Showing posts with label Hollywood CRA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood CRA. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2019

#HollywoodFL updates re Public Parking @ Hollywood Beach; possible walking police patrols in Downtown Hollywood from Friday thru Sunday nights; news re the University Station redevelopment; Have a feeling all of these issues will come up Tuesday night at Comm. Peter Hernandez's 6:30 pm Town Hall mtg at the Lippman Center

#HollywoodFL re Public parking @ Hollywood Beach, possible walking police patrols in Downtown Hollywood from Friday thru Sunday nights, news re the University Station redevelopment...
Have a feeling all of these issues will come up Tuesday night at Comm. Peter Hernandez's 6:30 pm Town Hall mtg at the Lippman Center

First, from city's press release:
District 2 Town Hall Meeting
Tuesday, October 1
District 2 Commissioner Peter Hernandez is hosting a Town Hall Meeting on Tuesday, October 1 
from 6:30 to 8:30 pm at the Fred Lippman Multi-Purpose Center at 2030 Polk Street in Hollywood. 
Find out about septic to sewer conversion and water infrastructure replacement in the Royal Poinciana area. There will also be information about downtown security (roving patrols) and low to moderate income availability of city funds. Refreshments will be provided. 
For more information, contact Commissioner Hernandez at 954.247.7136 or the Office of the 
Mayor and Commissioners at 954.921.3321  

The unmentioned good news in that press release is that my friend Claude Luciani, stalwart Hollywood animal supporter and owner of Pizza Rustica in Downtown Hollywood, located opposite two of the most popular places in all of Hollywood -and I'm happy to say, advertisers on my blog!- The Greek Joint and Mickey Byrne's Irish Pub & Restaurant, will be bringing examples of his oh-so delicious pizza 🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕 at the meeting, so be sure to bring your pizza taste buds.
But leave plenty for me, as I love Claude's pizza! 🍕




1. re Public parking @ Hollywood Beach.

The issues at stake here are self-evident but please read the full thread. 







2. re possibility of evening walking police patrols in Downtown Hollywood.

First my tweets and then some discussion of perceived safety problems and a possible solution.




As most of you know, over the course of a typical month, I go to all kinds of public meetings at Hollywood City Hall, as well as to numerous Civic Association meetings being held throughout the city, so I can keep tabs on the evolving concerns of the city's residents and Small Business owners.
But I also spend a lot of time during the week in Downtown Hollywood in the afternoons and evenings -and not just on weekends- talking to individual owners and managers of restaurants, bars, retail shops, boutiques as well as office buildings about their concerns about Hollywood in general and the Downtown area in particular.
People who, despite having lenty of choices to do so elsewhere, have personally decided to invest themselves emotionally and financially in Hollywood's Downtown area, and want it to be much better, safer and more-interesting than it currently is or has been in the past.

They are long past tired of hearing excuses, alibis and unkept promises to "fix things."
Simply put, they are also not buying the popular perception hereabouts that you really can't force the City of Hollywood or the Hollywood CRA or Broward County or FDOT to acknowledge, recognize and actually resolve problems with anything under some six-month projection.

Over the past few years, but most especially the past year, both during the 9-10 months while I was out-of-town, and then after I returned to Hollywood in late April, these same stakeholders who are invested in so many ways in this city's success, have expressed themselves to me in increasingly angry and ominous tones about what they feel is going on now.
They are particularly upset about how this past summer's business seemed especially dead, with few events going on in the city that would attract genuine crowds of visitors and consumers to the larger area as a whole, not just to the immediate area around Young Circle.

So, despite some positive developments over the past year, including the introduction of some new businesses and eager faces, like my talented photography friend, Noël de Christián, who opened up an amazing gallery bearing his name a few months ago on the west side of S. 20th Avenue, and my friend John Wiltsey, who last month opened up his Camp Cocktail Bar + Grill on the corner of  N. 21st Avenue and Hollywood Blvd., many Downtown stakeholders feel like there is a palpable sense of complacency among the local powers-that-be that can simply not be allowed to continue moving forward.
Some dynamic changes in attitude and behavior are needed lest these ingrained public perceptions among Hollywood and regional residents go unchallenged and continue to grow.

To these stakeholders, there's a very strong public perception among both Hollywood residents as well as from nearby cities, that too many parts of the Downtown area are not as safe as they
should be. And perception IS reality, whatever the actual Hollywood criminal statistics may say.

To be honest, I've personally been stopped DOZENS of times over the past six months by either Hollywood residents or visitors/tourists who did not understand why there were seemingly uniformed Hollywood Police officers in the Downtown area every night who seemed to always congregate on Hollywood Blvd. -and take up too much space there- yet who never venture more than ten feet away from their patrol cars.
To paraphrase, "Why don't they stop leaning on those damn cars and actually walk around and
see what's going on and stop trouble before it happens?"

I've explained every time, often until I simply can't repeat myself again, that in most cases, these police officers were/are "off-duty," and there because they are detailed to a specific business that 
is paying for that, and thus, not "on-duty," per se.
As you might imagine, though true, this response of mine tends not to either placate or delight 
most people.
They just shake their heads and say that they visit plenty of other cities in South Florida and the 
rest of the state where they see walking police patrols at night and why can't that happen here 
in Hollywood.

Just so you know, over the past few years, an increasing number of the successful people I know 
who live in the Hollywood Lakes area have felt emboldened to tell me that they personally feel like 
they are safer and have more choices of things to do if they go to Aventura, Sunny Isles, Bal Harbour 
or up to certain Fort Lauderdale-area neighborhoods.
They tell me they wish they were spending that money in Hollywood, but that their perception is 
what it is, and until they see some kind of tangible sign that the city and the CRA are changing it, 
why should they alter their behavior and go there with their spouses or families?

I should mention that women seem to find the current reality even more ridiculous than men, 
which given where the city's two public parking garages are located, in not-always bustling areas 
at night, perhaps explains itself.

"David, do they even have operating cameras in the public parking garages?"
People consistently tell me the answer is NO, so perhaps that is something simple that 
the city and CRA should explore changing, since many woman I've spoken to feel the 
public garages are just as likely a site with potential for harm for themselves and their 
guests as any other spot in the Downtown area. That perception must change.

Towards that end, over the past few months, District 2 Commissioner Peter Hernandez and many Downtown business owners have been calling for the city to institute nighttime walking patrols in the Downtown area to assuage people's reasonable beliefs and directly change those self-evident public perceptions about public safety.
Last week at the CRA HQ on Harrison Street, I was one of about two dozen interested parties at the latest meeting Comm. Hernandez has held since June with downtown business owners about their concerns. CRA Executive Director Jorge Camejo was also there as he was at previous meetings, along with a few reps from the Hollywood Police Dept..

The possibility of having these nighttime walking patrols, at least on Friday, Saturday and Sunday 
nights, was broached once again.
I think there's a reasonable possibility that the CRA may be willing to put some money forward to help pay for those costs, but it will not happen unless the public wants it and expresses themselves to the people who will actually be deciding the matter, that is, the seven members of the Hollywood City Commission/CRA Board of Directors.

---------------------------------------------------
3. news re University Station redevelopment



Redevelopment Opportunity University Station

Univ Station redev opp

Hollywood Accepting Proposals for the Redevelopment of University Station Site

The City of Hollywood, Florida, received an unsolicited proposal submitted under the provisions of Section 255.065, Florida Statutes, Public-Private Partnerships, for “University Station” to finance, develop, construct and manage an urban, mixed-use project on approximately 2.5 acres of City-owned real estate in Downtown Hollywood. The City-owned site is located along a major north/south corridor known as the Dixie Highway/Florida East Coast Railway Corridor, between Fillmore, Taylor, and Polk Streets, and adjacent to N. 21st Avenue (“Site”). The Site currently houses the City of Hollywood’s Shuffleboard Center and Courts, a public parking/DocumentCenter/View/16458/University_Station_Barry_University_Lease lot and a repurposed former fire station that is leased to Barry University College of Nursing & Health Sciences. The Site is also located within the Downtown District of the City’s Community Redevelopment Agency.
The City has published the required legal notice of the acceptance of an unsolicited proposal under the provision of 255.065 and is willing to accept other proposals to finance, develop, construct and manage an urban, mixed-use project on this property. Competitive proposals should be for an innovative, mixed-use, market-driven concept that takes full advantage of the Site. The City has determined the unsolicited proposal is sufficient for consideration on a preliminary basis and will accept other proposals for the same project during this notification period. No final decision has been made relative to selecting any proposal for this site.



Last Tuesday, September 24th, from just before 3 pm until about 5:15, I was at Hollywood City Hall in Room 421, up on the locked floor, for the City of Hollywood's Evaluation Committee meeting re the P3/University Station redevelopment project that both Pinnacle Housing Group and Housing Trust Group, LLC want.

The public notice was only put up before 3 pm the day before, after I had already been at City Hall around lunch time. To be honest, I was very suspicious that something fishy was happening, since for just barely 24 hours to lapse between an announcement and an actual meeting is very unusual in Hollywood, though was not so uncommon in Hallandale Beach during the lamentable reign of Joy Cooper, with the goal of keeping the public out of the room and in the dark. :-(

Public perception-wise, it seemed to me to be an especially bad move, too, especially for such an important project that has the potential to help positively transform the Downtown Hollywood corridor area from the FEC train tracks going back east to US-1, as was so often
repeated at the meeting itself.
I was the first person in the meeting room not on the Eval Comm. or with a business interest in it, though there was one person there already monitoring it on behalf of one party's attorney.

Right before the meeting started, literally, while outside the door and standing next to the window that offers an interesting aerial view of the immediate area to the east, I called my friend, North Central Civic Association president Patricia "Patty" Antrican, who has talked to
me about this project for many months, and asked her to come by if she could, though I knew she'd likely still be busy because North Central was having its monthly meeting that night, and I assumed Patty was still trying to add some public speakers to the agenda for her typically large crowd of very concerned residents and business owners to hear over at the Lippman Center later.
Fortunately, she was able to get over there pretty quick and caught most of the Eval. Comm.'s discussions and points about what they thought about the two parties eager to control that property with so much potential for being a dynamic force in the city.

Patty and I, as well as anybody paying close attention, knows that the tract under discussion there, offers lots of interesting possibilities, and a chance to reshape those public perceptions about what was and is possible in Hollywood, especially if there's a train station nearby that allows residents to easily go points north and south on the FEC tracks towards Downtown Miami and Fort Lauderdale.

As regular readers of my 12-year old blog know, I've attended dozens of transportation meetings over the years, most though not all about the proposed Tri-Rail Coastal line that is my preferred choice because it services the largest number of people and accomplished a VERY POSITIVE public policy goal -mobility. Increased ease of travel

I am not at all sold on the idea of having that location be a Virgin Train stop for the train north to Fort Lauderdale, West Paln Beach and eventually, Orlando, and south to Miami, since tickets would be so much more expensive and draw a fraction of the public of what those well-located tracks will bear.

I took about 9 pages of copious notes about what was said, and will soon post some of them to the blog about it in depth.
But for now, it was clear to me that the two most important of several concerns expressed were:
1.) Whether the two groups were prepared to be a key and vocal part of the referendun process if they are selected and get it thru a purchase instead of a lease, as they would prefer, and,
2.) What would Pinnacle's level of interest in constructing the market rate building component of the project still exit if they did not get the available tax credits within two years?

I reconfirmed this afternoon with Hollywood Procurement Dept. Director Paul Bassar that the Oral Evaluations for Pinnacle and HTG will be next Monday, October 7th, at Hollywood City Hall in Room 215, starting at 1:30 p.m. and likely ending about 4:30 pm or so.
I strongly suggest you bring some caffeine and something to munch on!


ICYMI: My last blog post was this!
Can development and historic Downtown #HollywoodFL co-exist? Current public pushback against possible demolition of a historic Hollywood Bank Bldg. to make way for the Soleste
Hollywood project, makes one wonder whether it can or not 

Dave
David B. Smith

Wednesday, August 7, 2019

#HollywoodFL - Make plans to attend tonight's City of Hollywood "Strategic Plan Community Outreach Meeting" -gripefest?- at 7 pm at Hollywood City Hall. It ought to be be very interesting, and by interesting I mean some simmering, long-overdue community frustration with city policies and practices will likely be heard about matters that have been ignored or taken for granted for YEARS

Looking west at City of Hollywood City Hall, Wednesday August 6th, 2019. 
Photo by © Hallandale Beach/Hollywood Blog, All Rights Reserved.

Those of you who thought that there would be little-to-no discussion of serious issues on this blog about the City of Hollywood and its policies and practices until the end of the month, when the City Commission was scheduled to have its next meeting on Wednesday August 28th are... #wrong.
No, today is that day.

The Hollywood City Commission -including Mayor Josh Levy, fresh from a family vacation in Italy and Greece that looked amazing judging by the photos I've seen- will all be on hand tonight to listen to the community have some quality time speaking forthrightly at 7:00 pm at Hollywood City Hall in what is officially being called a "Strategic Plan Community Outreach Meeting." 

I think we can all be forgiven for thinking and knowing in advance that it will also be a bit of a gripefest, too, not just for the most devoted civic activists in the community who are tired of being stroked on the head but seeing their concerns either ignored or given short shrift, but especially for many people who work during the day and who usually can't make Wednesday morning or afternoon Hollywood CRA and City Commission meetings that go on for hours.
Obviously, the latter are also not able to show up for the Public Comments portion of those very same meetings at 5 pm twice a month.

While there are certainly MANY MORE residents and Small Business owners in Hollywood who watch the Hollywood CRA or City Commission meetings on TV or via streaming online than was ever true of Hallandale Beach's meetings when I lived there for 11 years prior to 2014 -and at roughly 95% of all the myriad HB CRA, City Commission or Quadrant meetings- the current reality is that very important decisions are routinely made at Hollywood City Hall that the average Hollywood resident or business owner knows nothing about.

That is, until they hear about it after-the-fact from a well-informed, civic-minded friend like me, read about it on my fact-based blog, or see something about it on TV newscasts or somewhere in the Sun-Sentinel, and if the latter, it's usually bad news, isn't it, not something to be happy about or brag about?

Here's some quick background information on tonight's meeting, via the city's Communications office:

Take the Survey to Add Your Input
June 2019 marked the beginning of the City’s work on developing a new Strategic Plan. 

The plan will establish goals, set a schedule and include ways to measure successes. Mayor Levy, Vice Mayor Callari and the City Commissioners, along with the City management team, have already developed ideas for the City’s Mission, Vision and Core Values statements which will form the foundation for the plan, but no vision for a city is complete without the voices of its residents! 
Your input is critical for the development of the Strategic Plan so we ask that you take a few moments to lend your voice, experience and expertise to this important process. Take the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HollywoodStakeholder

REMINDER: Hollywood Strategic Plan Community Outreach Meeting August 7
All are invited to a community outreach meeting regarding the Strategic Plan on Wednesday, August 7th from 7:00 – 8:00 p.m. at City Hall, 2600 Hollywood Boulevard, Room 219. 

The goal of the meeting is to provide an update on the City’s strategic planning effort, including a preview of the new mission and vision statements and identification of core values. 
Participants will have an opportunity to ask questions and provide input and suggestions on what they would like for the City of Hollywood to become.


I have more comments about tonight's meeting below the print out of the survey questions that I've got for you to peruse below, but before you read them, please keep in mind the following:

Who -exactly- are the people/committee at Hollywood City Hall or the consultants hired by the city that not only came up with these rather narrow questions, but more importantly, provide a very narrow range of possible answers that should strike many of you more common sense types as specifically designed to limit the range of debate?

For instance, why is there no question about whether or not in the year 2019 there is any current service being provided by the City of Hollywood that the respondent believes could/would/should be better run, made more-efficient, or made cheaper for citizens if spun off to third-parties, removing that costs off the taxpayer?

Given all the opportunities during the day, week, month and year that City of Hollywood employees have to push/negate or impede public policy and practices and insert their own personal preferences or beliefs, why in this forum are city employees being solicited to participate?
Especially if they do not live within the city limits, as most city employees don't, especially first responders?
Isn't the logical result of that inclusion simply to have the legitimate concerns or fears of Hollywood's citizen taxpayers, Small Business owners and stakeholders watered down by the influence of the army of City of Hollywood employees?

I'm on very good terms with dozens of city employees, and am very friendly towards a few, but that doesn't change the fact that I believe that Hollywood citizen's input should count for more than that of city employees, especially if they do NOT actually live within the city.

On a survey about the future of the City of Hollywood, shouldn't the question of whether or not you actually live in Hollywood be the first question, not the 7th?

City of Hollywood 2019 Stakeholder Survey


The City of Hollywood has recently begun to develop a new Strategic Plan to improve city services. The Strategic Plan will help establish the City’s Mission, Vision, and Goals for the future.

You are invited to help in the planning process by completing this survey.

The Strategic Plan will go before the City Commission for adoption in November 2019.


*1. City’s Mission - What should be the City’s main purpose?
Please rank the following from 1 to 3, with 1 being most important and 3 being least important.

Provide high-quality service
Promote a healthy and positive quality of life
Plan for the future

*2. City’s Vision - What should the City be in the future?
Please rank the following from 1 to 3, with 1 being most important and 3 being least important.

Become South Florida’s premier city for high-quality living
Become a destination for recreation and tourism
Become a center for higher education (e.g., colleges, universities, art and design schools, trade schools, technology institutes)

*3. City’s Values - When working with or encountering city staff, what is most important to you?
Please rank the following from 1 to 3, with 1 being the most important and 3 being the least important.

Integrity
Professionalism
Innovative problem solving

*4. Current City Services - How are we doing?
Questions 4 and 5 refer to services the City of Hollywood provides (e.g., water and sewer service, garbage and recycling, building permits, code enforcement, utility billing and payment, Police, Fire Rescue, Beach Safety, City Parks).

How satisfied are you with the quality of City services provided to you? Please mark one box.


Very Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very Satisfied

5. Current City Services: How can we do better?
If you are dissatisfied, please tell us what service(s) you are referring to and why.

*6. Would you recommend that a friend or relative live in Hollywood?
On a scale of 0-10, with 0 being "Not at all likely" and 10 being "very likely," how likely are you to recommend living in the City of Hollywood to a friend or relative? Please mark one box.

1 - Not Likely at all
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 - Very Likely

*7. Are you a resident of the City of Hollywood?

Yes
No

*8. Is your job located within the City of Hollywood?

Yes
No

9. Do you own/operate a business within the City of Hollywood?

Yes
No

*10. Are you an employee of the City of Hollywood?

Yes
No

As you ponder these questions being asked by the city, here are some other Hollywood (and SE Broward-related) things to be thinking about while you think of your own questions to ask tonight.
None of them come under rubric "strategic," but they are kind of curious in my opinion and that of oters who are familiar with them.

A.) Are Hollywood-area schools going to be fully prepared later this month when the school year starts to meet the new security standards now in place for Florida schools, which the Broward School Board and Supt. Robert Runcie opposed?
Will that also be the case at South Broward High School, where Patricia Brown will be taking over as their new principal?

B.) In retrospect, is the current city-owned golf shooting range on S. Park Road adjacent to the City of Hollywood Police Dept. HQ really the best long-term site for the new Police Station headquarters that'll eventually be built with General Obligation bond money approved by Hollywood voters last November?


Is there a better location available now or perhaps in the near-future which could be made available if the city were to entertain the idea of a land swap with a current land-owner?
Perhaps something that would allow future expansion of the planned new HQ in the future, either as an addition to the proposed structure or immediately adjacent to it?
I mentioned this last year here on the blog because I was really struck by the lack of imagination
at City Hall given how important the physical location of the Police Dept HQ is, given what is said to be the sorry physical state of the current building on Hollywood Blvd. on prime commercial real estate that could be generating lots of much-needed tax revenue for the city instead of producing... nothing.

I heard no real honest discussion on this issue -much of it taking place when I was out-of-town for several months before returning in mid-April- and I still feel that the decision is moving forward only because the city already owns the land, and NOT because the case has been successfully made that the proposed site is actually the best one or even among the top five possible sites for the Hollywood of 10, 15 and 25 years from now.

C.) Hollywood Beach Golf Course - Gosh, where to even start on this?


First, why was there zero public engagement via a public meeting in a centrally located facility, whether the City Hall chambers, or the David or Lippman Community Center in the many months since last November's GO Bond vote was approved that'd allow Hollywood-area golfers to meet and discuss with city officials what sorts of changes, improvements or transformations that they -the actual users and consumers of what's being proposed- would like to see at the city-owned Hollywood Beach Golf Course? 

I attended the city's multi-hour long Evaluation Committee meeting in June and was NOT at all 

happy with much of what I heard in the way of both questions or lack of logical follow-up from respondents that was non-responsive or inadequate.


I have REAL concerns about the Eval Comm.'s reasoning in ranking since extraneous things like using the course for water storage in flooding situations seemed MUCH MORE important to the Eval Comm. than whether local golfers actually would ENJOY a fun, challenging golf course that they'd pay for and return to play again and again.
To actually make it fun and attractive and make money
Which, of course, is THE POINT of fixing the golf course!

Judging by some of the very dumb questions I heard asked, I don't think anyone on the Eval Comm. 
even plays golf
It reminded me of the maxim that a camel is a horse designed by a committee.

I was THE only citizen present in the Commission Chambers for all the presentations and dsat near the front on the right side while the varius teams of presenters all sat on the eft side where city employees usually sit at City Commission meetings.

Mayor Josh Levy came in for a few minutes during one presentation, but sat in the back row and I didn't speak with him about my growing concerns while he was present, nor have I contacted him about it, though I've been meaning to.



(Perhaps over a bagel/sandwich and some coffee at The Panera Bread located on Sheridan Street and 49th Street, which has become my new go-to place on weekends, and which is much nicer, saner and quieter than the one in Hallandale Beach that so many of you associated me with the past 15 years. Which I appreciated this past Sunday when I was marooned there during one of the many multi-hour long downpours we've experienced the past two weeks. But I got in lots of quality writing time, so...)

By the way, for what it's worth, the Matthew Dusenberry group's presentation was the finest oral presentation I've ever seen on any subject or issue at Hollywood City Hall, even beating the Zyscovich Architect group's plan many years ago back when they were bidding to do the city's Master Plan. 
A contract they received in large part because of Bernard Zyscovich.
And yet in my opinion, Dusenberry's was better and yet they were ranked third.
Think about that.

This process explains my current sense of incredulity, since Dusenberry was rated first by a large margin over the second and third-ranked firms after the first round of voting based on their written proposals, yet after all the presentations, Dusenberry Design, was rated #3, with first going to the McCumber Group, which I liked but thought came in second place.

In my opinion, the members of the Eval Comm. did not seem to properly represent the interests of the city's golfers, the very people who will actually USE the facility after all, and take into consideration what they want to see done.
If there had been a public meeting where all the members of the committee who judge and rank the responses had been required to attend, I would have been a lot happier and found it easier to respect the results. But THESE particular results?
Nope.

I heard plenty of questions of respondents about various aspects of water retention/removal on the golf course, following heavy storms or localized flooding in the Hollywood Lakes area, which is not an insignificant concern, of course.
But to repeat this point, I heard precious little that took into account what the the new "experience" of playing the Hollywood Beach Golf Course would be.
Various firms talked in general terms about remaining true to the architect of the course's original intent or making slight changes in them, but the fact that I was the only member of the public who was in attendance over several hours should concern you if you had hoped that the golf course will be much-improved over what many think is its current sad, down-on-its-heel shape and vibe.

Hollywood always likes to talk about how it is in the middle of everything and near everything.
That's fine. But that also means that in a competitive marketplace, if the player experience at Hollywood Beach is not one that is either fun or challenging for golfers, why would they want to return in the future?
And if they decide that the new proposed changes aren't enough to persuade them, then what is the purpose of the city owning a golf course they lack both the imagination and capability of managing properly?

I was very, very discouraged with what I saw and heard, and after speaking to many of my friends in the city who DO play golf, given that there is an actual end-user and consumer for the facility, city and nearby golfers, the people whose actually pay to use the facility, why were their concerns and that of the golfing community seemingly at the bottom of the totem pole? 

D.) Speaking of curious matters that defy credulity, how has the city resolved this situation from May with FDOT, one that directly threatens the future of a Hollywood business on State Road 441 that's existed since 1957?
If they have done something to fix this, I have heard nothing about it, including from the very people in this city who usually know and whom I have specifically asked.

Watch the news video at the URL below with reporter Jeff Weinsier of Local 10 News and you will be shaking your head in incredulity at how something like this happens and how yet again the city is caught flatfooted.
Never once do you hear anything about the city's Chamber of Commerce or members of the City Commission getting personally involved to try stick up for a longtime city business when dealing with FDOT esentially giving it a death sentence.
The business owner is, literally, on his own.


Hollywood Pizza Parlor Owner Fears Business Will Close Over Parking Spot Issue
A South Florida business that has survived for 62 years has hit a major roadblock, and there is some concern it may not be able to keep the doors open.

https://www.local10.com/news/florida/hollywood/hollywood-pizza-parlor-owner-fears-business-will-close-over-parking-spot-issue

More Hollywood stories at https://www.local10.com/hollywood

See you tonight!