Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Newt Gingrich plays hardball, tells truth, electrifies South Carolina GOP debate re education policy, govt. benefits, war on terrorism, Pakistan; the post-debate spin on Sean Hannity Show


Newt Gingrich campaign video: Newt on Education: Return Power to Parents. January 17, 2012. http://youtu.be/6Gc-x-tZ2bQ



Newt Gingrich campaign video: Newt: "99 Weeks is an Associate Degree". January 17, 2012. http://youtu.be/2Xr72U1jdtE



Newt Gingrich campaign video: Newt Gingrich to Juan Williams: Americans Want Paychecks, Not Government Food Stamps. January 17, 2012. 
http://youtu.be/4c1-22w2G7M



Newt Gingrich campaign video: Newt Plan for America's Enemies: Kill Them. January 17, 2011. http://youtu.be/50WYM-1SjQQ



Newt Gingrich campaign video: Newt Gingrich's appearance on Fox News Channel's Sean Hannity Show after the debate. January 17, 2012.
http://youtu.be/NTDP5-7OTj4


All videos are from the January 16, 2012 Republican Presidential debate held at North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina sponsored by Fox News Channel, The Wall Street Journal and the South Carolina Republican Party.





National Journal: Newt Gingrich on Mitt Romney: Why Nominate a Loser?, January 16, 2012. http://bcove.me/afa4zld8


National Journal
CAMPAIGN 2012
Gingrich on Romney: Why Nominate a Loser?
Former speaker says past defeats show Romney, Santorum are unelectable
By Sarah Huisenga
Updated: January 17, 2012 | 1:03 p.m.
January 16, 2012 | 5:32 p.m.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/gingrich-on-romney-why-nominate-a-loser--20120116


The Florida GOP Presidential primary is two weeks from today and I will be voting for Newt Gingrich.
I received my new voter's registration card in the mail on Saturday, exactly eleven days after visiting the Broward Supervisor of Elections HQ in Ft. Lauderdale to do the paperwork to change my party registration. 


-----
More information on Newt Gingrich at:

http://www.newt.org/


http://www.youtube.com/user/ngingrich


http://twitter.com/newtgingrich 

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Cold Reality of the Sunshine State: Romney has won 2 small states whose total # of votes cast were less than # of absentee ballots requested in Florida -for an election in 3 weeks!; Romney's glass jaw



Newt Gingrich 2012 campaign video: On Bain Capital: It's a Question of Character, Not Capitalism. January 11, 2012. http://youtu.be/yV6qUI5-ij4


Above, audio of Newt Gingrich's appearance this afternoon on Sean Hannity's nationally-syndicated radio show, where he discussed Mitt Romney's track record with Bain Capital. He's rightly frustrated and at pains to explain the subtle yet important distinction of his having asked hard questions and demanded answers about what Romney actually did for the company, not Gingrich's questioning of the free enterprise system.


Unfortunately, among others, the Mainstream Media's punditocracy of the Left and the Right seem perfectly willing to ignore the clear distinction. 


Even worse for well-informed voters who want someone who will really take the fight to President Obama and make him the focal point of the campaign, that large group ignoring the distinction also includes the sycophantic Republican Party 'Establishment' based in the Beltway and in the state capitols, who favor political coronations, not hard-fought floor fights on public policy issues.


(To figure out who these particular GOP characters are, just picture John Sununu and his small-minded ilk taking up space in the Bush 41 White House, James Baker's State Dept., and carious agencies. Then, think of their many, many younger Gray Flannel suit-wearing underlings, who since then have either made it to Congress or became prominent in D.C. not by solving problems creatively, but rather by promising to finesse people they already know in exchange for money. Yes, lots and lots of smart but philosophically weak and outside-the-box averse guys. As it happens, to be honest, often the type of guys my then-girlfriends had broken-up with in order to be with me. 
The sort of well-educated but oblivious people who in the early Nineties often seemed more afraid of the fact that their whole worldview had been tossed upside-down by the fall of the Berlin Wall, and who DIDN'T want to recognize the bravery of the people in Eastern Europe and reward it by recognizing their independence, but who preferred instead that it stay in the Soviet sphere because that way they didn't have to think about it. 
Brent Scowcroft-types. 
These are THE people whom I most loathed of any I dealt with in the 15 years I lived and worked in Washington. And there are still lots of them who haven't learned a single lesson in twenty years.)


It's the same reason that the GOP establishment was so deathly afraid of the armies of retired accountants, military vets, college students and Libertarian-oriented school teachers interested in financial solvency in Washington who were the vanguard of the Tea Party movement -there was nothing they could offer to appease them.
They didn't want something in return, they wanted concrete results in Congress.


Romney's hyper-sensitive and completely calculated "How dare you criticize free enterprise..." response to Gingrich's probing questions, when that's NOT what's at issue, is also mentioned as part of the larger problem with Romney.


Not just that he is thin-skinned regarding constructive criticism of his own record, per se, but as many surmise, Romney's chiseled jaw is, in fact, a glass jaw.
One that Obama's minions will start jabbing and punching at long before the GOP convention if Romney wins.
Think Chuck Wepner in the 1975 Ali fight.


In short, Romney is being criticized on the specifics of what HE did in specific situations when he was in charge. 
Period


His ability -or inability- to make principled decisions and stick by them is exactly what's being criticized, and his own track record, post-Salt Lake City Olympics, is why that is such a mother lode.   




Newt Gingrich 2012 campaign video: For the dogs. January 11, 2012.
http://youtu.be/x-4bm5NxqPY


Cold Reality of the Sunshine State: Mitt Romney has won two small states whose total # of votes cast were less than the # of absentee ballots already requested by voters in Florida... for an election three weeks from last night.


I had actually heard speculation about the way these numbers would probably sort themselves out last week -ironically, while I was on my way to the Supervisor of Elections office in Broward County HQ's in Ft. Lauderdale- but nothing has changed to make them inaccurate.


If anything, the contrast in numbers will only get exponentially larger, something that national reporters, columnists and anchors will find themselves unable to resist mentioning -over and over again- when Romney supporters crow about what sort of "mandate" they have.
Just saying...


Orlando Sentinel
Central Florida Political Pulse blog 
RPOF: Florida absentee ballot requests now more than Iowa, NH vote totals 
2012 Florida presidential primary, 2012 presidential election — posted by scottpowers on January, 10 2012 11:17 AM
Absentee ballot requests in Florida now are double the total sought for the 2008 presidential primary and are more than all the votes cast in
Iowa and expected today in New Hampshire.
That’s the word from the Republican Party of Florida, which argues there is no voter enthusiasm gap this year.
Read the rest of the post at: http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_politics/2012/01/rpof-florida-absentee-ballot-requests-now-more-than-iowa-nh-vote-totals.html


-----
http://www.newt.org/


http://www.youtube.com/user/ngingrich

Monday, January 9, 2012

Pow! Former Dem. congressman Artur Davis of Alabama slices-and-dices, marinates and sautés the N.Y. Times' Andy Rosenthal in the National Review Online. Delicious!

Pow! Former Dem. congressman Artur Davis of Alabama slices-and-dices, marinates and sautés the N.Y. Times' Andy Rosenthal in the National Review Online. Delicious!
But first, the necessary predicate, which I sent some of you the day it appeared in The Post:


The Washington Post
The Fix blog
Former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis talks party-switching
Posted by Aaron Blake at 03:18 PM ET, 12/30/2011
Former Democratic congressman Artur Davis, who has been a thorn in the side of Democrats in the aftermath of his loss in the 2010 Alabama gubernatorial primary, is a man without a political party.
In an interview with The Fix, Davis openly speculated about running for office as an independent or even a Republican. In both cases, he suggested his decision not to make the switch has as much to do with the difficulties involved as any desire he has to remain a Democrat.
Read the rest of the post at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/former-democratic-rep-artur-davis-talks-party-switching/2011/12/30/gIQAmOKyQP_blog.html


Reader comments at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/former-democratic-rep-artur-davis-talks-party-switching/2011/12/30/gIQAmOKyQP_blog.html


NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE
Rosenthal’s Amnesia 
The Times columnist forgets how protesters treated LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Bush, . . .
By Artur Davis
January 9, 2012 4:00 A.M.
Lyndon Johnson was loathed enough that, in his final year in office, he dared not make a public appearance other than at a military base; it was commonplace for chanting crowds to gather and spray verbal obscenities at LBJ’s White House. Jimmy Carter’s presidency was a routine subject of cultural derision, some of it viciously aimed at his pre-teen daughter and his brother. Bill Clinton spawned so much hate that at least some of his adversaries spread strange rumors that he was connected to murder; then there was this thing called impeachment. George W. Bush inflamed some of his enemies enough that they carried signs crudely depicting him as a war criminal or a Hitler clone.
I mention all these instances of ugliness directed at presidents because they are apparently unknown to Andrew Rosenthal, a New York Times columnist, who caused a stir last week by implying that strident opposition to Barack Obama is racially motivated, and that it’s all part of a racist tide building in advance of the November elections.
Read the rest of the essay at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/287536/rosenthal-s-amnesia-artur-davis 


In case you forgot who ran that race-based ad campaign against Bobby Jindal in 2003 that's mentioned in the article above, it was Kathleen Babineaux Blanco.


POLITICO
Artur Davis: From Dem star to exile
By: Alex Isenstadt
December 1, 2011 11:37 PM EST
The future once seemed limitless for Artur Davis.
Not so long ago, he was viewed as one of the Democratic Party’s rising stars, routinely evoking comparisons to Barack Obama. A smart, ambitious Harvard Law School graduate like Obama, Davis appeared to be on a trajectory to make history as Alabama’s first black governor. Some saw the youthful congressman as a future attorney general.
Today, all that is gone.
Read the rest of the post at:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69578.html


Reader comments at:
http://dyn.politico.com/members/forums/thread.cfm?catid=1&subcatid=1&threadid=6210856


Anyone who's well-read, with a lick of common sense and possessed of an open mind, and who has spent any serious amount of time living and working in the Washington, D.C. area, knows almost from osmosis that nobody-but-nobody is EVER more popular with the ranks of the Beltway's permanent Democratic-leaning Mainstream Media than a Republican former insider or power-broker who says positive things about the Democratic Party's policies, or, who attacks another prominent Republican, the better-known the better.


This explains the recent phenomena the past three months of appearances on U.S. network TV and the cablenets by former GOP House members, staffers and party officials from the 1990's, many of whom had completely fallen off the MSM's radar, so long as they have something negative to say about Newt Gingrich, even if they owe their own rise from complete obscurity to prominence to Newt.
(That is, if you believe that nobody from Romney's PAC was involved in any way with coordinating this shopping of these anti-Newt/pro-Republican establishment types to make it easier for the MSM to find them.)


Conversely, nobody is ever treated more like a leper by the MSM than a Democrat who decides -whether out of an overabundance of backbone, bluster, spite or some other reason- to pop-open the hood of the post-Clinton Democratic Party and take a hard look at the role of their pals in the race-identity politics movement and SEIU by performing a LIVE autopsy.
Nobody wants to see under the hood and see the meat being made.



Fox News video: Daily Caller reporter Michelle Fields discusses proposed voter ID laws and former AL congressman Artur Davis says via videotape that he believes voter fraud is more present in the absentee ballot process than it is at the actual voting booth, and relates the experience in Alabama. 

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Iowa Caucus-apalooza is tonight, and as 80% reject Romney & Paul, GOP strategists work on Obama's biggest flaw: his own words and his OWN failure to deliver on his lofty rhetoric



First in the Nation: The Iowa Caucuses
http://youtu.be/Da2xVjBiNjQ

That sound you'll be hearing in the distance all across the country later today, around 12 Noon Eastern, is the sound of millions of people turning on their radios to hear what Rush Limbaugh has to say about what is and is NOT going on in the hours leading up to tonight's Iowa GOP presidential caucus.


Townhall.com

Why 80% Reject Paul and Romney
By Kevin McCullough
1/1/2012
Dear Iowa Caucus participants,
You have been told for the better part of year now who it is that you must choose. Beltway insiders have insisted upon thrusting establishment candidates upon you. Libertarian anarchists have swopped into your state shouting that you must support Ron Paul, while toking on the marijuana they soon believe President Paul will make legal.
Read the rest of the post at:
http://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2012/01/01/why_80_reject_paul_and_romney





Rush: Establishment "Afraid Newt Might Win," Because Their "Hearts Are Set on Romney"
http://youtu.be/pIOPvSKSk0o





Art Laffer: Gingrich Has Done It Before, Has Best Economic Plan



New York Times
As Gingrich Reels From Attack Ads, Some Aides Suggest Fighting Back
By Trip Gabriel
Published: December 30, 2011
DES MOINES — Alarmed by Newt Gingrich’s decline in the polls in the face of a fusillade of negative advertisements, some senior aides and grass-roots supporters have suggested that he reverse course and fight fire with fire, fearing for the future of his candidacy if he does not.
Mr. Gingrich’s vow to stay positive draws applause at every stop of his winding Iowa bus tour, but polls raise questions about that strategy as attack ads against him from his opponents’ campaigns and independent groups have seeped into voters’ minds.
Read the rest of the article at:


PBS video: Washington Week: On the Trail: The Iowa Caucuses, December 29, 2011.
http://youtu.be/dOq95QNbPIc

New York Times
Group’s Ads Rip at Gingrich as Romney Stands Clear
Restore Our Future has spent close to $3 million in Iowa alone.
By Nicholas Confessore and Jim Rutenberg
Published: December 30, 2011
DES MOINES — The attacks began three weeks ago and have not let up since: Television ad after television ad slamming Newt Gingrich for having “more baggage than the airlines,” for being fined by Congress for ethics violations, for his position on illegal immigration, even for admitting that he has made mistakes on the campaign trail.
Democrats and Republicans alike have singled out the $2.8 million-and-counting air deluge as the biggest factor in Mr. Gingrich’s precipitous drop in polls of Iowa voters and Mitt Romney’s corresponding rise, reshaping the critical first contest of the Republican primary season to Mr. Romney’s benefit.
Read the rest of the article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/us/politics/restore-our-future-attack-ads-harm-gingrich-in-iowa.html


The Washington Post
GOP’s election battle plan: Use Obama’s own words against him
By Peter Wallsten
Published: January 1, 2012
With Republican voters in Iowa set to finally begin picking a nominee to challenge President Obama, GOP officials in Washington are quietly and methodically finishing what operatives are calling “the book” — 500 pages of Obama quotes and video links that will form the backbone of the party’s attack strategy against the president leading up to Election Day 2012.
The document, portions of which were reviewed by The Washington Post, lays out how GOP officials plan to use Obama’s words and voice as they build an argument for his defeat: that he made specific promises and entered office with lofty expectations and has failed to deliver on both.
Read the rest of the article at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gops-battle-plan-against-obama-use-his-own-words-against-him/2011/12/30/gIQA7ZrPUP_story.html




http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/rss/politics/campaigns


http://www.youtube.com/user/ngingrich


http://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Florida voters shake their heads in wonder as Tampa Bay Times continues flogging their stories re their poll of "political insiders" -favoring incumbents in 2012. Surprise!


Florida voters shake their heads in wonder as Tampa Bay Times continues flogging their stories re their poll of "political insiders" -favoring incumbents in 2012. Surprise!



Political insiders say Sen. Bill Nelson likely to win third term
By Adam C. Smith, Times Political Editor
In Print: Sunday, December 25, 2011

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/political-insiders-say-sen-bill-nelson-likely-to-win-third-term/1207786

It's like a poll of national sports writers in Miami in the days before Super Bowl III that overwhelmingly favored the Baltimore Colts over the New York Jets, the Georgetown Hoyas over the Villanova Wildcats in the 1985 NCAA basketball tourney.
And how did you like last season's World Series between the Red Sox and the Phillies, the pre-ordained classic that never was?
Who actually had the Packers over the Steelers in the Super Bowl before the 2010 season started?
(You'll recall that my prediction before the game was spot-on.)

Dear reader of the blog, whose attention and time at this first post of the year I appreciate, please tell me when since 9/11 has there ever been a poll of elites and insiders in this country or this state or this county where the unexpected was accurately predicted?
Even when there were plenty of signs that something unexpected could well happen?
Precisely.

The sports analogy is nationally-known print sports writers and TV reporters appearing on nationally-syndicated sports talk radio shows of the sort that I have been listening to since I was a kid in the 1970's -just like I did with Tony Kornheiser's Washington, D.C.  radio program for WTEM-AM in the '90's before he was at ESPN- listening to them opine on the NCAA basketball tourney selections in the days before the tourney starts.


They're clearly eager to hear guests offering insight into possible upcoming upsets for the benefit of their listeners or viewers, but almost invariably, the host or co-hosts then ignore everything that's been said, heard and seen -and history- by then picking nothing but 'chalk,' i.e. picking nothing but the top-seeded teams.


Yes, despite every one's always saying that they want something unexpected, look what happens when "experts" are asked and results have consequences?

That's a pretty common 'phenomena' in contemporary U.S. sports media that you rarely hear anyone discuss or criticize, and it's political counterpart is equally common at almost every national and Florida-based newspaper and media website worth perusing, even the good ones.


It's a real buzz-kill, and in my opinion is one of the main reasons that few big political movements happen down here as spontaneously as they do in other parts of the country -the news media here really isn't interested in change, and cover and report accordingly, rather than let the narrative and natural ebb-and flow of events tell the tale.


This explains, in part, why the national news media write as if they would like Newt Gingrich to be finished after the Iowa Caucus this coming week, despite all the larger states he leads in, like Florida, for instance, despite less resources than Mitt Romney.

In short, the news media really doesn't want change, they just want the pretense that change could happen, which is why the voters who DO want big change are so frustrated by the news media's bias.
It's not just a political bias on the part of some reporters, though it IS that, but also a bias towards what they already know, understand and can explain, which is why so much political reporting is derivative to a nauseating degree.

That's another reason I'm in favor of having an election system like Louisiana's, where all the candidates run together and the general election is between the top two finishers, regardless of party affiliation.
(I know there's a name for this system but I'm too tired to think of the name of it.)

Now THAT would be fun and reward the voters with an election worth watching and get more sensible people in office, and be a handy tool for dealing with gerrymandering.
Imagine what gerrymandered districts would be like in South Florida under a system like this -less extremism of the left or right.


Florida voters across the state that I've been in touch with since this most recent post on the insider's poll continue to shake their heads in wonder as the old St. Petersburg Times and their reporters and columnists continue flogging a series of stories with a never-ending story-line about their poll of "political insiders" favoring incumbents in 2012.
Really?
Imagine that?

Of course they do!
And so do the state's print and electronic media thru their mostly bad and superficial coverage, too!
Which, of course, is part of the problem, no? 

The very same elites, "insiders" and news media that thought they would have Tea Party favorite Marco Rubio to play with -like a cat's toy- for a few months, with Rubio playing the role of well-chewed rubber mouse?


After all, hadn't these same forces already publicly proclaimed Charlie Crist a political genius, month-after-month, for 'splitting the difference,' despite the lack of any empirical evidence that held up to serious scrutiny, that he had fundamentally changed the broken and much-loathed political culture of Tallahassee, south Georgia's anti-Mayberry?
Yes.

Evidence, who needs tangible evidence that anything was changing for the better in Tallahassee when the state's news media was in love the way the Florida news media was in
full-thrall to Charlie Crist and his affable white hair in 2009 and early 2010?

Yes, Florida, the Sunshine State, where the then-formerly popular governor Crist lost that Senate GOP primary that the Sunshine State's Mainstream Media and political elites had considered a mere formality, having already been writing newspaper stories/columns and filing TV stories for months that took the position that he was "inevitable."


So "inevitable," in fact, that the state's news media actually started filing stories on whether Crist might soon be a GOP VP candidate, a pseudo-fact that because it was printed in Florida newspapers so often, started appearing more frequently in DC-based media, blogs and websites as well, where they didn't know any better.
(The Beltway pundits assumed the reporters here in Florida must know what they were talking about, and had some sources who knew it was true.)

And all of this MONTHS before the formality of an actual election
After all, the MSM and political elites would know, wouldn't they, they're "experts"?


And besides, as they were always keen on reminding us, Florida is SO important.
Except when it's not.
But they were 100% wrong and Marco Rubio trounced Crist in the GOP primary.

And then, not willing to accept the mandate of the people, the elites of both parties and many columnists and editorial boards decided that Crist should be given yet another chance to win, not just one, so millions were given to him by the comfortable status quo-types who reminded us over-and-over that despite his loss to Rubio, Crist was still the best candidate.

Then in November, Rubio trounced Crist for yet a second time, and made hapless Democratic Party nominee Kendrick Meek a third-place finisher in a three-way race, and a very bad third place at that.

Yes, Florida, the same state where the only statewide-elected Democrat in the FL Cabinet,
a multi-millionaire, former banking executive and longtime Democratic insider who was married to a wealthy attorney and former Democratic gubernatorial nominee, lost the gubernatorial race to a wealthy businessman who had never run for elective office before.


Losing in some part because she never did the one thing that all good elected officials must do -explain who they are, what they've done, what they are in favor of and against and why.
That is a necessity.


But Alex Sink and her political advisers and the Democratic Party, esp. the most liberal wind of that shrinking party, took all that for granted, as did most of the state's news media.

But finally someone started noticing what I had seen from the beginning -that she really was running for office in the worst possible way.
By late August and early September, reports started appearing in newspapers -but not on Miami-area TV- that her campaign had been done such a poor job of laying the groundwork explaining who she was and her stand on issues, that, surprise, there were still many voters who did not know that Alex Sink was a woman.

When you are running for governor of the fourth largest state in the country and three months before the general election, a sizable number of likely voters don't know what sex you are, you are poised for a bruising losing effort.
And that was when Rick Scott's TV campaign started in earnest of defining the woman who had been so blase that she and her staff thought that could wait until after the summer.

And the same elites and reporters were reporting for months that in a re-match now...
Sink would win.
But we don't have do-overs  a few months after the election, we just have the election.
Scott, a very flawed candidate, beat Sink, a very apathetic and blase candidate who didn't do the minimum required.

I ignore those stories for some of the same reasons that I voted against Sink, knowing that no matter how close the election might be or how much the news media, esp. the liberal news media in South Florida, wanted to play tail gunner for Sink and get Scott in a game of "gotcha," Sink was a seriously flawed person and candidate who was incapable of moving the football in Tallahassee and get the state out of its backwardness in so many areas.

Knowing that both branches of the state legislature are held by the GOP, and veto-proof if sink won, what could Sink possibly accomplish as governor given how  self-evident her personality and management flaws were?
She'd continually have been made a fool of as the legislature over-rode any vetoes she might made, even when I might have agreed with her reasoning.

To say the least, Alex Sink was not much of a gubernatorial candidate, and it's my guess that she would have been a terrible governor for the fourth-largest state in the country, even when she was right on the issue, because her personality and manner would NOT have worn well with residents.
In that election for governor between too very flawed candidates, we drew the well-meaning "Joker" who at least knew who he was, and we all have to live with that verdict for another three years.

Now, eleven months until the 2012 election, the same state "insiders" and experts I've described are alternately pre-ordaining Bill Nelson's re-election and/or the rise of some queer boomlet called the Connie Mack revolution.


To my way of thinking, where ideas -thoughtful and nuanced- really are important, Connie Mack is political 'fools gold' compared to Marco Rubio, who is Fort Knox in comparison, since as someone who supported Rubio from the beginning -even when state reporters were writing his premature obituary- I always knew that he was everything that Sink, Meek, Crist, Nelson and Mack are NOT.

In that comparison, to me, candidate Connie Mack is the small change you find in the shallow end of the hotel swimming pool while on summer vacation in North Carolina to escape the heat, humidity and boring existence of summertime South Florida.
(Asheville, North Carolina  1972 to be exact. A trip I've never forgotten: Mount Mitchell, Smokey Mountains, Stone Mountain, GA...)

Great for kids, like your two younger sisters, who race each other diving into the pool to get the quarters you throw, which amuses some of the other hotel guests around the pool otherwise zoning-out, but not really much to brag about for adults, or even teenagers paying close attention.

In short, there is no "there" there with Connie Mack IV.
Or any possibility of any upside that he would ever become the sort of thoughtful, savvy and sometimes counter-intuitive person that surprises you frequently with his principled stands representing the crazy-quilt of six different states cobbled into one that that is today's Florida, and able to cast important or even dire votes that will matter to this nation's future.


To me he's the personable but somewhat dis-connected high school homecoming king whose father is the mayor and largest developer in the area, and he's still milking the gravy train, occasionally doing the right thing, but not often enough to inspire either trust or respect.
To me, Connie Mack IV is NOT the answer to any reasonable question.


Like I've so often said on this blog about the city I live in, Hallandale Beach, and how it so thoroughly mis-managed to the detriment of the residents who want it to be MUCH BETTER now than it is, Mack's "An interpretive house of cards that falls apart at the slightest touch of rationality and evidence."


As for perpetually tone-deaf Alex Sink, the more things change...

Jetsetting Letter Misses Mark With Suffering Floridians
By Martin Merzer
Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Broward Comm. Stacy Ritter plays her indignant card -again- in Sun-Sentinel's Broward Politics blog video of her sounding off on "paparazzi''


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h5d2utn39w&hd=1

Broward Politics YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/BrowardPolitics

Website: http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/broward/blog/

Below, some other politically-oriented or current events-themed YouTube Channels you may want to peruse or subscribe to, like yours truly.

I'm still subscribed to The Hotline TV and Sayfie Review, but neither has posted anything new in one month and four months respectively.
http://www.youtube.com/user/HotlineTV
http://www.youtube.com/user/sayfiereview



MyActsofSedition YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/actsofsedition

Website: http://www.myactsofsedition.com/

Change Hallandale Beach
YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Butler1Mike

Website: http://www.changehallandale.com/

BrowardPalmBeach NewTimes YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/BrowardPalmBeach Website: http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/

Newt Gingrich YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ngingrich

Red Eye Recap YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/RedEyeRecap
Website: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/red-eye/index.html
Red Eye airs weeknights at 3am ET, 12am PT, on Fox News Channel.

I'm always saying here that "seeing is believing" -yes, you can quote me on that- but since so many South Florida print/TV reporters I've talked to in the past have expressed interest in shedding a well-needed light on some of these problems, often after hour-long, in-person conversations at their studios, news rooms or over at Panera's, only to actually do nothing
about making that story idea a reality, more direct action is necessary.
Well, I'm eliminating the middle-man -the South Florida news media.


After Thanksgiving, as part of some changes and additions I'm making to the blog and to the Hallandale Beach Blog YouTube Channel, which I have greatly under-utilized thus far, I will finally get those videos I've been promising here since... well, quite a while ago.

I plan on finally posting key highlights (
or low-lights) of not only Hallandale Beach and Hollywood City Commission/CRA meetings, Broward County Commission meetings, and the myriad South Florida civic meetings I hit, but also video of some longstanding Quality-of-Life problems throughout SE Broward and NE Miami-Dade that have proven troublesome or irritating to local citizen taxpayers, and which in many cases, have largely been ignored by the appropriate authorities, or incompetently managed.
No more.

While that will principally be in Hallandale Beach, Hollywood, Aventura and the odd world north of North Miami Beach, Home of the Chargers, I will also be posting video of what I observe and find troubling in Miami, Miami Beach, Fort Lauderdale and other parts of South Florida as well.


Please check back there again soon:
http://www.youtube.com/user/HallandaleBeachBlog

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Newt Gingrich on July 2nd On the Record with Greta van Sustern: Obama puts politics ahead of securing the borders

Newt Gingrich on 7/2/10 episode of On the Record with Greta Van Sustern (FOX News Channel): Obama puts politics ahead of securing the borders.


Transcript at http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/transcript/gingrich-obama039s-immigration-speech-was-039entirely-political039

See more on immigration at http://www.newt.org/issues/immigration

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AWYVVJSL0o



Monday, July 28, 2008

PARTY with a Purpose or Excuse to PARTY? Who can say?

See my comments after the article, featuring Hallandale Beach's Alex Lewy.
__________________________________________________
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/story/620000.html

Miami Herald
Party vote: Bar scene used to get younger voters involved
By Daniel Chang
July 28, 2008

The Hollywood nightclub is dark and the music so loud that conversation means leaning into an ear and shouting.

But the drinks are free until midnight, and anyway most in the upstairs room of Passion nightclub are dancing, not talking.

Still, Chris Chiari, a Democratic candidate for the Florida House of Representatives, mingles in the crowd, drink in hand, campaigning.

He shouts, by way of conversation: "This is real political action.''

This, to be exact, is Party Politics Inc. -- the latest, but not the first or only effort to engage 20-somethings in politics by appealing to their inner party animal.

The idea is simple: host parties with a two-hour open bar about once a month at South Florida nightclubs. Post fliers at local colleges and send messages to friends on Facebook and MySpace.

The target audience: Generation Y, or Echo Boomers, or Millenials. Really, anyone born between 1980 and 1994.

Sometimes, partygoers are asked to register to vote, or to fill out an absentee ballot request form. But mostly they're left alone to mingle with each other or with elected officials and candidates working the room for votes and campaign volunteers.

''We don't have long, boring speeches,'' says Alexander Lewy, 27, of Hallandale Beach, who co-founded Party Politics in fall 2007 with Matthew Baratz and Anthony Joyce, two 22-year-olds from Pembroke Pines.

Though Party Politics is registered as a Florida corporation and not a political entity -- and despite the protestations of its founders that they're a nonpartisan group -- the Democratic leanings are obvious and deep:

Baratz, Joyce and Lewy are officers of the Broward Young Democrats, which helps sponsor some of their events.

Joyce, who made a failed but well-publicized run for Pembroke Pines mayor in 2004, is an assistant to State Rep. Ari Porth (D-Coral Springs). Lewy, a congressional aide to U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-Miami), just launched his first run for public office, on the Hallandale Beach City Council.

Even the visual cues are Democratic: the Party Politics logo is a donkey -- ''It's actually a piñata . . . seriously,'' Lewy says -- and a flier for the recent nightclub party featured an image of the presumed Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, and a riff on his campaign slogan: "Yes We Can Party.''

Yet the group will organize events for candidates of any affiliation, Lewy insists. ''We don't force politics on anybody,'' he says.

REACHING OUT

Political affiliations aside, Party Politics's six events since November have drawn about 1,000 people, Lewy says. Baratz estimates those same events have led 150 people to register to vote or to fill out an absentee ballot request, says Baratz, an accountant and the only Party Politics founder not employed by an elected official. He also credits Party Politics for an estimated 20 percent increase in attendance at Broward Young Democrats' monthly meetings, which draw about 70 people.

Those are modest numbers, to be sure. And that's OK by Lewy. The idea isn't to just get voters psyched about the presidential election, he says, it's to motivate young Americans to engage in politics over the long term.

''It's not for the next four months,'' he says.

No matter whether Party Politics lives up to that test, the group is following a tried-and-true method for reaching young voters: personal, repeated contact, preferably in a friendly environment.

They're also doing it at a time when young voters are turning out to vote in larger numbers than in past elections.

Among voters 29 and younger, the Florida primaries in January drew 285,000, or 13 percent of the eligible population, according to the Pew Charitable Trusts. The state's 2000 primaries drew 80,000 young voters, or 4 percent.

To be sure, a lot has happened since 2000 that would motivate voters of all ages to become more engaged in politics. But young voters are particularly aware of the times in which they've come of age.

''Eighteen- to 29-year-olds right now have grown up and were introduced to public life in a time when we had contested elections, ideological polarization, and terrorist attacks and wars,'' says Abby Kiesa, an outreach coordinator and researcher at the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at Tufts University.

Add the spread of the 24-hour news cycle across TVs, computers and cellphones, and there's even more reason for young people to become politically engaged, Kiesa says.

Another development affecting young voters is that political campaigns are targeting them once again.

Elizabeth Matto, a political scientist who heads the Youth Political Participation Program for the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University, says that for a time political campaigns assumed young voters just weren't interested.

''There was such a long period of decline in youth voter turnout that it became a self-fulfilling prophecy,'' Matto said. "So the less youth turned out, the less candidates would reach out to them.''

That attitude began to change after the 2000 election, Matto says, when only 42 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds in America voted, compared to the high point of 55 percent in the 1972 presidential race.

Young voter apathy in 2000 also led to the emergence of groups such as Generation Engage, which brings political leaders to meet young voters in cafés, pool halls, and through video conferences; and Headcount, an effort to register young voters at rock concerts.

Perhaps the best known organization connecting youth interests and political activism is Rock the Vote, which was formed in 1990.

WILL IT LAST?

Even as these and other organizations work to engage young voters, though, no one assumes that 20-somethings will vote consistently in future elections or step up their political activism.

At the recent Party Politics event at Passion nightclub, Ruben Calixte, 25, of Lauderdale Lakes, said he was there more for the social networking than the politics.

It was Calixte's first time at a Party Politics event, but he said he intended to attend a meeting of the Broward Young Democrats and look into possibly joining.

He liked the idea of a political gathering in a nightclub and said the atmosphere did not dumb down the idea of activism.

''This is what people my age are doing,'' he said. "We like to go out to clubs. In order to get our attention, you have to go to where we are.''

A few days after the event, Baratz, one of the co-founders, reflected on the future political participation of the partygoers.

''Of course, yeah, on the one hand they're going for free booze,'' he says. "But on the other hand they're meeting new people and they know that, I would say, politics is in the air and it's just giving them an opportunity.''

Indeed, Chiari, the Democratic candidate for the Florida House of Representatives, sensed a recruitment opportunity in the crowd of more than 150.

''Even if 10 to 15 people become core activists, one person can knock on 100 doors a day,'' Chiari shouted above the noise. "There are people here tonight who will end up walking my precinct for me.''

Until then, they were just drinking and dancing. And maybe next time, they'll come back for more.

Reader comments at: http://pod01.prospero.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?msg=51894&nav=messages&webtag=kr-miamitm
____________________________________
You really have to see the somewhat bizarre photo accompanying the article on the Herald's URL, before the Herald moves it to archives in another six days, where the photos are never to be seen again. It looks like it could've been for a Girls Gone Wild Internet banner ad.
Someone pulling down their shirt to show off their cleavage.
Except it's a dude!

That cracked me up, though I don't know whether or not that was the intent.

For what a possible precursor of that group would've been like, in Washington, see http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=12957&utm_source=inform&utm_medium=lobox&utm_campaign=InformBox

What follows are a few comments on my own involvement in the early Nineties with some DC-area groups not totally dis-similar to the one described above.

Okay, they were completely different.

After a couple of rather uneventful years as a member of the Texas State Society, owing to my having been born in San Antonio and my family having lived continuously in Texas since 1855, due largely to the 'much-older and married' vibe of the organization at the time, I looked around for greener social pastures, unsure of what I was looking for exactly.

The third group I got involved with was Democrats of a New Generation, in 1993, which was the Under-35 vanguard of the National Democratic Club, http://www.natdemclub.org/ , back when they had a very nice three-story building of their own on Ivy Street, S.E., just east of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) HQ, http://www.democrats.org/ at 430 S. Capitol St. S.E.

Back before the Gingrich Revolution came to fruition in November of 1994, which saw many of my friends lose their Capitol Hill jobs and move away for new jobs, careers or grad school -and which
led to literally dozens of gorgeous young college grads passing thru the doors of the Heritage Foundation on Capitol Hill, a rare bi-partisan success story!- the NDC was a very popular site for political fundraisers, as well as a gathering spot for Young Dems of liberal, conservative or, like me,
moderate stripes.
Oh, Democratic unity, thy elusive elixir of success!
Did I mention there was a bar???

Trivia wise, it's also where I was first offered the opportunity to be the congressional campaign manager for a popular northeast Dem mayor running in an open seat.

(As it happens, I've always liked Newt Gingrich personally, http://newt.org/ and have always found that his natural curiosity, love for history and zest for ideas a nice contrast with many well-known Dems I'd always admired from afar. http://www.americansolutions.com/default.aspx
That changed once I got to Washington and actually saw them for what they really were -all too human and too often, sadly, too hypocritical for words. In many cases, they were caricatures of themself, folks who, sadly, often seemed to only consult history books written between 1933 and 1963.

This open-minded attitude towards Newt has almost always put me at odds with almost everyone I knew within the party, save a few fellow DLC Dems like me, who could see why his early proposals had so much natural appeal, even as libs whined and fumed about Newt's personality or
tactics, caught up in their eternal blood feuds that always put personality over results for citizens.

Perhaps that's why over the past few years, I've looked for practical public policy solutions more from people with some connection to The New America Foundation than the Brookings Institution. Though I should hasten to add that I'm always keeping my eyes peeled for something from Brookings that isn't 'typical' Brookings work product, in the zillions of emails I get from them a month. See http://www.newamerica.net/ and http://www.brookings.edu/)

These activities were before the creation of a practical vehicle like the DC Society of Young Professionals website, http://www.dcyoungpro.com/index.cfm , which can tap into an always interested young adult market in DC thru the use of new technology and reach folks interested in volunteering and philanthropy that my groups could never have hoped to reach during the Bush 41

years and early days of Clinton.

Shortly before I joined DNG, I'd been on the Board of Directors for the American Cancer Society's Washington D.C. Young Professionals organization, CIAO., which lasted a few years before everyone moved on as a result of career, age and family considerations.

Frankly, organizing events for our ACS group often proved frustrating, because compared to many similar-situated Young Professionals groups in the national capital area, esp. those of either an artistic or cultural bent, who already had a facility where they could host events, while we were trying to generate positive public awareness, new members and funds for the ACS, we also had to stay under very strict fundraising limits, which severely limited how much money we could spend on rent, food, invitations and incidentals for an event.
Back before everyone was emailing, texting, twittering and blogging like crazy, and printed invitations had to be done a certain way.

Not that we weren't already scrimping like crazy to begin with, because of our sense of purpose and dedication to making it successful, but our good intentions often ran head-first into local DC area caterers' confiscatory price structure, and their exclusive contracts at certain venues, which made them cost prohibitive even if we were given some slack on production costs, which we never were.

Because of my friendship and connections with some great folks over at the German Embassy on swanky Reservoir Road, one of my big pet projects was forever trying to organize a Breakfast with Wimbledon affair at the Embassy the morning of the Mens Finals, back when Boris Becker was always in the mix to win it. http://www.germany.info/relaunch/info/missions/embassy/embassy.html 4645 Reservoir Road NW

The NDC was the place where in the summer of 1988, along with hundreds of other politically active Dems, I watched the Lloyd Bentsen-Dan Quayle Vice Presidential debate.

(Months earlier, in March of 1988, I'd predicted that Dukakis would pick Bentsen as his VP choice to some Bentsen LAs living in a very nice group house on Capitol Hill that I was very keen on moving into.
Naturally, none of them shared my level of confidence that he'd be chosen, despite the after-the-fact logic, but I had the last laugh, because I not only was proven right by his eventual selection, but also
found a great place ten times better over in Tenleytown, near American University, living next to the Japanese Ambassador's residence on Nebraska Avenue, N.W.
For obvious reasons, I was suddenly living along one of THE safest streets in all of the Greater Washington area.
In stark contrast to Capitol Hill and that townhouse I'd considered earlier, with its rampant street crime back then.

Many of my newly-made friends were victims of crime in that summer of '88, including a friend who'd gone to Austin and who had started a job over in Foggy Bottom at the State Dept.
He got robbed at gunpoint and beaten, not far from the front of Sen. and Mrs. Moynihan's then-home, which was across the street and down a few houses from me on E. Capitol Street, N.E., five blocks east of the U.S. Capitol.
The cops wanted him to come by the station because they were "too busy" to send an Officer.)

Because of my speed and my arm, just as had been the case in Little League and Pony League growing-up in North Miami Beach, I played centerfield for the DNG coed softball team in the Congressional softball league, which played twice a week for most of the summer.
We played all of our ballgames on the grassy areas of The Mall, mostly between the Air and Space Museum and the Washington Monument down on 15th Street, N.W., though more often than not we were near the well-known carousel near the Smithsonian Castle.

That often meant having to get used to the idea of un-suspecting tourists or locals walking or jogging in front of me or just behind me as I waited for the next pitch, esp. if I was playing deep, on the gravel pathways that connected the Capitol area with the Monument to the west.
Then it was sort of like playing traffic cop, and having to be concerned that somebody wasn't beaned by a fly ball as they strolled by.
My recollection is that the DNG team only played once, more-or-less directly near the Washington Monument, but it was something to remember for me, since centerfield actually sloped downward towards 15th Street and the tourists and Tour Mobiles.

Of all the many funny or ironic team nicknames I ever heard of while in D.C., the best was the Bank Robbers, the name of the Senate Banking Committee's softball team, back when their chairman was Sen. Donald Riegele of Michigan.
Due to my job responsibilities at the time, I rather quickly got to know many of the hard-working professional staffers there, not only from my frequent attendance at their myriad hearings, but over frequent chats in the hallways and down in the cafeteria over cold Cokes on sweltering mind-numbing days, conversations which were almost always about everything but work.
Yes, there were an awful lot of very smart and good-looking women working there, he said almost
wistfully.

Maybe not the kind of absurd Miami model 'good-looking' standard we're used to running into down here, from time to time, but the sort of bright, confident and attractive Midwestern girl-next-door good looks that never gets old for me, and for which I've always been a sucker for.