Showing posts with label Stephen Stock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Stock. Show all posts

Monday, June 22, 2009

Updated; Why do Carrie Meek Foundation Directors still get free pass from South Florida's news media? Miami-Dade County's deal with Wackenhut, Carrie Meek's wearing of two hats, Kendrick Meek's time with wackenhut; Hallandale Beach Mayor Joy Cooper's ego and chicanery won't ultimately succeed -except in making this city much-worse than it needs to be; Michael Butler's Public Records Request leads to him being sued by Cooper & City, so where's the coverage in the Miami Herald?

2013 Update: Unfortunately, Michael Butler's Change Hallandale website is no longer in operation.
-----
This is an excerpt from a longer email I sent early Friday morning to some public policy friends and acquaintances around Florida and up in D.C., many of whom share my own incredulity on this particular subject, and wonder how much longer the obsequious media will allow Carrie Meekour region's "Dear Leader," to get away with her antics.


Please read this news story from South Bendvia their CBS affiliate, WSBT-TV

Local Shelters Lose Food Aid Because Of Fees

http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/48557542.html


Frankly, I can't help but wonder if this is going on somewhere down here, given the truly haphazard track record of actually following the spirit and letter of the law among many South Florida non-profits, who don't (always) train their own front-line personnel properly, often with devastating or tragic effects.

Or even the higher-ups, who ought to know better!

Look at the Carrie Meek Foundation's Board of Directors hardly being grilled a whit publicly in the local news media about what they knew -and when- about the very curious things that took place there.

Notice anything unusual about the foundation's Directors web page above?

Correct, it lacks any information identifying who those very people are, with no photos, no
biographical info about them, nada.
It's a simple list of names, not unlike an elementary school honor roll.

Consider these two sentences from Charles Rabins's excellent article in the Miami Herald from November 16th, at bottom, seven months ago:

The audit accuses the Meek Foundation of using money from business-tax receipts intended for development to pay its former executive director.
The group's contract called for it to pay the director from a trust fund, the
audit said.

MMAP never addressed why trust fund money wasn't used, only saying it
was involved in a joint venture to build an apartment complex on Northeast Second Avenue that should be "ready for occupancy" soon.

Well, the foundation's executive director, Anthony Williams, was able to snag a Herald Letter to the Editor less than a week later, on November 22nd, and -shocker!-
Williams never addressed that very simple question.

Is the general indifference down here among the media to follow-up on this story because of sheer laziness, or because of who the individual directors are, and what those people represent in the greater South Florida community, such as it is, including Carrie Meek's current role as one of Miami-Dade County's Washington lobbyists, and mother of a local Congressman?

If you didn't already know, that move was made at the explicit direction of M-D Commissioner
Sally Heyman, as CBS4's Stephen Stock mentioned in his excellent I-Team stories on
the M-D Commissioners' discretionary funds, which is nothing but a taxpayer-funded political
patronage slush fund, with zero oversight.


More than just the usual reasons why certain people in the community are asked to join such
efforts, I can't help but wonder if it's actually their very ubiquity that explains why they were chosen in the first place.

Sad to say, but speaking for myself, I can't help but wonder if that element explains most of the lack of interest among South Florida media for following that story further along.
After all, some of these people can CLOSE lot of doors to reporters on other, perhaps, more important stories...

I'm no News Director... but it might be a good time to head out and see what's what, months after Miami-Dade County gave a no-bid deal to lease 121 acres of Opa-locka Executive Airport to a foundation like Meek's, with ZERO track record to speak of with large-scale development.

So far, the only constant for the foundation's website is the same photo of Meek that appears
on every single page, yet when you click the Economic Development link, naturally,
assuming that there'll be something there of substance about the situation at the airport,
there's only "Coming Soon."

Wow, the same exact thing it said 3-4 months ago. Que pasa?

By the looks of things, they haven't added anything to the website since December 11th,
2008, and that was here:

It also seems to me like it's high time to ask the foundation's well-known Directors, who are
faceless on the foundation's own website, if they have any earthly idea what's going on.

Personally, having grown-up here, I have my doubts.

For good examples of what's been going on with the Meeks, including the MMAP, take a look at what ever-vigilant Eye on Miami has written about them in the past:

Earlier this year I found myself in a professional situation where I was in the company of some very well-informed media folks that were down here in South Florida while I was working up in the Washington, D.C, area during the 1990's.

People who were frequently at County Hall downtown and over on Dinner Key and all the usual locales where we've grown accustomed to seeing on LIVE stand-up shots for the 6 and 11 p,m. local newscasts.

Well, among the more interesting things I learned that day were that one of the many knocks on Kendrick Meek before he first got elected to public office, was that he had a reputation for often being a 'no-show' while working for Wackenhut, who was unable to complain
about this for reasons that should be patently obvious by now.
I was told this was "common knowledge."

Not that this probably will surprise many of you, but for the record, I have never voted for any of the Meeks and never will.
In 2006, rather than simply ratify Kendrick MeekI voted for myself for Congress.

Last November, rather than ratify Meek-supporter Joy Cooper, I voted for my friend and fellow Hallandale Beach civic activist, Michael Butler for mayor of Hallandale Beach.

Michael is the moral force and number cruncher extraordinaire behind the popular website,

In my own modest way, I describe his site thusly on my blogroll:
"Change Hallandale -New fact-based website by Hallandale Beach resident Michael 
Butler that goes directly after the longtime cronyism and incompetency at Hallandale Beach City Hall with cold hard facts, figures, graphs, charts and videos. See 'em for yourself and you'll see what's really going on!"

For his hard work at trying to ferret-out useful and compelling information and make it publicly
available for local residents to analyze, he's being sued by HB Mayor Joy Cooper and 3/4ths of the HB City Commission, the very people I so often -and accurately- refer to on my blog as The Rubber Stamp Crew, for obvious reasons.

Michael's particular crime?
Making public records requests for information that is specifically allowed under Florida's
Sunshine Laws by legal precedent, but which is particularly embarrassing to Mayor Cooper.

In this state, the actual content defines what's public, not the mayor's own desires or opinion.
Especially when she uses the HB City Hall office address and phone number and signs
them, "Mayor Cooper."

Mayor Cooper has engaged in subterfuge and chicanery on the dais of the City Commission in order to hide her own appalling personal failure to exercise proper judgment, and NOT mix personal, political and official business when sending emails.

(In fact, Mayor Cooper railed against Michael Butler and myself at Wednesday night's City Commission meeting, and though she didn't mention us by name, it was crystal clear to everyone whom she was referring, a fact not lost on any of the many people in Hallandale Beach who've contacted me in the days since, to see if I'd heard about it -yet.
Well, I was there, sitting in the back of the room taking note of Cooper's faux umbrage and false modesty.

I will try my best in the near-future to get video of her remarks posted here, so you can see for
yourself what she's really like when she gets on a smug, self-serving rant like Wednesday night's.

Hubris?
Joy Cooper not only can't spell it, she doesn't even know the meaning of the word.

No doubt Joy Cooper's been warned many times over the years that she courted legal trouble if she persisted in her unethical behavior with emails, but if she's nothing else, Joy Cooper is very, very stubborn and very, very egotistical, so other people's words of advice just bounce off of her like rain off a duck's back.

Rather than openly admitting her past mistakes and taking her punishment for not abiding by the laws of this state, per her sworn oath of office, she's trying to turn the tables on someone who IS genuinely interested in getting the truth out.

That's the main reason why HB taxpayers are now being billed -bilked- for $185 an hour for an outside attorney in the person of Jamie Cole, who, it would seem, has to literally make a mockery of both the State of Florida's Sunshine Laws and court precedents in order to make their case.

Oh, and did I mention here yet that the Miami Heraldin its infinte wisdom, has NEVER once reported on this sad and queer little story of South Florida in the year 2009?
A South Florida city that's actually suing one of its own citizens -and charging its own taxpayers for
the dirty deed- at the behest of a dishonest and
power-hungry poltician?
Now I have.

For more information on the absurdity of this lawsuit, orchestrated by and for the personal benefit of Mayor Joy Cooper, go to Michael's website, Change Hallandale, and look for his May 22nd post titled, CITY SUES ME TO DENY TRANSPARENCY
under Blog/Updates at http://www.changehallandale.com/

Be sure to also see my April 21st post on it, re Hallandale Beach City Hall fights blogger
seeking mayor's e-mail list
The latter includes the entire account written by the Sun-Sentinel's Ihosvani Rodriguez.
Reader comments for that story are still at:


Miami Herald

SECURITY CONTRACT DEBATE: Carrie Meek seeks to remain a lobbyist in Miami-Dade security contract debate - Former U.S. Rep. Carrie Meek is asking Miami-Dade officials to let her continue lobbying for both the county and Wackenhut Corp. despite their dueling positions on a security contract

By Beth Reinhard
May 17, 2009
In the escalating showdown between Miami-Dade County and Wackenhut Corp., former congresswoman Carrie Meek is on both sides.

She lobbies for Miami-Dade, which is accusing Wackenhut of bilking the county out of $3.4 million. And she lobbies for Wackenhut, which is suing the county for $20 million in damages.

"It's kind of hard to represent two masters," said Robert Meyers, executive director of the Miami-Dade Commission on Ethics and Public Trust.

But Meek is asking county officials to disregard the conflict of interests and allow her to continue representing both Miami-Dade taxpayers and the security company. She has received $150,000 from the county since mid-2007. She declined to disclose her Wackenhut pay.

"I don't see any reason why I can't continue to represent Wackenhut, and I've always been a strong proponent of the county," said Meek, a civil-rights pioneer who represented Miami-Dade in Congress from 1992 to 2001.

Allegations that Wackenhut was doctoring timesheets and leaving county transit stations unguarded go back to a whistleblower's civil lawsuit filed in 2005. The county auditor found evidence of overbilling in 2006 and released a report in 2008. In early April, County Manager George Burgess said the Palm Beach Gardens-based company should be barred from doing business with Miami-Dade.

Meek didn't file her conflict-waiver request until April 27 -- a year after the audit became public. She said she didn't know the county requires its lobbyists to give notice immediately in case of an "actual or perceived" dispute with a private client.

"I can tell you that Wackenhut feels that they're being unfairly judged," said Meek, who added that she did not know the lawsuit was coming. "I can't tell you who is right or wrong."
LONG-STANDING TIES

Meek and her family have long-standing ties to the Palm Beach Gardens-based security company.

Her son, U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek of Miami, sold security contracts for the company from 1994 to 2002, and his Senate campaign has received the maximum $10,000 donation from Wackenhut's political action committee. Meek's wife, Leslie, registered with the county to lobby for Wackenhut in 2004, according to public records.

The former congresswoman began lobbying for Wackenhut in April 2007, the same month the county hired her to focus on transit issues. She asked the county if she could continue representing both clients after she was reminded last month about the county's policy regarding lobbying conflicts, said Joe Rasco, director of the county Office of Intergovernmental Affairs.

"I think it's time we asked and that they proferred," Rasco said. "I think it's a fair question and we'll be taking a look at it."

Miami-Dade's lobbying contract describes a conflict of interest as a position contrary to county policy or its financial interests. Representing a client at odds with the county without permission "shall result" in the lobbyist's contract being thrown out and/or the lobbyist being barred from working for the county for up to three years.

"It is incumbent on the consultant and its employees, partners and subcontractors to remain mindful of the county's policy and fiscal interests and positions vis-a-vis other clients," reads the agreement.

Meek didn't make the initial cut in 2006 when the county decided to scale back its Washington lobbying team from eight to three firms and put the contracts out for bid. The county had been spending nearly $1.2 million a year.
'SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE'

"Paying this much for this many people was simply unacceptable," County Commissioner Sally Heyman said in March 2006.

But two months earlier, Heyman directed staff to add Meek and former state Rep. Mike Abrams -- who came in fourth and fifth place -- to the lobbying team. "This was coming out of nowhere," Rasco told county investigators, who concluded Heyman did not violate the ethics code because the lobbying office reports to the commission.

The commission unanimously approved hiring Meek and Abrams on an "as-needed basis" and set their pay at a maximum of $75,000 a year. County officials said the money would come from reserves set aside for hiring outside experts in case of an emergency, such as a terrorist attack or major hurricane.

Two years later, Heyman now says the county should consider paring down to two lobbying firms. The county pays two full-time employees in Washington to lobby the federal government, in addition to the team of three law firms plus Meek and Abrams.

"Are we getting our money's worth?" Heyman asked. "Originally, I thought so. I don't know right now, to tell you the truth."

Miami Herald

AUDIT SCANDAL: Tug of war for troubled Metro Miami Action Plan - Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Alvarez and county commissioners are vying to control an organization created as an economic driver in the black community.

By Charles Rabin
November 16, 2008
After three terrible days of rioting in 1980, Miami civic and political leaders aimed to heal the city through a 21-member group that would lay the foundation for an inner-city rebirth.

But more than two decades later, despite successful programs helping scofflaw teens and first-time home buyers, the Metro Miami Action Plan remains wracked by management breakdowns and intermittent scandal.

And now, with a scathing 76-page audit outlining millions of dollars of questionable deals, the MMAP may be stripped of control in a power struggle between the county mayor and commissioners.

This much Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Alvarez and county commissioners agree upon: If the agency is to survive, fundamental change must come. The real battle involves the fine print of that change and who will oversee the group. The mayor wants it; commissioners don't want to give it up.

Armed with the audit, which reaffirms old problems and unveils new ones, County Manager George Burgess said the agency must become a county department under the administration's eye. "Action must be taken to stabilize the organization and to ensure its effectiveness in advocating for the needs of the black community," he wrote.

Commissioners, who appoint the agency's board members, responded by creating a nine-member task force of high-powered black community leaders. Its mission: to press recommendations that would lift the agency out of its hole.
AGENCY'S MISSION

"The agency got off to a wonderful start, but somewhere along the way it lost direction," admitted Commission Vice Chairwoman Barbara Jordan. "But under the mayor's watch, it takes away from the original intent. How can you have it as a county department? You're dancing to the tune of one leader."

The agency's origins date to the 1979 beating death of Arthur McDuffie, a one-time Marine killed while handcuffed after a chase by white police officers. When the police were acquitted a year later by an all-white jury, a three-day rampage ensued that cost 18 lives and $100 million in damage.

MMAP was formed in 1983 to rebuild a torn business community. Among its goals were economic development, housing and education. Though its employees work for the county, it reports to county commissioners.

About $1 million a year of MMAP's $5 million budget comes from the county's general fund, the remainder from fees and a surtax.
TROUBLED BOOKS

Since management issues surfaced last year, 15 of the 21 appointed members have left the Trust, leaving only six to run the quasi-county agency.

Late last year, Miami-Dade prosecutors entered MMAP's Flagler Street office and hauled away computer files. There's been little word on that investigation, but the new audit, released last week, raises questions about spending.

Entangled in the audit are several church leaders, the Carrie Meek Foundation -- named after the longtime former U.S. congresswoman -- and Miami City Commissioner Michelle Spence-Jones.

The audit accuses the Meek Foundation of using money from business-tax receipts intended for development to pay its former executive director. The group's contract called for it to pay the director from a trust fund, the audit said.

MMAP never addressed why trust fund money wasn't used, only saying it was involved in a joint venture to build an apartment complex on Northeast Second Avenue that should be "ready for occupancy" soon.

Some of the agency's housing initiatives also came under fire.

In 2006, MMAP allocated $2.85 million for a lottery system in which first-time home buyers were given 0 percent loans that would be forgiven after 20 years if payments were kept up and the homeowner didn't move.

The audit found that notices of the lottery were placed in newspapers so late that applicants only had two days to respond. Despite public notices of applications available at several locations, they were only available at one.

"The lottery provided significant subsidies to only a handful of individuals, in effect awarding them homes as gifts," wrote county auditor Cathy Jackson.

Action Plan Chairman John T. Jones said the county's ethics commission investigated the lottery -- and found no misuse of funds. He also noted that the application deadline was extended a month at the public's request.
FUNDS IN QUESTION

And, the audit delved into deals that had been reported in The Miami Herald.

For instance, it requested that Karym Ventures, a Liberty City company owned by Spence-Jones' family, return $75,000 of Local Business Tax Receipts that the audit said were improperly used.

Spence-Jones called the auditor's request for restitution "totally wrong." She wouldn't comment further.

The audit questioned the $25,000 awarded to Liberty City's Friends of MLK, money that was to develop promotional material, outreach and build a website. The company couldn't provide documents to prove how the money was spent, the audit found.

"This contract and its principals are currently involved in a criminal proceeding," responded Jones, the trust chairman, saying the group would seek a return of any improperly spent money.

Friends of MLK director the Rev. Gaston Smith was arrested earlier this year on theft charges, accused of misspending the $25,000 county grant and passing along $4,000 to Karym Ventures.

Miami-Dade Police Director Robert Parker said Smith used the money for "his own personal gain." More than $10,000 was taken out in ATM withdrawals over three months, including $500 at a martini bar at the MGM Grand hotel in Las Vegas.

Smith's attorney, Michael Tein, said his client used the money to promote the organization, for travel to religious conferences and to pay an employee. Smith awaits trial.
UP FOR DISCUSSION

Commissioner Audrey Edmonson, who created the new task force, admits MMAP needs major reform and wants it placed under "management watch," akin to County Hall probation.

Her push to add oversight but retain control will be discussed in a Thursday meeting likely to spur debate. Ultimately, whether the agency's oversight is transferred to the mayor may well be decided by commissioners who still control its purse strings.

Either way, Edmonson said the agency's core mission must remain.

"The problem is there was a lot of conflict going on in the board," Edmonson said. The name "gets a sour feeling now among some people. But what it stands for is really needed in our community."

Miami Herald staff writer Michael Vasquez contributed to this report.

Monday, February 2, 2009

Urgent Hollywood Beach Erosion Update from Mayor Peter Bober; transit/Ft. Lauderdale Stadium connection blues

Below is an email I received today from Hollywood Mayor Peter Bober, whose election I supported last year, about a subject I support 100% because of its common sense and common benefit: larger beaches in SE Broward and NE Miami-Dade Counties.

The mayor's thoughtful letter is a rather eye-opening example of the reality of South Florida's regional inter-governmental cooperation, as opposed to the theory version so often preached at public meetings by local
MPOs and the South Florida Regional Planning Council, where, supposedly, everyone checks their parochial interests at the door.
(Speaking of parochial, I had planned on going to the latter group's meeting this morning on the controversial Davie Commons project, but decided to skip it.)

Below the information I received from Mayor Bober I've attached two items of special note.

The first item is an informative article on beach erosion written by Cynthia Barnett for Florida Trend
magazine that ran October 1st, 2008, and which I urge you to read.

The second item is video of an excellent in-depth news report from last February 15th that CBS-4's ace investigative reporter Stephen Stock and his I-Team did on the cost to taxpayers of beach renourishment, and the different approaches taken to this issue by governments in Florida and in North Carolina.
Sort of like the difference between a beach and a shore.

Tomorrow, February 3rd, will be a Broward County Commission meeting, starting at 10 a.m., and you can speak to this particular subject then if you choose -and are patient.
They're scheduled to also discuss Broward County's contribution to SFRTA (Tri-Rail) for Commuter Rail and
 Feeder Bus service in Broward County, and the establishment of an interlocal agreement between the county and SFRTA.

I plan on speaking to the Commission tomorrow about this subject, as less than two weeks before spring training starts up for the Orioles at Fort Lauderdale Stadium, the same absurd and infuriating longstanding situation continues there, wherein riders like me getting off at the Cypress Creek Tri-Rail station closest to the stadium, 1.4 miles away, find no transit connection of any kind to the stadium: no bus, no shuttle, no trolley, no nothing.

I can make do as I have in the past for Oriole spring training games, since the walk is just about a half-hour,
but not everyone in South Florida who want to go to a ballgame or any other event held held there, like the Broward County Fair, is physically able or interested in doing that.
For families with kids, Seniors, the Handicapped, et al, it's NOT a very realistic option,  esp. on warm days
or ones that look iffy for rain later in the day, since you can't bring umbrellas into the stadium.

It's an east to understand issue I first raised publicly at the Broward County Transit Forum in the Fall of 2007,
and one that I'll be doing an encore of for other attendees of at the upcoming regional Transit Summit on
February 21st at the Broward County Convention Center.


To me, after five years of being back down here from D.C., and being both an ardent Orioles fan and transit enthusiast, it's the perfect case study on South Florida's dysfunctional transportation and government system:
NOT being able to connect people from one taxpayer-funded site, the Cypress Creek Tri-Rail station, to the taxpayer-funded stadium that taxpayers actually WANT to go to, owned by the City of Fort Lauderdale

It's this inability to connect dots, especially dots that are close to one another, that led me to vote against
the proposed penny transit sales tax increase a few years ago, even though in other places,  my interests being what they are, I'd have happily voted for it and supported it publicly.
But not here.

As I stated pretty clearly to folks I spoke to back at that 2007 County Transit Forum, "As a matter of fact,
I don't HAVE to give the County the benefit of the doubt," when year-after-year, they've shown an
infuriating inability to work with SFRTA and the City of Fort Lauderdale to come to a common sense solution to this problem that would not only satisfy fans, residents and taxpayers, but also show that they are willing to work hard to arrive at those solutions.

So far, they haven't been, and I'd vote against the penny tax again, just as I'd surely vote now or in the
near-future against any proposed sales tax increase geared towards a new Broward Courthouse building.    

Also, it looks like Robin Rorapaugh of Hollywood will be formally approved to serve on the much-needed
County Ethics Commission as Commissioner Suzanne Gunzburger's nominee.

As of now, I plan on attending after a quick chat at the State Attorney's Office, so if you have some time,
please consider heading-up, too.

Tusday's Broward County Commission meeting agenda is at:
_________________________________________

Dear Beach Residents:

When we last met at my beach erosion town hall meeting, I promised to update you on the City of Hollywood's efforts to renourish its beaches. As you know, they are eroding at an ever-alarming rate.

The City has already made application to the State for matching funds for a truck haul project. As you may know, we are getting closer to Broward County beginning its much anticipated sand bypass program. The sand bypass project is, essentially, designed to help re-establish the ocean's natural flow of sand southward, which is being blocked by the jetties at Port Everglades. It is a great project that over time can help increase the volume of sand on our beaches. Below, please find a Fact Sheet regarding the sand bypass project for your information.

Unfortunately, not everybody sees it that way. In early January, I went to Fort Lauderdale City Hall, and addressed the Fort Lauderdale Mayor and Commissioners at a public forum. I was given an opportunity to speak, and tried to convey to them how important the sand bypass was to our residents and our way of life.

Notwithstanding, the Fort Lauderdale City Commission voted to OPPOSE the sand bypass project, and are urging the Broward County Commission to NOT move forward. In short, our Fort Lauderdale elected official counterparts are getting an earful from their residents who believe that we are trying to "take" their sand, so we simply have more. Truth be told, OUR sand is not getting to OUR beaches, because Port Everglades is blocking the natural flow of sand southward. Period.

I am emailing you because we need to re-double our efforts to protect the sand bypass project. I'd like to tell you that the forces who oppose this valuable project are a fringe group, but they are not. Two Broward County Commissioners who represent Fort Lauderdale beach residents, and are listening to those folks, may try to block the project.

I believe that a majority of the Broward County Commission will listen to reason, listen to the scientists who support the project and listen to objective facts about why the sand bypass project must move full steam ahead. But, it wouldn't hurt to have one thousand beach residents write the Broward County Commission about why the sand bypass project is so important.

As mayor, I will do everything in my power to prioritize beach renourishment, including spending City funds in a strategic way, to get the desired result we all wish to see. I hope you will write (as opposed to e-mail, which might be less effective) your Broward County Commissioners at the following address:

Broward County Commission Offices
954-357-7000
www.broward.org/countygov
115 S. Andrews Ave., Room 421
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Mayor Ritter
sritter@broward.org

Vice Mayor Keechl
kkeechl@broward.org

Commissioner Gunzburger
sgunzburger@broward.org

Commissioner Wexler
lwexler@broward.org

Commissioner Rodstrom
jrodstrom@broward.org

Commissioner Wasserman-Rubin
dwassermanrubin@broward.org

Commissioner Lieberman
ilieberman@broward.org

Commissioner Jacobs
kjacobs@broward.org

Commissioner Eggelletion
jeggelletion@broward.org

Tell your Broward County Commissioners that we have been waiting decades for the beach renourishment project to begin. I NEED YOU TO FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO EVERY HOLLYWOOD, HALLANDALE BEACH AND DANIA BEACH RESIDENT YOU KNOW. There are hundreds of people, right now, trying to kill the sand bypass project, and we must speak up. If we don't, who will?

Thank you for your time,

Peter Bober
Mayor
CITY OF HOLLYWOOD
954.921.3321 Tel
954.921.3386 Fax
pbober@hollywoodfl.org

---------------------------------------------------------------

 FACT SHEET: Broward County Sand By-Pass Project

• Sand by-passing is the process of artificially transferring near shore sand around a beach barrier (Port Everglades).

• 85% of beach erosion in Florida is caused by inlets that interrupt the movement of sand.

• The proposed project will build a sand trap, modify the North Jetty at Port Everglades, modify the rubble shoal, create a rubble barrier, and provide up to 80,000 cubic yards of sand on the adjacent beach.

• Sand will be collected from the excavated deposition basin adjacent to the north jetty of the Port, anticipated to be approximately 50,000 cy/year.

• Basin will be dredged every three years and transported south and deposited on the beach at John U. Lloyd State Park.

• Expect to see a benefit to Hollywood's beaches over the coming years, as the sand slowly drifts southward.

• Permits are anticipated to be issued by the summer of 2009.

• Broward County anticipates Port Everglades Sand Bypassing project to commence in 2010.

_________

The Cynthia Barnett article that ran in Florida Trend magazine October 1, 2008

FLORIDA'S BEACHES

Fixing Florida's Beach Erosion Is Expensive

Sand Trap: Another storm, another round of beach erosion, another round of questions about renourishment.

http://www.floridatrend.com/article.asp?aID=49227486.4529268.647114.9201924.5324948.079&aID2=49769

___________

Last February 15th's CBS-4's report, Millions Wasted Trying To Stop Beach Erosion

http://cbs4.com/iteam/beach.erosion.Dr.2.653210.html

________________________________________

Fort Lauderdale Stadium, 1301 N.W. 55th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309