our upbringing.

Most reporters stretch mightily to set aside their biases and follow basic journalistic rules. Editors further scrub stories for objectivity and fairness.

But we as a society are now in a cynical “post modern” age in which we have been taught to “deconstruct” articles in search of the writer’s supposed underlying intent. Trust in the news media is low. Would transparency about a reporter’s personal views help recover trust then? Is there a practical way to make it work? Or would it be a distraction from the news itself?

I don’t have the answers but would appreciate knowing your parting thoughts. As the news media fragments into many slivers of opinion, we risk fragmenting as a society and a nation. We need to have at least a common base of facts.

Thank you for the privilege of having been allowed into your homes and your considerations these past four years.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

My letter -and invitation- to Broward Inspector General John W. Scott and his team re the longstanding corruption and mismanagement at the City of Hallandale Beach


Below is a copy of the email that I sent on Friday to Broward County Inspector General John W. Scott and his team asking for an opportunity to tell what I know about how things are really done in this mis-managed and unethical town, and inviting him and his team of investigators -and anyone else- to come to the final Town Hall meeting at Hallandale Beach City Hall on Wednesday night at 6:30 p.m.

It should be a very interesting night as lots of perplexing questions that City Manager Antonio, Mayor Joy Cooper, Comm. Anthony A. Sanders and other public officials have done their best to avoid will be be asked again before a crowd of concerned citizens. 
 ------

May 18, 2012

John W. Scott
Office of the Inspector General
One North University Drive, Suite 111
Plantation, FL 33324

Dear Mr. Scott:

Please have your staff make arrangements to contact me within the next week so that arrangements can be made for me to speak with them and you in-person regarding the City of Hallandale Beach.

I'd like to discuss what I know and have personally witnessed with regard to multiple instances of broken state laws, corruption, mismanagement, self-evident violations of the State of Florida's Sunshine Laws, and still yet another matter.

I want to talk to you and your staff about the City of Hallandale Beach's outright copyright theft of some of my intellectual property, which has been going on since last year, a self-evident fact that can be seen by anyone going to the city's official website, where roughly one-third of all the images shown are, in fact, mine, and the city also use other images of mine on official city budget documents.

Someone taking something that belongs to you without your express consent and permission, taking it without paying you for its use, and appropriating it for their own commercial purposes, all of which the City of Hallandale Beach has done, is illegal and punishable by law.
Copyright theft by a municipal government is NOT the highest form of flattery.

Trust me, Mr. Scott, seeing is believing and there's a lot that I can not only tell you, but show you and your staff when you come to Hallandale Beach with open eyes and an open mind. 
I'm formally inviting you and your staff to attend the city's Town Hall meeting next Wednesday night at 6:30 p.m. at HB City Hall.

I can absolutely guarantee you and your staff that there, City Manager Mark A. Antonio will once again knowingly and illegally use my copyrighted photo images in his public presentation as he has done at every HB Town Hall meeting since the first one in February, when I told him publicly before other citizens at the Hallandale Beach Community Center that I would simply not accept the city knowingly and illegally using those copyrighted images of mine, which they neither have legal permission to use or have paid to use.

City Manager Mark A. Antonio and his staff's official response to me since then? 
Complete apathetic disdain.

City Manager Antonio, his staff and the rest of Hallandale Beach City Hall have done nothing to rectify the situation, and have instead, continued doing whatever they wanted to do, almost daring someone to stop them.

Mr. Scott, I not only have multiple photos and video of various HB Town Hall meetings around the city showing City Manager Antonio and his staff illegally using my images there -and at other city meetings after I specifically told to desist and do the right thing- I have, literally, hundreds of witnesses, including the HB City Commission itself, as well as the HB Police Chief, the HB Fire Chief and dozens of city Dept. heads, policeman and city employees.

I look forward to hearing from you and sharing what I know about what's been going on for years in this corrupt, unethical and mismanaged city.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

What I didn't include in that letter to Mr. Scott but could've is that for far too many years under the current mayor and the current and previous city manger, the concerned citizens of this community have had to watch -sometimes, almost helplessly- as the same handful of people at Hallandale Beach City Hall have consistently maligned their own citizens publicly; have actively thwarted citizen's efforts to use the Florida state constitution's Sunshine Laws to access PUBLIC information and actually hold the city and the people who run it publicly accountable for their illogical, illegal and anti-democratic policies and ordinances, and questionable if-not-outright craven crony capitalism.
Spending that seemed to almost intentionally operate in a stealthy fashion with no oversight, no accountability and little-to-no effort to recapture funds.

The result of the latter was that individuals and groups favored by HB City Hall were and are routinely rewarded with grants and loans despite NOT meeting the city's existing lax requirements, as requirements were and are routinely waived as long as there was at least one person in the group requesting funds who was a public supporter of Hallandale Beach City Hall, no matter how preposterous the request or its purpose.
If everyone who is "connected" receives an exception, then what is the purpose of requirements?

For years Hallandale Beach City Hall has actively tried to prevent Hallandale Beach citizens from getting access to public information they were legally entitled to -and have even been personally sued by the city in the process.

For years Hallandale Beach City Hall has purposefully held onto important public information about controversial land development proposals prior to votes by the City Commission, and have NOT made the information public as soon as was reasonable, but rather barely more than 24 hours before a publicly-scheduled vote, yet repeatedly -and rather pathetically- lying to HB citizens complaining about the problem by claiming they'd actually posted it online to the city's website the previous week.

These intentional lies and anti-democratic treatment of its own citizens continued despite the fact that the city's own online time stamps showed precisely when the documents were placed online.
That's the caliber of the people Mr. Scott will be dealing with.

This decision to place the interests of developers and their hired help above those of the public they're supposed to serve, allowed the people who run Hallandale Beach City Hall to keep the developer, attorneys, lobbyists and shills in the community apprised of all aspects of any requested changes, offers, counter-offers and negotiations, while keeping the public completely in the dark until the last possible moment.

The people who run HB City Hall have intentionally and physically prevented a Hallandale Beach taxpayer -mefrom accessing a publicly-noticed meeting in a room on the second-floor of two-story Hallandale Beach City Hall that I have been to dozens and dozens of times, by suddenly saying that the rules had changed and that I needed to wait for someone at the meeting to come downstairs and escort me up.
Why?
And why was there nothing written about any supposed new rule posted near the lobby desk or near the elevator?

Despite the fact that the meeting was public and the female city employee manning the lobby counter had a key that would've opened the elevator and allowed me to attend the meeting on time, they intentionally forced me to stay in the downstairs City Hall lobby for over 15 minutes while nobody ever came down; the rule didn't exist, they just didn't want citizens to attend.

This we know because when I finally was able to get upstairs, thanks to the efforts of Comm. Keith London, guess what?
Just as the one-and-only HB citizen who'd actually be present at the meeting was about ready to walk into the room full of city employees -me- the meeting was suddenly and mysteriously postponed, while the city employees scurried away,

Then-Assistant City Manager Mark A. Antonio raced into his office to hide and refused to explain to me or Comm. London why the public meeting was abruptly shut-down.
Though to be fair, Antonio did mange to yell in our direction before shutting the door, but it had nothing to do with why he allowed what happened to me to happen.

No, not exactly the way it appears in civics textbooks or the Florida Constitution.

At a publicly-noticed HB Planning & Zoning meeting a few years ago, one that was being televised LIVE throughout the city and City Hall from the HB Cultural Center, before a grand total of citizens at a meeting where about a dozen city officials, employees or representatives sat around a table in the middle of the room, a Hallandale Beach resident was threatened by the head of the Board with eviction from the meeting, and then threatened with arrest for lawfully filming the public proceedings from their seat, about 75 feet away.

Then, as if that wasn't enough, Board member Sheryl Natelson stated that she didn't want to have her comments recorded, and said that she would not speak until the camera was turned off.
As if she was the one who decided what was and was not public at a public meeting.

As more regular readers of the blog would know, that HB citizen attending a public meeting was me, and it was my camera, from 75 feet away, that was recording what was a public representative was saying at a public meeting.

Mr. Scott and his team would be smart to know before he arrives on Wednesday that that's the mentality of the powers-that-be in this city, and that's how they do things here.

Thru obfuscation, intimidation and stealthiness, and even a willingness to threaten to arrest you for doing what you are legally able to do under the Florida state Constitution. 

Wednesday night looks to be quite a night.