Showing posts with label David Landsberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Landsberg. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Part 2 of More lumps of coal in the Christmas stocking of One Herald Plaza for another consistently lousy year of journalism at the Miami Herald, esp. covering Broward County


This is the follow-up email sent yesterday in a recent series to Miami Herald President and Publisher David Landsberg, with cc's once again to Herald executive editor Aminda Marques and managing editor Rick Hirsch, plus the same discerning elected officials and activists in Broward County -with a few more thrown in for good measure- regarding the Herald's continuing unsatisfactory news coverage of Broward County, which so often is either invisible when it should be anything but, or obtuse and condescending when it should be penetrating and hard-hitting.
Neither is acceptable.

I also detail some thoughts and suggestions about rapidly changing the dynamic there, using examples at the Washington Post and Aftonbladet, before, like the Titanic almost 100 years ago come April, the McClatchy-owned Herald hits the iceberg and goes under.
Be assured, time is NOT on Mr. Landsberg's side.
-----

December 20th, 2011
3:30 p.m.

Dear Mr. Landsberg:

A follow-up to my email of last week, owing to the fact that last night, I once again saw yet another one of the glaring longstanding problems at the newspaper you run, and not for the first or even second time.

Just as I've already written about previously a few times on my blog when the Herald ran a multi-weeks old story about Donald Trump in the "Breaking News" section, this is what appeared on the Herald's Broward homepage 
December 19th at 11:21 p.m. under "Breaking News"

-----
Breaking News 

Teen becomes Deerfield Beach school’s Santa Claus 

Forfeits cost Boyd Anderson district title 

Boca’s Lynn University to host final presidential debate of 2012 

K-9 injured in Plantation crash to be released from hospital 

BSO plans to stop dispatching Fort Lauderdale 911 calls 

Former Broward sheriff Nick Navarro dies 

Blackout of Miami Dolphins game averted 

Teen boys charged with friend's murder expected in court » More

Just a few minutes of investigating reveals that of the so-called eight "Breaking News" stories, the most recent one is from two weeks ago, and only half were written by Herald reporters.
These articles, whatever else they may be, are nobody's reasonable idea of "Breaking News" in Broward County. 

Story #1, Teen becomes Deerfield Beach school’s Santa Claus, is from December 8, 2011, and was written by Alysha Khan

Story #2, Forfeits cost Boyd Anderson district title, is from November 8, 2011, and
was written by Andre C. Fernandez and Manny Navarro


Story #3, Boca’s Lynn University to host final presidential debate of 2012, is from 
October 31, 2011 and was written by "Miami Herald Staff"


Story #4, K-9 injured in Plantation crash to be released from hospital, is from October 10, 2011 and was written by Linda Trischitta of the Sun-Sentinel 


Story #5, BSO plans to stop dispatching Fort Lauderdale 911 calls, is from September 30, 2011 and was written by Scott Wyman when he was still with the Sun-Sentinel.


Story #6, Former Broward sheriff Nick Navarro dies, is from September 29, 2011, and was written by Michael Vasquez.


Story #7, Blackout of Miami Dolphins game averted, is from September 15th, 2011
and was written by Craig Davis of the Sun-Sentinel


Story #8, Teen boys charged with friend's murder expected in court, is from August 17, 2011, and was written by Sonia Isger and Alexandra Seltzerof the Palm Beach Post

In short, Mr. Landsberg, nothing remotely resembling LIVE, LOCAL and Late-Breaking...
And the Herald still hasn't written anything in print or online about the new Broward County redistricting map voted upon last Tuesday by the County Commission, which in large part prompted that email of mine to you in the first place, even though I'd been thinking about sending you something for well over a year.

Yet not surprisingly, there was something online by Martha Brannigan about Miami-Dade's new map the same day, yesterday, at 7:24 p.m. 

But almost exactly a week after the redistricting vote here in Broward County, NADA about the same issue, affecting roughly 40-45% of this media market's population?

This gets to my -and other's- longstanding contention that more than is either logical or reasonable, far too much of the Herald's reporting is based on geography, NOT actual news value or impact.
That is to say, geographical proximity to you and your HQ on Biscayne Bay.

Witness the embarrassing debacle in March with the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, and how abysmally slow the Herald (and Sun-Sentinel) was to wake-up hours after-the-fact, which I wrote about here:

Mr. Landsberg, I wasn't joking about what I said to you in my email last Friday about hoping
that you were busy working on that "plan" to change the dynamics of both the Herald's physical copy and the website, because if I can notice all this within just a few minutes of looking at the Herald's poorly-designed website, so heavy with ads at the top and right column, imagine what I would find if...

Look at the DAILY measures the Washington Post goes to get its execs, editors, reporters, columnists and bloggers in front of the public in their community -where I lived for 15 years- so that they are more than a little aware of what's going on in the minds of their savvy readers, esp. what's bothering them, via community forums and their very popular LIVE online chats.
Chats that I've even participated in myself and which have readable transcripts archived on their website, making them great resources.

Not that you're probably aware of it, but consider what the largest national daily in Sweden
-Aftonbladet- based in Stockholm, did when they wanted to think outside-the-box.

I eagerly read their website everyday and can tell you that they created a place on their own website where they challenged their readers and critics to look at what their tentative plans were for re-designing the site, a tabloid-sized paper that in many ways largely sets the daily conversations and talking points that will take place that day in offices, homes, schools, trains and coffee shops across the country.
And they dared their readers to improve upon their own plans.

Now anyone can dare someone, but what they did was actually put something on their website that gave readers a means to show management -and Aftonbladet's 2.5 million daily readers- what their suggested 'better mousetrap' looked like.

Not surprisingly in a well-educated and talented country of news readers, some of those suggestions WERE BETTER than management's.

See Hur skulle du bygga om aftonbladet.se?

So tell me, Mr, Landsberg, what's wrong with letting the best ideas win in Miami?

Sometime on Thursday afternoon, unless something else comes up that prevents it, I'll be posting to my blog just some of the valid criticisms of you and your management team, editors and reporters that I and other well-informed Herald readers I know are painfully aware of, as well as mention stories that you all have either foolishly ignored, given short-shrift to, or otherwise marginalized for inexplicable reasons.

The logical result of that attitude at One Herald Plaza was giving the South Florida public -especially the readers in Broward County, my friends and neighbors- considerably LESS than what they were reasonably entitled to expect from the Herald in the year 2011.
A LOT less.


------


The Donald Trump-related blog posts of mine that I reference above, in describing Herald management's longstanding unawareness that they have been and continue to describe stories as Breaking News on their awful website when they are, in fact, old stories -which I meant to link to in the email but forgot to!- are described here:
July 21, 2011, Miami Herald grave robbers at it again! Herald's threadbare Broward homepage runs 15-day old story as Breaking News to fill-up space!, http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/miami-herald-grave-robbers-at-it-again.html


I can't emphasize enough that if you care about the interplay of journalism, technology, innovation and the 21st Century news media, you are making a big mistake if you don't subscribe to The Monday Note newsletter edited by Frédéric Filloux.

In its own way, it's consistently interesting and amazing in the same ways that the late and much-missed manhattan, inc. magazine and Spy were, both magazines that I was a charter subscriber to when I lived in Chicago and Evanston in the mid-'80's, and which I devoured from cover-to-cover upon arrival in my mailbox because of their consistent quality writing and insight. 
Oh for those days of penetrating stories on the people and personalities behind LBO and hostile takeovers and "short-fingered vulgarians.")

I actually reference The Monday Note above in the paragraphs about what was going on this year in redesigning Aftonbladet. http://www.aftonbladet.se/

Unless something crazy happens between now and then, always possible when you live South Florida, I will be posting those promised examples of Herald nonfeasance and journalistic apathy from above, tomorrow afternoon.
Trust me, just like Santa Claus, I've been keeping track of who's been bad.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

For another consistently lousy year of journalism at the Miami Herald, esp. covering Broward County, more lumps of coal in the Christmas stocking of One Herald Plaza -Part 1


Miami Herald vending machine in front of Denny's restaurant, Hallandale Beach, FL.July 3, 2011 photo by South Beach Hoosier

Below is the email that I sent last Friday afternoon to David Landsberg, President and Publisher of McClatchy's Miami Herald, with cc's to Herald Executive Editor Aminda Marques and Managing Editor Rick Hirsch, along with certain Broward County elected officials and activists I keep in regular contact with. 


This is the first of two emails sent directly to him about the Herald's considerably lackluster performance for the year 2011, where sins and errors of the past were neither corrected nor forgiven but merely repeated over-and-over to an inexplicable fair-thee-well. 


In the subject header that day, I wrote: More lumps of coal in your Christmas stocking for such a consistently lousy year of journalism at the Miami Herald covering Broward County.
-----


December 16, 2011



Dear Mr. Landsberg:


You're the publisher and president of the Herald, and yet as of 4 p.m., it's now been more than 65 hours since the Broward County Commission formally approved new district maps based on 2010 Census information, and as of right now, your newspaper has printed absolutely NOTHING about it in-print or online. 
http://www.miamiherald.com/search_results?aff=1100&q=redistricting
Nada!


But then the Herald also NEVER wrote in-print about any of the myriad issues arising out of the many public meetings that've been held in the county the past few months about that required redistricting in Broward.
Nothing about what the maps might look like given that some members will soon be termed-out, or even whether or not it was likely that a 'Hispanic-majority' district might somehow be carved-out of it somewhere, which might necessarily change the county's current dynamic.
http://www.broward.org/Redistricting/Pages/Default.aspx


Congratulations!


That's certainly entirely in keeping with the strange and counter-intuitive journalism decision-making that beleaguered Broward readers have continued to see coming out of 1 Herald Plaza the last few years, with enough bad decisions having emerged to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to your remaining Broward readers that you all consider Broward to not just be terra incognita, but almost persona non grata as well, given how Broward barely exists at all in your blogs, too, regardless of the subject area.


To my eyes, among the worst and most unforgivable sins for a media enterprise that still contends that they're RELEVANT now is how week-after-week, month-after-month, NOT a single instance of an article, column or essay written by a Miami Herald employee -or even a Guest Op-Ed- will appear in that embarrassing excuse for a Sunday public policy section, Issues & Ideas, that directly concerns issues, people, pols, government and personalities of and in Broward County.
Month-after-month-after month!


The self-evident facts, the actual newspaper itself, don't lie, and they could hardly be more
glaring or damaging to the newspaper's faltering credibility.


Here we are at the end of the year 2011 and there is NOT a single Broward-oriented columnist appearing in print in your newspaper.
How can you possibly think that's a good idea?


As for your decision to go seven-plus months without an official Reader's Ombudsman, since
Edward Schumacher-Matos left for NPR, and the curious management decision to NOT
replace him, well, there's yet another completely counter-intuitive journalism decision that
further shows the newspaper's lack of seriousness and integrity.
But hey, who's counting all those curious decisions, right?


I mean there's only... well, now that you mention it:


-the longstanding lack of even one South Florida-based conservative columnist with both some historical knowledge of the area and some flair & verve in their writing that could challenge the stagnant South Florida status quo to readers 2-3 times a week


-the complete lack of an Education blog in the year 2011


-the Editorial Board's abject failure to consistently run meaningful well-written dissenting
points-of view in your so-called "Opposing Views," as you instead prefer running columns
and essays that merely replicate the prevailing status quo orthodoxy of the Editorial Board,
even to the point of running crummy columns by Mary Sanchez of the Kansas City Star that sound eerily like Herald editorials.
But she's even more condescending and patronizing, if that's possible; and she proves it
whenever you deign to put her words into print.


To most reasonable people, Mr. Landsberg, calling something Opposing Views conjures
up a mental image of an actual opposing point-of-view, not merely uttering the same exact
ideological nostrums or cant with someone else's name attached to them.
It's the difference between a voice and a chorus.
A more accurate name for the top of that editorial page in the Herald now would be "The Choir." 


And lest you forget, as we approach 2012, there is NOT a single Broward-oriented blog on the Herald's entire website.
Pitiful!


That said, you sure have managed to corner the market to yourself on useless minutiae on
Cuba, or writing sycophantic stories about commercial and residential real estate 'upturns'
in downtown Miami.
I will give you credit for that, if that's what it is.


At some point in the next few weeks, you might want to avail yourself of a blog post I wrote
on November 27th of last year that connects-the-dots rather well on what I and many other 
well-informed and civic-minded residents of Broward County continue to see as your and the Herald's failings.


How a video of Paramore in Stockholm & Razorlight in London proves the Miami Herald is too damn slow. Iceberg dead ahead!
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/how-video-of-paramore-in-stockholm.html


It's just one of many posts on the decline we've all seen at the Herald, and in particular, your perfectly awful news coverage of Broward County.
I don't know whether you plan on making any meaningful, positive changes to the newspaper and website in the new year or not as part of some collective New Year's resolutions, but if you aren't, you're making a huge mistake.To quote myself from that post:
When specifically is Miami Herald publisher David Landsberg finally going to publicly share with Herald readers what his actual plan is to rescue the newspaper, and make it relevant to readers and news consumers, which it increasingly is NOT by any stretch of the imagination?  It's getting kind of late in the voyage with Landsberg at the helm, and while I'm no expert on icebergs, I can see with my own eyes that the known and unknown icebergs keep getting closer and closer to the Herald's bow as it steers into unchartered waters without a compass or, seemingly, a legitimate plan to get to its destination.  And like you all, I know with absolute certainty that most of an iceberg is unseen -and below the surface.Just like the Herald's myriad problems.But some problems are too big to hide.
Continuing to routinely treat so many of a newspaper's readers with profound condescension and almost child-like indifference is the sort of thing that at other newspapers would quickly get people fired, but is something which at the Miami Herald is simply called business-as-usual or, Sunday.


You can either change that or you can just ignore that.
We'll all see in January which choice you made.


-----


In my original email to Mr. Landsberg on Friday, I made a small mistake.
I called the column on the page opposite the Herald editorial page that, rather than being contrary to the Herald Editorial Board's position as you'd think, based on what they call it, it's usually complementary, "Opposing Voices." 
It's actually called "Opposing Views."


Regardless of what the Herald calls it, the point is not just valid, but still just as sheepishly embarrassing as well.


For those of you who are new to this blog and have never seen it before, when I first started my South Beach Hoosier blog and Hallandale Beach Blog in 2007, I made a conscious point of posting the following as an anchor to the blog -something that would always be present- so that anyone coming to them would know precisely where I stood on the issue of the Herald and its faltering news coverage of South Florida and fleeting influence within it.
I mention this because there are a lot of people in the blogosphere who are Miami Herald sycophants, from whom "seldom is heard a discouraging word..."


The following is what was on South Beach Hoosier in 2008 and 100% accurate at the time it was written, though many changes have taken place since then -just not enough positive ones for South Florida residents who want more 'hard news' coverage in their newspapers more often -everyday.


I hope it provides some helpful context for understanding what I wrote in Part 1 above and
what you'll soon see here in Part 2.


-----



South Beach Hoosier will also examine the latest amusing or not-so-amusing scandals, cover-ups, controversies, contretemps and mis-adventures bedeviling South Florida, something I became used to while growing up in North Miami Beach in the late 1960's and the 70's.
Fortunately, because of my news-junkie DNA and myriad magazine subscriptions, and long-standing relationships with media types in Miami, I was able to keep up pretty well with the South Florida area while living in Bloomington, Chicago, Evanston, Wilmette and Washington, D.C./Arlington, VA.
Communities where sensible civic activism and high standards of journalism were the norm and not the exception.


Due to my own personal/business/political interests and experiences in those cities, as well as my good fortune to have a large number of well-informed and well-connected friends and former housemates while living there, many but not all of whom are or were reporters, columnists, editors, TV/film producers, along with a few who are now well-placed in Statehouses and legal circles across the country, I'll have a deep bench of facts, opinions, point-of-views and fact-checkers to work with. 
That's the goal for South Beach Hoosier.


It's my hope that this'll help me offer up pinpoint criticism, whether of national and South Florida pols, media organizations and sports or show biz personalities, that have heretofore evaded public scrutiny, transparency or accountability -as well as well-aimed brickbats. 
To examine the proverbial case of the latest dog that doesn't bark, or analyze why the latest case of media conventional wisdom has -again- been proven wrong, and why.


This is especially true of The Miami Herald, the morning newspaper I grew-up with and have suffered with since first leaving North Miami Beach for Bloomington in the Fall of '79, as its most talented people jumped ship and the paper become evermore a shell of what it once was: an excellent newspaper with talented and respected reporters and editors telling compelling and intriguing stories of intrinsic value to its readers throughout polyglot and transient South Florida. 


Television news-wise, when I'd return to South Florida from school or work in Bloomington, Evanston, and DC, whether for Christmas vacation, Baltimore Oriole spring training games or visits for weddings, I could still see that Miami had the kind of scrappy and innately curious reporters who make a tangible difference in a community.
The sorts of enterprising reporters that so many of my friends at Ernie Pyle at IU, and Medill at Northwestern were already well on their way to becoming. 


http://www.idsnews.com/
http://journalism.indiana.edu/news/erniepyle/  
http://www.dailynorthwestern.com/
http://www.medill.northwestern.edu/ 


Reporters who might have the talent and ability to convey to the waves of newcomers and visitors to the area, a nuanced sense of South Florida's decidedly mixed historical past, by writing with the proper amount of factual research, balanced perspective and sense of disbelief, to describe the events unfolding around them. 
Then, ending the piece by dropping the hammer on whichever local corrupt/incompetent miscreant, pol or agency hack was the target of their ire, for attempting to perpetrate yet another in a long of of dubious acts against the people of South Florida.


Sadly for the people of South Florida, things have gotten so bad now that The Herald's numerous flaws are as much for what they don't publish, as much as for the self-evident mediocre quality of its writing and reporting, lack of thorough fact-checking, and inadequate search for conflicts of interest.
For all the talk of improving the paper by the new McClatchy management, it shows no tangible signs of changing for the better any time soon, a great disappointment to its readers.


It's common knowledge within the industry that The Herald's website is a joke compared to the efforts of many smaller circulation newspapers. www.miamiherald.com


Frankly, the website itself remains a constant source of embarrassment for Herald reporters and columnists, who are constantly besieged by readers and told yet another horror story about not being able to find recent Herald stories that should be on the paper's website but aren't.
The reporters can do little more than shrug their shoulders in response.


Even in the year 2008, The Herald still DOESN'T have a permanent Public Ombudsman to represent the interests of both its readers and basic fairness, like many newspapers with much smaller circulation numbers!
Meanwhile, with much more to fear and lose, The New York Times has an independent Public Editor, currently Clark Hoyt, who weekly takes the Times' policy, owners, editors, reporters and columnists to task publicly, even providing links back to the original story or column in question, unlike the once-in-a-while effort at the Herald. 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/thepubliceditor/index.html?8qa


Meanwhile The Herald's Sunday attempt at high-minded opinion-shaping and public policy, Issues & Ideas, is so embarrassing and muddled on so many different levels that it's all one can do to not laugh from crying, so feeble is its effort, so low is its aim, so puny the actual result.


Yet rather than seeking the creative input of bright and knowledgeable new faces who are familiar with the real problems of South Florida, The Herald still regularly farms-out the Guest Op-Ed space in the paper on Saturday to people living outside of the area, more than any other newspaper in America I've ever read. They continually run long excerpts in their editorial space from parochial interest groups whose political sentiments echo that of the the Herald's own Editorial Board. 


Even worse, if possible, in many cases these particular guest editorial tangents have already appeared in other forums or publications! And speaking of the Herald's Editorial Board, who's on that exactly, anyway?


It's a great mystery that nobody seems able to fully explain away, yet The New York Times, under the guidance of Andy Rosenthal, has an entire webpage specifically devoted to detailing the background and credentials of its Editorial Board. http://www.nytimes.com/ref/opinion/editorial-board.html


Hmmm... call me old-fashioned, but South Beach Hoosier prefers transparency!

-----


By the way, as I write this post on early Wednesday morning, it's now been exactly a week since the Broward County Commission vote on redistricting and the Herald has STILL NOT published anything in print or online.


Part 2, my follow-up email to the above, will be here soon.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, November 27, 2010

How a video of Paramore in Stockholm & Razorlight in London proves the Miami Herald is too damn slow. Iceberg dead ahead!



Paramore -Misguided Ghosts, LIVE in Stockholm, acoustic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9OuNtlXiGA

How a video of Paramore in Stockholm and Razorlight at the Cuckoo Club, London proves the Miami Herald is moving too damn slow in its news coverage.
Iceberg dead ahead!

A number of months ago -I want to say it was mid-April- when I wanted to prove a few Linkpoints about how poorly the Miami Herald was serving their increasingly smaller number of subscribers and readers -esp. the Sports Dept., led by their editor, Jorge Rojas- part of my grand plan was to run photos of what they ran in the newspaper on Saturday and compare that to what other East Coast newspapers ran that same day, since it's the same time zone.

The point, obviously, was to skewer the Herald once again thru some easily-understood and
rather self-evident anecdotal evidence to demonstrate that their conscious decision to send copies of the newspaper to next door Broward County where I live -in my case, right next to Aventura, only 14 miles due north of the newspaper's HQ on Biscayne Bay in Miami- which contained old news, lots of Wire stories and less local locally-written stories with important context, was only making their well-known problems MUCH WORSE

This is most easily demonstrated when you don't see complete sports stories and scores the next day -or timely election result updates on the website.

Some examples of this from this past year:

Wednesday, November 3, 2010
The Miami Herald's dismal Pony Express-style coverage of The World Series -compared to the New York Times- is a bad omen for readers
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/miami-heralds-dismal-pony-express-style.html

Thursday, September 2, 2010
Breaking: Miami Herald & sports editor Jorge Rojas already in mid-season form as they ignore BigTenNetwork's televised ballgames
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/breaking-miami-herald-sports-editor.html

Saturday, August 28, 2010
Miami Herald is channeling Pony Express in its reporting on Broward School Board elections from four days ago. But it's the year 2010!
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/miami-herald-is-channeling-pony-express.html

 Saturday, April 24, 2010
UCLA edges Sooners to win 2010 NCAA Women's Gymnastics Championship at Gainesville; Coverage of Women's Sports in the Miami Herald
http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/ucla-edges-sooners-to-win-2010-ncaa.html

Monday, January 4, 2010
A TV program we can use more of over here: "Jag ska bli stjärna"; Girls sports in South Florida and the abysmal media coverage of it

http://hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/tv-program-we-can-use-more-of-over-here.html

As you can see from above, in the interim, I've run a few pieces here and there demonstrating that central uncontested fact about the Herald's declining quality to a fair-thee-well, using both the coverage of the second NCAA D1 Womens Basketball Semifinal game, and Game Two of the 2010 World Series, Texas Rangers at San Francisco Giants, the latter of which started before 8:30 p.m. Eastern.

At the time, the other part of my plan was to show that despite all the technological innovations of the past 15 years that allow legacy media companies like McClatchy's Miami Herald, as well as bloggers like myself, to share and post information quickly, the Herald was "moving kinda slow" -like Uncle Joe in front of the Shady Rest Hotel in Petticoat Junction- to the absolute detriment of everyone concerned, most notably, news consumers.

One of the ways that I was going to do that was to post a great video of Paramore performing in Stockholm late on a Friday night/early Saturday morning, that had been recorded and posted to YouTube, and which later in the early A.M., was sent to me by a friend in Stockholm who'd been at the concert, and was so wired that she literally couldn't immediately fall asleep.

Naturally, like millions of other people, unable to fall asleep, she promptly started checking her email and surfing the Web.

In her version of the story, after reading my humble blog here for the first time in a few days, and sending me a note about some things she liked and some constructive suggestions, intent on going to sleep but wanting to check one last time, she typed in Paramore on YouTube, assuming that it was unlikely that anyone at the concert had uploaded something yet.

But she was wrong.
Somebody had!

At the top of this blog post is a better quality version of the original video that I saw, but you still get the point nonetheless.
Technology and social media allow news, ideas and information to flow freely from all sorts of places.
So why is the Herald so laggard at doing the basics, like timely reporting?

Why are they consciously turning their back on covering local government in South Florida and losing what precious remaining credibility they maintain?

When I woke up that Saturday morning in April, the newspaper lacked what I and many other news junkies or sports fans would consider some basic information, yet my email inbox was ALREADY full of interesting news, including that hours-old video that was still PIPING FRESH!

Since I didn't post that back then when I was of a mind to, I'll do it now, and further buttress my point by posting here yet another video that proves the point.

Blogger extraordinaire Josefina Boston of AbsolutBoston blog fame, and Escada's London HQ, http://absolutboston.se/ shot some interesting video when she and her beautiful model pal Tess Montgomery went over to the Cuckoo Club in Mayfair.
That is, they did so after they and two other fashion-forward friends hit the opening of the new Dior store on Bond Street, where the champagne was really flowing.
http://absolutboston.se/dior-opening-party/

While there for the Cuckoo Club's second anniversary, Josefina filmed this performance by Razorlight from very close-up.



Razorlight playing LIVE at The Cuckoo Club, Mayfair, London
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCCWY_xL33w

Josefina blogs for the very popular Spotlife blogging platform, http://spotlife.se/ as does the lovely Tess Montgomery, who, in my opinion, looks like a taller, sexier Julie Delpy.
Linkhttp://www.motmodel.com/models/detail.asp?model_id=3991

Not that there's anything wrong with the regular-sized one! http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000365/

Tess blogs from http://tessm.se/, where she has even more photos of Razorlight performing at http://tessm.se/cuckoo-club-2-ar/ as well as some photos of the Dior event at http://tessm.se/dior-event-pa-bond-street/
 Bon Chic, Bon Genre!

Tess even has some good sound advice that's especially practical at this time of the year when she says at one point in her post, "Jag har nämligen som regel att aldrig blanda shopping och alkohol."
Which is to say that she's developed a rule about never mixing shopping with alcohol.

That's clearly a lesson that's yet to take hold of many area women, since I often see them over at the Aventura Mall around 6:30 p.m.or so, as they go straight from drinking with their gal pals to shopping, usually over at Nordstrom's.
http://about.nordstrom.com/MapPoint/MapResults.aspx?bizid=774

I can't help but think that Tess probably has a good story behind that rule, too, just like Jethro Gibbs of longtime Hallandale Beach Blog fave NCIS has for his rules.
http://ncis.wikia.com/wiki/Leroy_Jethro_Gibbs/Rules

So, getting back to the Herald, I know when I look at the Saturday newspaper tomorrow and it's ponderous website that is both too-busy and yet NOT full enough of legitimate news stories, I will see so-called "news" that's largely been pre-chewed or eaten with all the turkey leftovers on Friday, on what is traditionally one of the worst weekends for news stories because the varsity news team is away on vacation.

When specifically is Miami Herald publisher David Landsberg finally going to publicly share with Herald readers what his actual plan is to rescue the newspaper, and make it relevant to readers and news consumers, which it increasingly is NOT by any stretch of the imagination?

It's getting kind of late in the voyage with Landsberg at the helm, and while I'm no expert on icebergs, I can see with my own eyes that the known and unknown icebergs keep getting closer and closer to the Herald's bow as it steers into unchartered waters without a compass or, seemingly, a legitimate plan to get to its destination.

And like you all, I know with absolute certainty that most of an iceberg is unseen -and below the surface.
Just like the Herald's myriad problems.
But some problems are too big to hide.

 -----


Paramore: Sweden Photoshoot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbKIFZY3q9M


Paramore - Decode, Ulalume Festival
http://www.mtv.com/videos/?id=1623823

More Paramore interviews and goodies at
http://www.mtv.com/music/artist/paramore/artist.jhtml

Paramore's official website: http://www.paramore.net/


See also: http://stureplan.se/bloggar
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)